Filtered by vendor Netapp
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Clustered Data Ontap
Subscriptions
Total
190 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-27538 | 7 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 16 Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux, Fedora and 13 more | 2025-06-09 | 7.7 High |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in libcurl prior to v8.0.0 where it reuses a previously established SSH connection despite the fact that an SSH option was modified, which should have prevented reuse. libcurl maintains a pool of previously used connections to reuse them for subsequent transfers if the configurations match. However, two SSH settings were omitted from the configuration check, allowing them to match easily, potentially leading to the reuse of an inappropriate connection. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22945 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 25 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 22 more | 2025-06-09 | 9.1 Critical |
| When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl <= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer to an already freed memory area and both use that again in a subsequent call to send data and also free it *again*. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22924 | 8 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 5 more | 55 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libcurl and 52 more | 2025-06-09 | 3.7 Low |
| libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse, if one of them matches the setup.Due to errors in the logic, the config matching function did not take 'issuercert' into account and it compared the involved paths *case insensitively*,which could lead to libcurl reusing wrong connections.File paths are, or can be, case sensitive on many systems but not all, and caneven vary depending on used file systems.The comparison also didn't include the 'issuer cert' which a transfer can setto qualify how to verify the server certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21985 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2025-05-29 | 7.6 High |
| ONTAP 9 versions prior to 9.9.1P18, 9.10.1P16, 9.11.1P13, 9.12.1P10 and 9.13.1P4 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated user with multiple remote accounts with differing roles to perform actions via REST API beyond their intended privilege. Possible actions include viewing limited configuration details and metrics or modifying limited settings, some of which could result in a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2015-7848 | 2 Netapp, Ntp | 6 Clustered Data Ontap, Data Ontap Operating In 7-mode, Oncommand Balance and 3 more | 2025-05-23 | 7.5 High |
| An integer overflow can occur in NTP-dev.4.3.70 leading to an out-of-bounds memory copy operation when processing a specially crafted private mode packet. The crafted packet needs to have the correct message authentication code and a valid timestamp. When processed by the NTP daemon, it leads to an immediate crash. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40438 | 11 Apache, Broadcom, Debian and 8 more | 45 Http Server, Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux and 42 more | 2025-05-16 | 9 Critical |
| A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23241 | 1 Netapp | 1 Clustered Data Ontap | 2025-05-09 | 8.1 High |
| Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.11.1 through 9.11.1P2 with SnapLock configured FlexGroups are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated remote attacker to arbitrarily modify or delete WORM data prior to the end of the retention period. | ||||
| CVE-2018-2826 | 3 Canonical, Netapp, Oracle | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Cloud Backup, Clustered Data Ontap and 15 more | 2025-05-06 | 8.3 High |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Libraries). The supported version that is affected is Java SE: 10. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Java SE, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2018-2825 | 3 Canonical, Netapp, Oracle | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Cloud Backup, Clustered Data Ontap and 15 more | 2025-05-06 | 8.3 High |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Libraries). The supported version that is affected is Java SE: 10. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Java SE, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2022-35252 | 6 Apple, Debian, Haxx and 3 more | 21 Macos, Debian Linux, Curl and 18 more | 2025-05-05 | 3.7 Low |
| When curl is used to retrieve and parse cookies from a HTTP(S) server, itaccepts cookies using control codes that when later are sent back to a HTTPserver might make the server return 400 responses. Effectively allowing a"sister site" to deny service to all siblings. | ||||
| CVE-2022-32208 | 7 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 21 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 18 more | 2025-05-05 | 5.9 Medium |
| When curl < 7.84.0 does FTP transfers secured by krb5, it handles message verification failures wrongly. This flaw makes it possible for a Man-In-The-Middle attack to go unnoticed and even allows it to inject data to the client. | ||||
| CVE-2022-32206 | 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 4 more | 35 Debian Linux, Fedora, Curl and 32 more | 2025-05-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| curl < 7.84.0 supports "chained" HTTP compression algorithms, meaning that a serverresponse can be compressed multiple times and potentially with different algorithms. The number of acceptable "links" in this "decompression chain" was unbounded, allowing a malicious server to insert a virtually unlimited number of compression steps.The use of such a decompression chain could result in a "malloc bomb", makingcurl end up spending enormous amounts of allocated heap memory, or trying toand returning out of memory errors. | ||||
| CVE-2022-32205 | 7 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 29 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 26 more | 2025-05-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A malicious server can serve excessive amounts of `Set-Cookie:` headers in a HTTP response to curl and curl < 7.84.0 stores all of them. A sufficiently large amount of (big) cookies make subsequent HTTP requests to this, or other servers to which the cookies match, create requests that become larger than the threshold that curl uses internally to avoid sending crazy large requests (1048576 bytes) and instead returns an error.This denial state might remain for as long as the same cookies are kept, match and haven't expired. Due to cookie matching rules, a server on `foo.example.com` can set cookies that also would match for `bar.example.com`, making it it possible for a "sister server" to effectively cause a denial of service for a sibling site on the same second level domain using this method. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23852 | 7 Debian, Libexpat Project, Netapp and 4 more | 10 Debian Linux, Libexpat, Clustered Data Ontap and 7 more | 2025-05-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has a signed integer overflow in XML_GetBuffer, for configurations with a nonzero XML_CONTEXT_BYTES. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23308 | 7 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 46 Ipados, Iphone Os, Mac Os X and 43 more | 2025-05-05 | 7.5 High |
| valid.c in libxml2 before 2.9.13 has a use-after-free of ID and IDREF attributes. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1473 | 3 Netapp, Openssl, Redhat | 44 A250, A250 Firmware, A700s and 41 more | 2025-05-05 | 7.5 High |
| The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). | ||||
| CVE-2022-1343 | 3 Netapp, Openssl, Redhat | 44 A250, A250 Firmware, A700s and 41 more | 2025-05-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). | ||||
| CVE-2022-1292 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 3 more | 57 Debian Linux, Fedora, A250 and 54 more | 2025-05-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). | ||||
| CVE-2021-46143 | 5 Libexpat Project, Netapp, Redhat and 2 more | 10 Libexpat, Active Iq Unified Manager, Clustered Data Ontap and 7 more | 2025-05-05 | 8.1 High |
| In doProlog in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, an integer overflow exists for m_groupSize. | ||||
| CVE-2021-0127 | 2 Intel, Netapp | 755 Celeron G1610, Celeron G1610t, Celeron G1620 and 752 more | 2025-05-05 | 5.5 Medium |
| Insufficient control flow management in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable a denial of service via local access. | ||||