Filtered by vendor Pivotal Software
Subscriptions
Total
145 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-1834 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability was identified in the Cloud Foundry component Cloud Controller that affects cf-release versions prior to v208 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.4.2. Path traversal is the 'outbreak' of a given directory structure through relative file paths in the user input. It aims at accessing files and directories that are stored outside the web root folder, for disallowed reading or even executing arbitrary system commands. An attacker could use a certain parameter of the file path for instance to inject '../' sequences in order to navigate through the file system. In this particular case a remote authenticated attacker can exploit the identified vulnerability in order to upload arbitrary files to the server running a Cloud Controller instance - outside the isolated application container. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4468 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 238; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.4, 3.x before 3.3.0.2, and 3.4.x before 3.4.1; UAA BOSH before 11.2 and 12.x before 12.2; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.29 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.8 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Spring Framework, Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3189 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 3.7 Low |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v208 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.5 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier, old Password Reset Links are not expired after the user changes their current email address to a new one. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3190 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the UAA logout link is susceptible to an open redirect which allows an attacker to insert malicious web page as a redirect parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3191 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5170 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks on PWS and log a user into an arbitrary account by leveraging lack of CSRF checks. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5171 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| The password change functionality in Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire existing sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5172 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire password reset links. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5173 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving emails with password recovery links, aka "Cross Domain Referer Leakage." | ||||
| CVE-2014-0225 | 3 Pivotal Software, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Spring Framework, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When processing user provided XML documents, the Spring Framework 4.0.0 to 4.0.4, 3.0.0 to 3.2.8, and possibly earlier unsupported versions did not disable by default the resolution of URI references in a DTD declaration. This enabled an XXE attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4955 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal PCF Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.65, 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.48, 1.8.x versions prior to 1.8.28, and 1.9.x versions prior to 1.9.5. Several credentials were present in the logs for the Notifications errand in the PCF Elastic Runtime tile. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3084 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The UAA reset password flow in Cloud Foundry release v236 and earlier versions, UAA release v3.3.0 and earlier versions, all versions of Login-server, UAA release v10 and earlier versions and Pivotal Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.7.2 is vulnerable to a brute force attack due to multiple active codes at a given time. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0761 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Garden Linux, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Cloud Foundry Garden-Linux versions prior to v0.333.0 and Elastic Runtime 1.6.x version prior to 1.6.17 contain a flaw in managing container files during Docker image preparation that could be used to delete, corrupt or overwrite host files and directories, including other container filesystems on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0780 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| It was discovered that cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.5.x versions prior to 1.5.17 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18 do not properly enforce disk quotas in certain cases. An attacker could use an improper disk quota value to bypass enforcement and consume all the disk on DEAs/CELLs causing a potential denial of service for other applications. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0781 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 5 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The UAA OAuth approval pages in Cloud Foundry v208 to v231, Login-server v1.6 to v1.14, UAA v2.0.0 to v2.7.4.1, UAA v3.0.0 to v3.2.0, UAA-Release v2 to v7 and Pivotal Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are vulnerable to an XSS attack by specifying malicious java script content in either the OAuth scopes (SCIM groups) or SCIM group descriptions. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14390 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cf-deployment | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-deployment v0.35.0, a misconfiguration with Loggregator and syslog-drain causes logs to be drained to unintended locations. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14388 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Grootfs | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cloud Foundry Foundation GrootFS release 0.3.x versions prior to 0.30.0 do not validate DiffIDs, allowing specially crafted images to poison the grootfs volume cache. For example, this could allow an attacker to provide an image layer that GrootFS would consider to be the Ubuntu base layer. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4966 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31683 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Concourse | 2025-04-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| Concourse (7.x.y prior to 7.8.3 and 6.x.y prior to 6.7.9) contains an authorization bypass issue. A Concourse user can send a request with body including :team_name=team2 to bypass team scope check to gain access to certain resources belong to any other team. | ||||