Total
334997 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-64124 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows OS Command Injection.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): before 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64123 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Unintended Proxy or Intermediary vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows Network Boundary Bridging.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): through and including release 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64122 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| Insufficiently Protected Credentials vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows Signature Spoofing by Key Theft.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): through 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64121 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): from 2.3.8 before 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64120 | 2 Nuvation Energy, Nuvationenergy | 6 Multi-stack Controller, Nplatform, Nuvmsc3-04s-c and 3 more | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Nuvation Energy Multi-Stack Controller (MSC) allows OS Command Injection.This issue affects Multi-Stack Controller (MSC): from 2.3.8 before 2.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15284 | 1 Qs Project | 1 Qs | 2026-02-26 | 3.7 Low |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. Summary The arrayLimit option in qs did not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), only for indexed notation (a[0]=1). This is a consistency bug; arrayLimit should apply uniformly across all array notations. Note: The default parameterLimit of 1000 effectively mitigates the DoS scenario originally described. With default options, bracket notation cannot produce arrays larger than parameterLimit regardless of arrayLimit, because each a[]=valueconsumes one parameter slot. The severity has been reduced accordingly. Details The arrayLimit option only checked limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but did not enforce it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working code (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays. PoC const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Note on parameterLimit interaction: The original advisory's "DoS demonstration" claimed a length of 10,000, but parameterLimit (default: 1000) caps parsing to 1,000 parameters. With default options, the actual output is 1,000, not 10,000. Impact Consistency bug in arrayLimit enforcement. With default parameterLimit, the practical DoS risk is negligible since parameterLimit already caps the total number of parsed parameters (and thus array elements from bracket notation). The risk increases only when parameterLimit is explicitly set to a very high value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0805 | 2 Arcadia Technology, Craftycontrol | 2 Crafty Controller, Crafty Controller | 2026-02-26 | 8.2 High |
| An input neutralization vulnerability in the Backup Configuration component of Crafty Controller allows a remote, authenticated attacker to perform file tampering and remote code execution via path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0963 | 2 Arcadia Technology, Craftycontrol | 2 Crafty Controller, Crafty Controller | 2026-02-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| An input neutralization vulnerability in the File Operations API Endpoint component of Crafty Controller allows a remote, authenticated attacker to perform file tampering and remote code execution via path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26045 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-02-26 | 7.2 High |
| A flaw was identified in Moodle’s backup restore functionality where specially crafted backup files were not properly validated during processing. If a malicious backup file is restored, it could lead to unintended execution of server-side code. Since restore capabilities are typically available to privileged users, exploitation requires authenticated access. Successful exploitation could result in full compromise of the Moodle server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26046 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-02-26 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability was found in a Moodle TeX filter administrative setting where insufficient sanitization of configuration input could allow command injection. On sites where the TeX filter is enabled and ImageMagick is installed, a maliciously crafted setting value entered by an administrator could result in unintended system command execution. While exploitation requires administrative privileges, successful compromise could affect the entire Moodle server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26047 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-02-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| A denial-of-service vulnerability was identified in Moodle’s TeX formula editor. When rendering TeX content using mimetex, insufficient execution time limits could allow specially crafted formulas to consume excessive server resources. An authenticated user could abuse this behavior to degrade performance or cause service interruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63409 | 2 Gcom, Gcomtw | 3 Epon 1ge C00r371v00b01, Gcom Epon 1ge, Gcom Epon 1ge Firmware | 2026-02-26 | 8.8 High |
| Privilege escalation and improper access control in GCOM EPON 1GE C00R371V00B01 allows remote authenticated users to modify administrator only settings and extract administrator credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69985 | 1 Frangoteam | 1 Fuxa | 2026-02-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| FUXA 1.2.8 and prior contains an Authentication Bypass vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE). The vulnerability exists in the server/api/jwt-helper.js middleware, which improperly trusts the HTTP "Referer" header to validate internal requests. A remote unauthenticated attacker can bypass JWT authentication by spoofing the Referer header to match the server's host. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to access the protected /api/runscript endpoint and execute arbitrary Node.js code on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13776 | 2 Finka, Tik-soft | 12 Finka-faktura, Finka-fk, Finka-kpr and 9 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.1 High |
| Multiple Finka programs use hard-coded Firebird database credentials (shared across all instances of this software). A malicious attacker in local network who knows default credentials is able to read and edit database content. This vulnerability has been fixed in version: Finka-FK 18.5, Finka-KPR 16.6, Finka-Płace 13.4, Finka-Faktura 18.3, Finka-Magazyn 8.3, Finka-STW 12.3 | ||||
| CVE-2026-26938 | 2026-02-26 | 8.6 High | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine (CWE-1336) exists in Workflows in Kibana which could allow an attacker to read arbitrary files from the Kibana server filesystem, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Code Injection (CAPEC-242). This requires an authenticated user who has the workflowsManagement:executeWorkflow privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26937 | 2026-02-26 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in the Timelion component in Kibana can lead Denial of Service via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153) | ||||
| CVE-2026-26227 | 2026-02-26 | N/A | ||
| VideoLAN VLC for Android prior to version 3.7.0 contains an authentication bypass in the Remote Access Server feature due to missing or insufficient rate limiting on one-time password (OTP) verification. The Remote Access Server uses a 4-digit OTP and does not enforce effective throttling or lockout within the OTP validity window, allowing an attacker with network reachability to the server to repeatedly attempt OTP verification until a valid user_session cookie is issued. Successful exploitation results in unauthorized access to the Remote Access interface, limited to media files explicitly shared by the VLC for Android user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25370 | 2 Aresit, Wordpress | 2 Wp Compress, Wordpress | 2026-02-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in AresIT WP Compress wp-compress-image-optimizer allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP Compress: from n/a through <= 6.60.28. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23750 | 2026-02-26 | 8.1 High | ||
| Golioth Pouch version 0.1.0, prior to commit 1b2219a1, contains a heap-based buffer overflow in BLE GATT server certificate handling. server_cert_write() allocates a heap buffer of size CONFIG_POUCH_SERVER_CERT_MAX_LEN when receiving the first fragment, then appends subsequent fragments using memcpy() without verifying that sufficient capacity remains. An adjacent BLE client can send unauthenticated fragments whose combined size exceeds the allocated buffer, causing a heap overflow and crash; integrity impact is also possible due to memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23749 | 2026-02-26 | 2.9 Low | ||
| Golioth Firmware SDK version 0.19.1 prior to 0.22.0, fixed in commit 0e788217, contain an out-of-bounds read due to improper null termination of a blockwise transfer path. blockwise_transfer_init() accepts a path whose length equals CONFIG_GOLIOTH_COAP_MAX_PATH_LEN and copies it using strncpy() without guaranteeing a trailing NUL byte, leaving ctx->path unterminated. A later strlen() on this buffer (in golioth_coap_client_get_internal()) can read past the end of the allocation, resulting in a crash/denial of service. The input is application-controlled (not network by default). | ||||