Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Scalance Xr528-6m
Subscriptions
Total
12 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-9232 | 2 Openssl, Siemens | 42 Openssl, Ruggedcom Rst2428p, Ruggedcom Rst2428p Firmware and 39 more | 2026-11-09 | 5.9 Medium |
| Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may trigger an out-of-bounds read if the 'no_proxy' environment variable is set and the host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address. Impact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application. The OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications but they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used by these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker. In this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash. Furthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be passed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have a 'no_proxy' environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases: 3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9230 | 3 Debian, Openssl, Siemens | 40 Debian Linux, Openssl, Ruggedcom Rst2428p and 37 more | 2026-11-09 | 9.8 Critical |
| Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write. Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code. Although the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability could be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to perform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS messages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as Moderate severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9231 | 2 Openssl, Siemens | 35 Openssl, Ruggedcom Rst2428p, Ruggedcom Rst2428p Firmware and 32 more | 2026-11-09 | 5.9 Medium |
| Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker.. While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack. OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 13 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 10 more | 172 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 169 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | ||||
| CVE-2024-50302 | 5 Debian, Google, Linux and 2 more | 42 Debian Linux, Android, Linux Kernel and 39 more | 2026-05-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let's zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can't be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36325 | 1 Siemens | 180 Scalance M-800, Scalance M-800 Firmware, Scalance S615 and 177 more | 2026-04-14 | 6.8 Medium |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize data introduced by an user when rendering the web interface. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code and lead to a DOM-based XSS. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36324 | 1 Siemens | 168 Scalance M-800, Scalance M-800 Firmware, Scalance S615 and 165 more | 2026-04-14 | 7.5 High |
| Affected devices do not properly handle the renegotiation of SSL/TLS parameters. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass the TCP brute force prevention and lead to a denial of service condition for the duration of the attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36323 | 1 Siemens | 180 Scalance M-800, Scalance M-800 Firmware, Scalance S615 and 177 more | 2026-04-14 | 9.1 Critical |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize an input field. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code or spawn a system root shell. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46140 | 1 Siemens | 202 Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu Firmware, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Nam and 199 more | 2025-04-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Affected devices use a weak encryption scheme to encrypt the debug zip file. This could allow an authenticated attacker to decrypt the contents of the file and retrieve debug information about the system. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46142 | 1 Siemens | 202 Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu Firmware, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Nam and 199 more | 2025-04-21 | 5.7 Medium |
| Affected devices store the CLI user passwords encrypted in flash memory. Attackers with physical access to the device could retrieve the file and decrypt the CLI user passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46143 | 1 Siemens | 202 Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Eu Firmware, Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4g\) Nam and 199 more | 2025-01-14 | 2.7 Low |
| Affected devices do not check the TFTP blocksize correctly. This could allow an authenticated attacker to read from an uninitialized buffer that potentially contains previously allocated data. | ||||
| CVE-2021-37182 | 1 Siemens | 34 Scalance Xm408-4c, Scalance Xm408-4c Firmware, Scalance Xm408-4c L3 and 31 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE XM408-4C (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM408-4C (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM408-8C (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM408-8C (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM416-4C (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM416-4C (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 1x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 1x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 24V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 24V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 2x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 2x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 1x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 1x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 24V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 24V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 2x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 2x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (2HR2) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (2HR2, L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2, L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5). The OSPF protocol implementation in affected devices fails to verify the checksum and length fields in the OSPF LS Update messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause interruptions in the network by sending specially crafted OSPF packets. Successful exploitation requires OSPF to be enabled on an affected device. | ||||
Page 1 of 1.