Total
4109 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-10903 | 1 Princeton | 2 Ptw-wms1, Ptw-wms1 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Improper authentication issue in PTW-WMS1 firmware version 2.000.012 allows remote attackers to log in to the device with root privileges and conduct arbitrary operations via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9361 | 1 Moxa | 51 Nport 5100 Series Firmware, Nport 5100a Series Firmware, Nport 5110 and 48 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Moxa NPort 5110 versions prior to 2.6, NPort 5130/5150 Series versions prior to 3.6, NPort 5200 Series versions prior to 2.8, NPort 5400 Series versions prior to 3.11, NPort 5600 Series versions prior to 3.7, NPort 5100A Series & NPort P5150A versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5200A Series versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5150AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5250AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5450AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5600-8-DT Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 5600-8-DTL Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 6x50 Series versions prior to 1.13.11, NPort IA5450A versions prior to v1.4. Administration passwords can be retried without authenticating. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7909 | 1 Advantech B\+b Smartworx | 2 Mesr901, Mesr901 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Use of Client-Side Authentication issue was discovered in Advantech B+B SmartWorx MESR901 firmware versions 1.5.2 and prior. The web interface uses JavaScript to check client authentication and redirect unauthorized users. Attackers may intercept requests and bypass authentication to access restricted web pages. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9939 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sipass Integrated | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was discovered in Siemens SiPass integrated (All versions before V2.70) that could allow an attacker with network access to the SiPass integrated server to bypass the authentication mechanism and perform administrative operations. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12225 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Lan Management Solution | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web functionality of the Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to hijack another user's administrative session, aka a Session Fixation Vulnerability. The vulnerability is due to the reuse of a preauthentication session token as part of the postauthentication session. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by obtaining the presession token ID. An exploit could allow an attacker to hijack an existing user's session. Known Affected Releases 4.2(5). Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf58392. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14003 | 1 Lavalink | 2 Ether-serial Link, Ether-serial Link Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An Authentication Bypass by Spoofing issue was discovered in LAVA Ether-Serial Link (ESL) running firmware versions 6.01.00/29.03.2007 and prior versions. An improper authentication vulnerability has been identified, which, if exploited, would allow an attacker with the same IP address to bypass authentication by accessing a specific uniform resource locator. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3854 | 1 Cisco | 12 2500 Wireless Lan Controller, 2504 Wireless Lan Controller, 5500 Wireless Lan Controller and 9 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability in the mesh code of Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to impersonate a WLC in a meshed topology. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication of the parent access point in a mesh configuration. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing the target system to disconnect from the correct parent access point and reconnect to a rogue access point owned by the attacker. An exploit could allow the attacker to control the traffic flowing through the impacted access point or take full control of the target system. This vulnerability affects the following products running a vulnerable version of Wireless LAN Controller software and configured for meshed mode: Cisco 8500 Series Wireless Controller, Cisco 5500 Series Wireless Controller, Cisco 2500 Series Wireless Controller, Cisco Flex 7500 Series Wireless Controller, Cisco Virtual Wireless Controller, Wireless Services Module 2 (WiSM2). Note that additional configuration is needed in addition to upgrading to a fixed release. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuc98992 CSCuu14804. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000020 | 3 Ecos, Greatek, Totolink | 3 Embedded Web Servers, Soho, Soho | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SYN Flood or FIN Flood attack in ECos 1 and other versions embedded devices results in web Authentication Bypass. "eCos Embedded Web Servers used by Multiple Routers and Home devices, while sending SYN Flood or FIN Flood packets fails to validate and handle the packets and does not ask for any sign of authentication resulting in Authentication Bypass. An attacker can take complete advantage of this bug and take over the device remotely or locally. The bug has been successfully tested and reproduced in some versions of SOHO Routers manufactured by TOTOLINK, GREATEK and others." | ||||
| CVE-2017-7919 | 1 Newport | 4 Xps-cx, Xps-cx Firmware, Xps-qx and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An Improper Authentication issue was discovered in Newport XPS-Cx and XPS-Qx. An attacker may bypass authentication by accessing a specific uniform resource locator (URL). | ||||
| CVE-2016-9369 | 1 Moxa | 51 Nport 5100 Series Firmware, Nport 5100a Series Firmware, Nport 5110 and 48 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Moxa NPort 5110 versions prior to 2.6, NPort 5130/5150 Series versions prior to 3.6, NPort 5200 Series versions prior to 2.8, NPort 5400 Series versions prior to 3.11, NPort 5600 Series versions prior to 3.7, NPort 5100A Series & NPort P5150A versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5200A Series versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5150AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5250AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5450AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5600-8-DT Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 5600-8-DTL Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 6x50 Series versions prior to 1.13.11, NPort IA5450A versions prior to v1.4. Firmware can be updated over the network without authentication, which may allow remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000089 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Builds in Jenkins are associated with an authentication that controls the permissions that the build has to interact with other elements in Jenkins. The Pipeline: Build Step Plugin did not check the build authentication it was running as and allowed triggering any other project in Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9624 | 1 Mantisbt | 1 Mantisbt | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CAPTCHA bypass vulnerability in MantisBT before 1.2.19. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14080 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Mobile Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Authentication bypass vulnerability in Trend Micro Mobile Security (Enterprise) versions before 9.7 Patch 3 allows attackers to access a specific part of the console using a blank password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000106 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Blue Ocean | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Blue Ocean allows the creation of GitHub organization folders that are set up to scan a GitHub organization for repositories and branches containing a Jenkinsfile, and create corresponding pipelines in Jenkins. Its SCM content REST API supports the pipeline creation and editing feature in Blue Ocean. The SCM content REST API did not check the current user's authentication or credentials. If the GitHub organization folder was created via Blue Ocean, it retained a reference to its creator's GitHub credentials. This allowed users with read access to the GitHub organization folder to create arbitrary commits in the repositories inside the GitHub organization corresponding to the GitHub organization folder with the GitHub credentials of the creator of the organization folder. Additionally, users with read access to the GitHub organization folder could read arbitrary file contents from the repositories inside the GitHub organization corresponding to the GitHub organization folder if the branch contained a Jenkinsfile (which could be created using the other part of this vulnerability), and they could provide the organization folder name, repository name, branch name, and file name. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7746 | 1 Netapp | 1 Data Ontap | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| NetApp Data ONTAP before 8.2.4, when operating in 7-Mode, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and (1) obtain sensitive information from or (2) modify volumes via vectors related to UTF-8 in the volume language. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1520 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Db2, Db2 Connect, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 9.7, 10,1, 10.5, and 11.1 is vulnerable to an unauthorized command that allows the database to be activated when authentication type is CLIENT. IBM X-Force ID: 129830. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10309 | 1 Ceragon | 2 Fibeair Ip-10, Fibeair Ip-10 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In the GUI of Ceragon FibeAir IP-10 (before 7.2.0) devices, a remote attacker can bypass authentication by adding an ALBATROSS cookie with the value 0-4-11 to their browser. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0803 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The WS-SP UsernameToken policy in Apache CXF 2.4.5 and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending an empty UsernameToken as part of a SOAP request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000110 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Blue Ocean | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Blue Ocean allows the creation of GitHub organization folders that are set up to scan a GitHub organization for repositories and branches containing a Jenkinsfile, and create corresponding pipelines in Jenkins. It did not properly check the current user's authentication and authorization when configuring existing GitHub organization folders. This allowed users with read access to the GitHub organization folder to reconfigure it, including changing the GitHub API endpoint for the organization folder to an attacker-controlled server to obtain the GitHub access token, if the organization folder was initially created using Blue Ocean. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3527 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users. | ||||