Total
3944 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-46774 | 1 Ibm | 2 Manage Application, Maximo Application Suite | 2025-02-26 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Manage Application 8.8.0 and 8.9.0 in the IBM Maximo Application Suite is vulnerable to incorrect default permissions which could give access to a user to actions that they should not have access to. IBM X-Force ID: 242953. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21460 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2025-02-26 | 4.4 Medium |
| Improper authentication in SecSettings prior to SMR Mar-2023 Release 1 allows attacker to reset the setting. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46773 | 1 Ibm | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak | 2025-02-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1024 | 1 Churchcrm | 1 Churchcrm | 2025-02-25 | 4.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in ChurchCRM 5.13.0 that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser via Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the EditEventAttendees.php page. This requires Administration privileges and affects the EID parameter. The flaw allows an attacker to steal session cookies, perform actions on behalf of an authenticated user, and gain unauthorized access to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21027 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-02-25 | 7.5 High |
| In multiple functions of PasspointXmlUtils.java, there is a possible authentication misconfiguration due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-216854451 | ||||
| CVE-2023-27482 | 1 Home-assistant | 2 Home-assistant, Supervisor | 2025-02-25 | 10 Critical |
| homeassistant is an open source home automation tool. A remotely exploitable vulnerability bypassing authentication for accessing the Supervisor API through Home Assistant has been discovered. This impacts all Home Assistant installation types that use the Supervisor 2023.01.1 or older. Installation types, like Home Assistant Container (for example Docker), or Home Assistant Core manually in a Python environment, are not affected. The issue has been mitigated and closed in Supervisor version 2023.03.1, which has been rolled out to all affected installations via the auto-update feature of the Supervisor. This rollout has been completed at the time of publication of this advisory. Home Assistant Core 2023.3.0 included mitigation for this vulnerability. Upgrading to at least that version is thus advised. In case one is not able to upgrade the Home Assistant Supervisor or the Home Assistant Core application at this time, it is advised to not expose your Home Assistant instance to the internet. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27582 | 1 Maddy Project | 1 Maddy | 2025-02-25 | 9.1 Critical |
| maddy is a composable, all-in-one mail server. Starting with version 0.2.0 and prior to version 0.6.3, maddy allows a full authentication bypass if SASL authorization username is specified when using the PLAIN authentication mechanisms. Instead of validating the specified username, it is accepted as is after checking the credentials for the authentication username. maddy 0.6.3 includes the fix for the bug. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55925 | 2025-02-24 | 7.5 High | ||
| In Xerox Workplace Suite, an API restricted to specific hosts can be bypassed by manipulating the Host header. If the server improperly validates or trusts the Host header without verifying the actual destination, an attacker can forge a value to gain unauthorized access. This exploit targets improper host validation, potentially exposing sensitive API endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2020-12812 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-02-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| An improper authentication vulnerability in SSL VPN in FortiOS 6.4.0, 6.2.0 to 6.2.3, 6.0.9 and below may result in a user being able to log in successfully without being prompted for the second factor of authentication (FortiToken) if they changed the case of their username. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33044 | 1 Dahuasecurity | 38 Ipc-hum7xxx, Ipc-hum7xxx Firmware, Ipc-hx3xxx and 35 more | 2025-02-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| The identity authentication bypass vulnerability found in some Dahua products during the login process. Attackers can bypass device identity authentication by constructing malicious data packets. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33045 | 1 Dahuasecurity | 36 Ipc-hum7xxx, Ipc-hum7xxx Firmware, Ipc-hx3xxx and 33 more | 2025-02-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| The identity authentication bypass vulnerability found in some Dahua products during the login process. Attackers can bypass device identity authentication by constructing malicious data packets. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5174 | 2025-02-24 | N/A | ||
| A flaw in Gliffy results in broken authentication through the reset functionality of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0981 | 1 Churchcrm | 1 Churchcrm | 2025-02-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in ChurchCRM 5.13.0 and prior that allows an attacker to hijack a user's session by exploiting a Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Group Editor page. This allows admin users to inject malicious JavaScript in the description field, which captures the session cookie of authenticated users. The cookie can then be sent to an external server, enabling session hijacking. It can also lead to information disclosure, as exposed session cookies can be used to impersonate users and gain unauthorised access to sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21543 | 2025-02-20 | 7.1 High | ||
| Versions of the package djoser before 2.3.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass when the authenticate() function fails. This is because the system falls back to querying the database directly, granting access to users with valid credentials, and eventually bypassing custom authentication checks such as two-factor authentication, LDAP validations, or requirements from configured AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35726 | 1 Yotuwp | 1 Video Gallery | 2025-02-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| Broken Authentication vulnerability in yotuwp Video Gallery plugin <= 1.3.4.5 at WordPress. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34839 | 1 Codexshaper | 1 Wp Oauth2 Server | 2025-02-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| Authentication Bypass vulnerability in CodexShaper's WP OAuth2 Server plugin <= 1.0.1 at WordPress. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28666 | 1 Yikesinc | 1 Custom Product Tabs For Woocommerce | 2025-02-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| Broken Access Control vulnerability in YIKES Inc. Custom Product Tabs for WooCommerce plugin <= 1.7.7 at WordPress leading to &yikes-the-content-toggle option update. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36296 | 1 Jumpdemand | 1 Activedemand | 2025-02-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| Broken Authentication vulnerability in JumpDEMAND Inc. ActiveDEMAND plugin <= 0.2.27 at WordPress allows unauthenticated post update/create/delete. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34149 | 1 Miniorange | 1 Wp Oauth Server | 2025-02-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Authentication Bypass vulnerability in miniOrange WP OAuth Server plugin <= 3.0.4 at WordPress. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40684 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortiproxy, Fortiswitchmanager | 2025-02-19 | 9.8 Critical |
| An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 allows an unauthenticated atttacker to perform operations on the administrative interface via specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||