Total
297973 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-3234 | 2025-06-14 | 7.2 High | ||
| The File Manager Pro – Filester plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.8. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Administrators have the ability to extend file manager usage privileges to lower-level users including subscribers, which would make this vulnerability more severe on such sites. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30084 | 2025-06-14 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| A stored XSS vulnerability in RSMail! component 1.19.20 - 1.22.26 for Joomla was discovered. The issue occurs within the dashboard component, where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being stored and rendered. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code into text fields or other input points, which is subsequently executed in the browser of any user who clicks on the crafted text in the dashboard. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27689 | 2025-06-14 | 7.8 High | ||
| Dell iDRAC Tools, version(s) prior to 11.3.0.0, contain(s) an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3473 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-14 | 6.7 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.1 could allow a local privileged user to escalate their privileges to root due to insecure inherited permissions created by the program. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32711 | 2025-06-14 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Ai command injection in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5687 | 2025-06-14 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability in Mozilla VPN on macOS allows privilege escalation from a normal user to root. *This bug only affects Mozilla VPN on macOS. Other operating systems are unaffected.* This vulnerability affects Mozilla VPN 2.28.0 < (macOS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-4228 | 2025-06-14 | N/A | ||
| An incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Cortex® XDR Broker VM allows an authenticated administrative user to execute certain files available within the Broker VM and escalate their privileges to root. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4232 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Globalprotect App | 2025-06-14 | N/A |
| An improper neutralization of wildcards vulnerability in the log collection feature of Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app on macOS allows a non administrative user to escalate their privileges to root. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4613 | 2025-06-14 | N/A | ||
| Path traversal in Google Web Designer's template handling versions prior to 16.3.0.0407 on Windows allows attacker to achieve remote code execution by tricking users into downloading a malicious ad template | ||||
| CVE-2025-26521 | 2025-06-14 | 8.1 High | ||
| When an Apache CloudStack user-account creates a CKS-based Kubernetes cluster in a project, the API key and the secret key of the 'kubeadmin' user of the caller account are used to create the secret config in the CKS-based Kubernetes cluster. A member of the project who can access the CKS-based Kubernetes cluster, can also access the API key and secret key of the 'kubeadmin' user of the CKS cluster's creator's account. An attacker who's a member of the project can exploit this to impersonate and perform privileged actions that can result in complete compromise of the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of resources owned by the creator's account. CKS users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.19.3.0 or 4.20.1.0, which fixes this issue.Updating Existing Kubernetes Clusters in ProjectsA service account should be created for each project to provide limited access specifically for Kubernetes cluster providers and autoscaling. Follow the steps below to create a new service account, update the secret inside the cluster, and regenerate existing API and service keys:1. Create a New Service AccountCreate a new account using the role "Project Kubernetes Service Role" with the following details: Account Name kubeadmin-<FIRST_EIGHT_CHARACTERS_OF_PROJECT_ID> First Name Kubernetes Last Name Service User Account Type 0 (Normal User) Role ID <ID_OF_SERVICE_ROLE> 2. Add the Service Account to the ProjectAdd this account to the project where the Kubernetes cluster(s) are hosted. 3. Generate API and Secret KeysGenerate API Key and Secret Key for the default user of this account. 4. Update the CloudStack Secret in the Kubernetes ClusterCreate a temporary file `/tmp/cloud-config` with the following data: api-url = <API_URL> # For example: <MS_URL>/client/api api-key = <SERVICE_USER_API_KEY> secret-key = <SERVICE_USER_SECRET_KEY> project-id = <PROJECT_ID> Delete the existing secret using kubectl and Kubernetes cluster config: ./kubectl --kubeconfig kube.conf -n kube-system delete secret cloudstack-secret Create a new secret using kubectl and Kubernetes cluster config: ./kubectl --kubeconfig kube.conf -n kube-system create secret generic cloudstack-secret --from-file=/tmp/cloud-config Remove the temporary file: rm /tmp/cloud-config5. Regenerate API and Secret KeysRegenerate the API and secret keys for the original user account that was used to create the Kubernetes cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47849 | 2025-06-14 | 8.8 High | ||
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Apache CloudStack versions 4.10.0.0 through 4.20.0.0 where a malicious Domain Admin user in the ROOT domain can get the API key and secret key of user-accounts of Admin role type in the same domain. This operation is not appropriately restricted and allows the attacker to assume control over higher-privileged user-accounts. A malicious Domain Admin attacker can impersonate an Admin user-account and gain access to sensitive APIs and resources that could result in the compromise of resource integrity and confidentiality, data loss, denial of service, and availability of infrastructure managed by CloudStack. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.19.3.0 or 4.20.1.0, which fixes the issue with the following: * Strict validation on Role Type hierarchy: the caller's role must be equal to or higher than the target user's role. * API privilege comparison: the caller must possess all privileges of the user they are operating on. * Two new domain-level settings (restricted to the default admin): - role.types.allowed.for.operations.on.accounts.of.same.role.type: Defines which role types are allowed to act on users of the same role type. Default: "Admin, DomainAdmin, ResourceAdmin". - allow.operations.on.users.in.same.account: Allows/disallows user operations within the same account. Default: true. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47713 | 2025-06-14 | 8.8 High | ||
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Apache CloudStack versions 4.10.0.0 through 4.20.0.0 where a malicious Domain Admin user in the ROOT domain can reset the password of user-accounts of Admin role type. This operation is not appropriately restricted and allows the attacker to assume control over higher-privileged user-accounts. A malicious Domain Admin attacker can impersonate an Admin user-account and gain access to sensitive APIs and resources that could result in the compromise of resource integrity and confidentiality, data loss, denial of service, and availability of infrastructure managed by CloudStack. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache CloudStack 4.19.3.0 or 4.20.1.0, which fixes the issue with the following: * Strict validation on Role Type hierarchy: the caller's user-account role must be equal to or higher than the target user-account's role. * API privilege comparison: the caller must possess all privileges of the user they are operating on. * Two new domain-level settings (restricted to the default Admin): - role.types.allowed.for.operations.on.accounts.of.same.role.type: Defines which role types are allowed to act on users of the same role type. Default: "Admin, DomainAdmin, ResourceAdmin". - allow.operations.on.users.in.same.account: Allows/disallows user operations within the same account. Default: true. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3835 | 2025-06-14 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| Zohocorp ManageEngine Exchange Reporter Plus versions 5721 and prior are vulnerable to Remote code execution in the Content Search module. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36633 | 2025-06-14 | 8.8 High | ||
| In Tenable Agent versions prior to 10.8.5 on a Windows host, it was found that a non-administrative user could arbitrarily delete local system files with SYSTEM privilege, potentially leading to local privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22237 | 2025-06-14 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| An attacker with access to a minion key can exploit the 'on demand' pillar functionality with a specially crafted git url which could cause and arbitrary command to be run on the master with the same privileges as the master process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38824 | 2025-06-14 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| Directory traversal vulnerability in recv_file method allows arbitrary files to be written to the master cache directory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6059 | 2025-06-14 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Seraphinite Accelerator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.27.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'OnAdminApi_CacheOpBegin' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform several administrative actions, including deleting the cache, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50150 | 2025-06-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2025-50149 | 2025-06-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2025-50148 | 2025-06-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||