Filtered by vendor Cloudfoundry
Subscriptions
Total
108 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2016-0732 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal | 4 Cf-release, Uaa-release, User Account And Authentication and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
The identity zones feature in Pivotal Cloud Foundry 208 through 229; UAA 2.0.0 through 2.7.3 and 3.0.0; UAA-Release 2 through 4, when configured with multiple identity zones; and Elastic Runtime 1.6.0 through 1.6.13 allows remote authenticated users with privileges in one zone to gain privileges and perform operations on a different zone via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2016-0761 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Garden Linux, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
Cloud Foundry Garden-Linux versions prior to v0.333.0 and Elastic Runtime 1.6.x version prior to 1.6.17 contain a flaw in managing container files during Docker image preparation that could be used to delete, corrupt or overwrite host files and directories, including other container filesystems on the host. | ||||
CVE-2017-8031 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 2 Cf-release, Uaa-release | 2025-04-20 | 5.3 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release (all versions prior to v279) and UAA (30.x versions prior to 30.6, 45.x versions prior to 45.4, 52.x versions prior to 52.1). In some cases, the UAA allows an authenticated user for a particular client to revoke client tokens for other users on the same client. This occurs only if the client is using opaque tokens or JWT tokens validated using the check_token endpoint. A malicious actor could cause denial of service. | ||||
CVE-2016-0713 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 1 Cf-release | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Gorouter in Cloud Foundry cf-release v141 through v228 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via vectors related to modified requests. | ||||
CVE-2017-8047 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal | 2 Cf-release, Routing-release | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Cloud Foundry router routing-release all versions prior to v0.163.0 and cf-release all versions prior to v274, in some applications, it is possible to append a combination of characters to the URL that will allow for an open redirect. An attacker could exploit this as a phishing attack to gain access to user credentials or other sensitive data. NOTE: 274 resolves the vulnerability but has a serious bug that is fixed in 275. | ||||
CVE-2017-4970 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 2 Cf-release, Staticfile Buildpack | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release v255 and Staticfile buildpack versions v1.4.0 - v1.4.3. A regression introduced in the Static file build pack causes the Staticfile.auth configuration to be ignored when the Static file file is not present in the application root. Applications containing a Staticfile.auth file but not a Static file had their basic auth turned off when an operator upgraded the Static file build pack in the foundation to one of the vulnerable versions. Note that Static file applications without a Static file are technically misconfigured, and will not successfully detect unless the Static file build pack is explicitly specified. | ||||
CVE-2017-4972 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v257; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.14, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.8, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.10, and other versions prior to v3.15.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.12, 24.x versions prior to v24.7, and other versions prior to v30. An attacker can use a blind SQL injection attack to query the contents of the UAA database. | ||||
CVE-2017-4991 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 7.2 High |
An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v260; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.16, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.10, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.12, and other versions prior to v3.17.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.14, 24.x versions prior to v24.9, 30.x versions prior to 30.2, and other versions prior to v36. Privileged users in one zone are allowed to perform a password reset for users in a different zone. | ||||
CVE-2017-4969 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 1 Cf-release | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
The Cloud Controller in Cloud Foundry cf-release versions prior to v255 allows authenticated developer users to exceed memory and disk quotas for tasks. | ||||
CVE-2016-4468 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
SQL injection vulnerability in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 238; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.4, 3.x before 3.3.0.2, and 3.4.x before 3.4.1; UAA BOSH before 11.2 and 12.x before 12.2; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.29 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.8 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2016-8218 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 2 Cf-release, Routing-release | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation routing-release versions prior to 0.142.0 and cf-release versions 203 to 231. Incomplete validation logic in JSON Web Token (JWT) libraries can allow unprivileged attackers to impersonate other users to the routing API, aka an "Unauthenticated JWT signing algorithm in routing" issue. | ||||
CVE-2015-3189 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 3.7 Low |
With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v208 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.5 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier, old Password Reset Links are not expired after the user changes their current email address to a new one. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||
CVE-2015-3190 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the UAA logout link is susceptible to an open redirect which allows an attacker to insert malicious web page as a redirect parameter. | ||||
CVE-2015-3191 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||
CVE-2015-5170 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks on PWS and log a user into an arbitrary account by leveraging lack of CSRF checks. | ||||
CVE-2015-5171 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
The password change functionality in Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire existing sessions. | ||||
CVE-2015-5172 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire password reset links. | ||||
CVE-2015-5173 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving emails with password recovery links, aka "Cross Domain Referer Leakage." | ||||
CVE-2015-1834 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
A path traversal vulnerability was identified in the Cloud Foundry component Cloud Controller that affects cf-release versions prior to v208 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.4.2. Path traversal is the 'outbreak' of a given directory structure through relative file paths in the user input. It aims at accessing files and directories that are stored outside the web root folder, for disallowed reading or even executing arbitrary system commands. An attacker could use a certain parameter of the file path for instance to inject '../' sequences in order to navigate through the file system. In this particular case a remote authenticated attacker can exploit the identified vulnerability in order to upload arbitrary files to the server running a Cloud Controller instance - outside the isolated application container. | ||||
CVE-2016-0780 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
It was discovered that cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.5.x versions prior to 1.5.17 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18 do not properly enforce disk quotas in certain cases. An attacker could use an improper disk quota value to bypass enforcement and consume all the disk on DEAs/CELLs causing a potential denial of service for other applications. |