Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscriptions
Total
2090 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-0708 | 3 Huawei, Microsoft, Siemens | 131 Agile Controller-campus, Agile Controller-campus Firmware, Bh620 V2 and 128 more | 2025-07-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests, aka 'Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0143 | 3 Microsoft, Philips, Siemens | 28 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 25 more | 2025-07-28 | 8.8 High |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40438 | 11 Apache, Broadcom, Debian and 8 more | 45 Http Server, Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux and 42 more | 2025-07-28 | 9 Critical |
| A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44228 | 13 Apache, Apple, Bentley and 10 more | 178 Log4j, Xcode, Synchro and 175 more | 2025-07-28 | 10 Critical |
| Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5689 | 3 Hpe, Intel, Siemens | 71 Proliant Ml10 Gen9 Server, Proliant Ml10 Gen9 Server Firmware, Active Management Technology Firmware and 68 more | 2025-07-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) and Intel Standard Manageability (ISM). An unprivileged local attacker could provision manageability features gaining unprivileged network or local system privileges on Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT), Intel Standard Manageability (ISM), and Intel Small Business Technology (SBT). | ||||
| CVE-2017-0144 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2025-07-28 | 8.8 High |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0145 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2025-07-28 | 8.8 High |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8562 | 1 Siemens | 4 Simatic Cp 1543-1, Simatic Cp 1543-1 Firmware, Siplus Net Cp 1543-1 and 1 more | 2025-07-28 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28), SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28). Under special conditions it was possible to write SNMP variables on port 161/udp which should be read-only and should only be configured with TIA-Portal. A write to these variables could reduce the availability or cause a denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0146 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2025-07-28 | 8.8 High |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0148. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22965 | 6 Cisco, Oracle, Redhat and 3 more | 45 Cx Cloud Agent, Commerce Platform, Communications Cloud Native Core Automated Test Suite and 42 more | 2025-07-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0148 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 27 Server Message Block, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511 and 24 more | 2025-07-28 | 8.1 High |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0146. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0847 | 7 Fedoraproject, Linux, Netapp and 4 more | 42 Fedora, Linux Kernel, H300e and 39 more | 2025-07-28 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe and push_pipe functions in the Linux kernel and could thus contain stale values. An unprivileged local user could use this flaw to write to pages in the page cache backed by read only files and as such escalate their privileges on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0160 | 13 Broadcom, Canonical, Debian and 10 more | 37 Symantec Messaging Gateway, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 34 more | 2025-07-28 | 7.5 High |
| The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0147 | 2 Microsoft, Siemens | 26 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1511, Windows 10 1607 and 23 more | 2025-07-28 | 7.5 High |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2021-4034 | 7 Canonical, Oracle, Polkit Project and 4 more | 37 Ubuntu Linux, Http Server, Zfs Storage Appliance Kit and 34 more | 2025-07-28 | 7.8 High |
| A local privilege escalation vulnerability was found on polkit's pkexec utility. The pkexec application is a setuid tool designed to allow unprivileged users to run commands as privileged users according predefined policies. The current version of pkexec doesn't handle the calling parameters count correctly and ends trying to execute environment variables as commands. An attacker can leverage this by crafting environment variables in such a way it'll induce pkexec to execute arbitrary code. When successfully executed the attack can cause a local privilege escalation given unprivileged users administrative rights on the target machine. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45046 | 8 Apache, Cvat, Debian and 5 more | 71 Log4j, Computer Vision Annotation Tool, Debian Linux and 68 more | 2025-07-28 | 9 Critical |
| It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26276 | 1 Siemens | 3 Jt2go, Parasolid, Teamcenter Visualization | 2025-07-26 | 3.3 Low |
| A vulnerability has been identified in JT2Go (All versions < V2312.0004), Parasolid V35.1 (All versions < V35.1.254), Parasolid V36.0 (All versions < V36.0.207), Parasolid V36.1 (All versions < V36.1.147), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.12), Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.9), Teamcenter Visualization V2312 (All versions < V2312.0004). The affected application contains a stack exhaustion vulnerability while parsing a specially crafted X_T file. This could allow an attacker to cause denial of service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26275 | 1 Siemens | 3 Jt2go, Parasolid, Teamcenter Visualization | 2025-07-24 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in JT2Go (All versions < V2312.0004), Parasolid V35.1 (All versions < V35.1.254), Parasolid V36.0 (All versions < V36.0.207), Parasolid V36.1 (All versions < V36.1.147), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.12), Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.9), Teamcenter Visualization V2312 (All versions < V2312.0004). The affected applications contain an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted X_T files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35303 | 1 Siemens | 1 Tecnomatix Plant Simulation | 2025-07-21 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2302 (All versions < V2302.0012), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2404 (All versions < V2404.0001). The affected applications contain a type confusion vulnerability while parsing specially crafted MODEL files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-22958) | ||||
| CVE-2024-30206 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simatic Rtls Locating Manager | 2025-07-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA00) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1). Affected SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager Clients do not properly check the integrity of update files. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to alter update files in transit and trick an authorized user into installing malicious code. A successful exploit requires the attacker to be able to modify the communication between server and client on the network. | ||||