Total
3561 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-42980 | 1 Tenda | 2 Fh1206, Fh1206 Firmware | 2024-08-16 | 7.5 High |
| Tenda FH1206 v02.03.01.35 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the page parameter in the frmL7ImForm function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42969 | 1 Tenda | 2 Fh1206, Fh1206 Firmware | 2024-08-16 | 7.5 High |
| Tenda FH1206 v02.03.01.35 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the page parameter in the fromSafeUrlFilter function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42951 | 1 Tenda | 2 Fh1201, Fh1201 Firmware | 2024-08-16 | 7.5 High |
| Tenda FH1201 v1.2.0.14 (408) was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the mit_pptpusrpw parameter in the fromWizardHandle function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42943 | 1 Tenda | 2 Fh1201, Fh1201 Firmware | 2024-08-16 | 7.5 High |
| Tenda FH1201 v1.2.0.14 (408) was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the PPPOEPassword parameter in the fromAdvSetWan function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7567 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 2 Micro850 Firmware, Micro870 Firmware | 2024-08-14 | N/A |
| A denial-of-service vulnerability exists via the CIP/Modbus port in the Rockwell Automation Micro850/870 (2080 -L50E/2080 -L70E). If exploited, the CIP/Modbus communication may be disrupted for short duration. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4003 | 1 Motorola | 2 Q14, Q14 Firmware | 2024-08-13 | 2.7 Low |
| A denial-of-service vulnerability could allow an authenticated user to trigger an internal service restart via a specially crafted API request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30170 | 2 Privx, Ssh | 2 Privx, Privx | 2024-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| PrivX before 34.0 allows data exfiltration and denial of service via the REST API. This is fixed in minor versions 33.1, 32.3, 31.3, and later, and in major version 34.0 and later, | ||||
| CVE-2024-26639 | 2024-06-20 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47575 | 2024-06-20 | 0.0 Low | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47574 | 2024-06-20 | 0.0 Low | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47573 | 2024-06-20 | 0.0 Low | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40433 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Openjdk, Rhel Aus and 3 more | 2024-02-17 | 4.9 Medium |
| ** REJECT ** This CVE ID has been rejected by its CNA as it was not a security issue. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3487 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-20 | 0.0 Low |
| Non Security Issue. See the binutils security policy for more details, https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt | ||||
| CVE-2021-3894 | 2023-11-07 | 0.0 Low | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2020-24980 | 2023-11-07 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2020-19715 | 1 Exiv2 | 1 Exiv2 | 2023-11-07 | 0.0 Low |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-13110 Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-13110. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-13110 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2019-10124 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-20710 | 2023-11-07 | 0.0 Low | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-6285. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-6285. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-6285 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2018-14038 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-7642. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-7642. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-7642 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2018-12700 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||