Filtered by vendor Keepassxc
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Keepassxc
Subscriptions
Total
4 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-4158 | 1 Keepassxc | 1 Keepassxc | 2026-04-13 | N/A |
| KeePassXC OpenSSL Configuration Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of KeePassXC. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of OpenSSL. The product loads configuration from an unsecured location. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of KeePassXC when run by a target user on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-29156. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33900 | 1 Keepassxc | 1 Keepassxc | 2025-06-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| KeePassXC 2.7.7 allows an attacker (who has the privileges of the victim) to recover cleartext credentials via a memory dump. NOTE: the vendor disputes this because memory-management constraints make this unavoidable in the current design and other realistic designs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33901 | 1 Keepassxc | 1 Keepassxc | 2025-06-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Issue in KeePassXC 2.7.7 allows an attacker (who has the privileges of the victim) to recover some passwords stored in the .kdbx database via a memory dump. NOTE: the vendor disputes this because memory-management constraints make this unavoidable in the current design and other realistic designs. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35866 | 1 Keepassxc | 1 Keepassxc | 2024-12-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| In KeePassXC through 2.7.5, a local attacker can make changes to the Database security settings, including master password and second-factor authentication, within an authenticated KeePassXC Database session, without the need to authenticate these changes by entering the password and/or second-factor authentication to confirm changes. NOTE: the vendor's position is "asking the user for their password prior to making any changes to the database settings adds no additional protection against a local attacker." | ||||
Page 1 of 1.