Total
3438 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-2411 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Zephyr's Bluetooth host declares a GATT characteristic as two consecutive attributes: a Characteristic Declaration whose permission is hard-coded to BT_GATT_PERM_READ, and a Characteristic Value attribute that carries the application-specified security permissions (e.g. BT_GATT_PERM_READ_ENCRYPT / READ_AUTHEN / READ_LESC). The public notify and indicate APIs explicitly accept either attribute, and passing the declaration is the documented, common idiom. Before sending each notification or indication, the host re-checks link security with bt_gatt_check_perm() against params->attr in gatt_notify(), gatt_indicate(), and gatt_notify_multiple_verify_params() (subsys/bluetooth/host/gatt.c). When the application passed the Characteristic Declaration attribute, the host correctly redirected the value handle but left params->attr pointing at the declaration, so the security check evaluated the declaration's permissions (no security required) instead of the value's. As a result the encryption/authentication/LESC requirement configured on the characteristic value was skipped. The Notify-Multiple path additionally used a mask that omitted the LE Secure Connections requirement. A remote peer triggers the disclosure by connecting (optionally without pairing or encryption) and writing the Client Characteristic Configuration descriptor to enable notifications or indications, causing the server to emit the protected value over a link that has not reached the required security level. The impact is information disclosure / access-control bypass for characteristic values the application intended to expose only over a secured link; exposure depends on the application declaring encrypt/authen-required notify/indicate characteristics and on the CCC being writable at a lower security tier. There is no memory-safety or availability impact. The fix adds bt_gatt_attr_resolve_value(), which maps a declaration attribute to the following value attribute before the permission check, and switches the Notify-Multiple path to the full BT_GATT_PERM_READ_ENCRYPT_MASK so the LESC requirement is also enforced. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16540 | 2026-08-03 | 7.5 High | ||
| The Simply Schedule Appointments WordPress plugin before 1.6.12.6 does not correctly restrict a bulk appointment operation to the requester's own records, allowing unauthenticated users to retrieve the personal data of all appointments across the site and, on premium editions, to permanently delete them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16064 | 2026-08-03 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 5.3.7 does not properly verify authorization on the object being modified when quick-editing events, only checking a global capability, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to modify the title and publication status of arbitrary posts and pages on the site, including content they do not own. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68930 | 1 Eugeny | 1 Russh | 2026-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Russh is a Rust SSH client & server library. Prior to 0.62.5, russh dispatches channel-scoped Handler callbacks for recipient channel IDs that were never opened or confirmed in russh/src/server/encrypted.rs, server_read_authenticated, and the exec_request callback. Version 0.62.5 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17568 | 1 Devolutions | 1 Server | 2026-08-03 | 8.8 High |
| Improper access control in the role membership management endpoint in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated non-administrative user holding the user-group membership management permission to escalate privileges to administrator via a crafted API request. This issue affects : * Devolutions Server 2026.2.4.0 through 2026.2.12.0 * Devolutions Server 2026.1.23.0 and earlier | ||||
| CVE-2026-15254 | 2 Nsqua, Wordpress | 2 Simply Schedule Appointments, Wordpress | 2026-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Simply Schedule Appointments WordPress plugin before 1.6.12.11 does not perform a capability check on an administrative appointment-listing shortcode, and its per-user result scoping fails open for non-staff users, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to disclose all customers' appointment records, including names, email addresses, phone numbers and notes, across the whole site. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43672 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-08-03 | 7.1 High |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6. A malicious application may be able to bypass Privacy preferences. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47996 | 1 Adobe | 4 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin and 1 more | 2026-08-03 | 7.6 High |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47998 | 1 Adobe | 4 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin and 1 more | 2026-08-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47988 | 1 Adobe | 4 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin and 1 more | 2026-08-03 | 8.6 High |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47997 | 1 Adobe | 4 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin and 1 more | 2026-08-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47984 | 1 Adobe | 4 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Adobe Commerce Webhooks Plugin and 1 more | 2026-08-03 | 8.2 High |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68581 | 2 Go-vikunja, Vikunja | 2 Vikunja, Vikunja | 2026-08-03 | 8.1 High |
| Vikunja versions 0.22.0 through 2.3.0 fail to validate the principal type in API token management. Because user IDs and link-share IDs are independent numeric sequences and both resolve through a generic web.Auth.GetID() interface, a link-share JWT whose numeric ID equals a target user's ID is treated as that user by the /api/v1/tokens endpoints. An authenticated attacker can obtain a target's numeric user ID via authenticated user search, then create link shares on an attacker-writable project until the link-share sequence reaches that value, and use the resulting link-share JWT to list, create, and delete the target user's API tokens (including issuing a new token with attacker-chosen scopes under the target's permissions). Fixed in version 2.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14929 | 2026-08-03 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The JS Help Desk WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not verify ownership of the targeted reply before updating it, allowing any authenticated user (Subscriber and above) to overwrite the content of any support-ticket reply on the site. | ||||
| CVE-2026-60663 | 1 Oracle | 1 Webcenter Content | 2026-08-02 | 9.9 Critical |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Content product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Web Content Management). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Content. While the vulnerability is in Oracle WebCenter Content, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Content. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-17039 | 1 Redhat | 3 Certificate System, Dogtag Certificate System, Enterprise Linux | 2026-08-02 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in pki-core. The certificate authority (CA) renewal request path does not perform the realm-based authorization check that the enrollment path performs, allowing an authenticated user entitled to one realm to cause a certificate belonging to a different realm to be renewed without that realm's authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14537 | 1 Google | 1 Mcp-toolbox | 2026-08-02 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization in the direct HTTP API tool invocation endpoint in Google mcp-toolbox versions v1.3.0 and v1.4.0 allows an unauthenticated attacker to invoke tools protected by the scopeRequired feature via sending tool invocation requests through legacy HTTP endpoints when the --enable-api flag is active. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14538 | 1 Google | 1 Mcp-toolbox | 2026-08-02 | N/A |
| An improper authorization and security-boundary bypass vulnerability in the bigquery-execute-sql tool component of Google mcp-toolbox versions 0.16.1 through 1.4.0 allows an authenticated attacker to bypass allowedDatasets validation checks. The toolbox relies on the BigQuery dry-run API to enforce dataset restrictions, but due to a fail-open logic flaw, it bypasses validation when the API returns an empty array for specialized constructs. This allows the attacker to extract structural DDL schemas for explicitly excluded datasets via INFORMATION_SCHEMA, and access downstream federated row data via EXTERNAL_QUERY connections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18203 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the group policy evaluation logic of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. When a group policy is set to extend permissions to child groups, the system incorrectly uses a simple text-based prefix check to verify group membership. This allows a user who belongs to a different group with a similar starting name to bypass security checks and gain unauthorized access to administrative functions or protected resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18572 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Keycloak provides authorization services that allow administrators to restrict access to resources based on time policies (for example, only allowing access during business hours). A flaw was discovered where a user can include a fake time value in their authorization request that overrides the actual server time. This allows the user to bypass these time-based restrictions and access protected resources at unauthorized times. | ||||