Total
1556 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-50590 | 1 Hasomed | 1 Elefant | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Attackers with local access to the medical office computer can escalate their Windows user privileges to "NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM" by overwriting one of two Elefant service binaries with weak permissions. The default installation directory of Elefant is "C:\Elefant1" which is writable for all users. In addition, the Elefant installer registers two Firebird database services which are running as “NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM”. Path: C:\Elefant1\Firebird_2\bin\fbserver.exe Path: C:\Elefant1\Firebird_2\bin\fbguard.exe Both service binaries are user writable. This means that a local attacker can rename one of the service binaries, replace the service executable with a new executable, and then restart the system. Once the system has rebooted, the new service binary is executed as "NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM". | ||||
| CVE-2025-46185 | 1 Pgcodekeeper | 1 Pgcodekeeper | 2026-04-15 | 6.2 Medium |
| An Insecure Permission vulnerability in pgcodekeeper 10.12.0 allows a local attacker to obtain sensitive information via the plaintext storage of passwords and usernames. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12903 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Incorrect default permissions vulnerability in Evoko Home, affecting version 2.4.2 to 2.7.4. A non-admin user could exploit weak file and folder permissions to escalate privileges, execute arbitrary code and maintain persistence on the compromised machine. It has been identified that full control permissions exist on the ‘Everyone’ group (i.e. any user who has local access to the operating system regardless of their privileges). | ||||
| CVE-2025-41658 | 1 Codesys | 1 Control | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| CODESYS Runtime Toolkit-based products may expose sensitive files to local low-privileged operating system users due to default file permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-44786 | 1 Meabillis Cms | 1 Meabillis Cms | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect access control in Meabilis CMS 1.0 allows attackers to access other users' address books via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30977 | 1 Secnet Security Network Intelligent Ac Management System | 1 Secnet Security Network Intelligent Ac Management System | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| An issue in Secnet Security Network Intelligent AC Management System v.1.02.040 allows a local attacker to escalate privileges via the password component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53947 | 2 Cognex, Microsoft | 3 In-sight Camera Firmware, In-sight Explorer, Windows | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High |
| A local attacker with low privileges on the Windows system where the software is installed can exploit this vulnerability to corrupt sensitive data. A data folder is created with very weak privileges, allowing any user logged into the Windows system to modify its content. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20087 | 1 Intel | 2 C++ Compiler, Oneapi | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| Incorrect default permissions for some Intel(R) oneAPI DPC++/C++ Compiler software installers may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4280 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| MacOS version of Poedit bundles a Python interpreter that inherits the Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) permissions granted by the user to the main application bundle. An attacker with local user access can invoke this interpreter with arbitrary commands or scripts, leveraging the application's previously granted TCC permissions to access user's files in privacy-protected folders without triggering user prompts. Accessing other resources beyond previously granted TCC permissions will prompt the user for approval in the name of Poedit, potentially disguising attacker's malicious intent. This issue has been fixed in 3.6.3 version of Poedit. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4763 | 1 Lenovo | 2 Accessories And Display Manager, Display Control Center | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| An insecure driver vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Display Control Center (LDCC) and Lenovo Accessories and Display Manager (LADM) that could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges to kernel. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49202 | 1 Keyfactor | 1 Command | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| Keyfactor Command before 12.5.0 has Incorrect Access Control: access tokens are over permissioned, aka 64099. The fixed versions are 11.5.1.1, 11.5.2.1, 11.5.3.1, 11.5.4.5, 11.5.6.1, 11.6.0, 12.2.0.1, 12.3.0.1, 12.4.0.1, 12.5.0, and 24.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27153 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27151 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. The programs can be replaced by malicious programs by any local or remote attacker. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24864 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access permission of a specific folder issue exists in RemoteView Agent (for Windows) versions prior to v8.1.5.2. If this vulnerability is exploited, a non-administrative user on the remote PC may execute an arbitrary OS command with LocalSystem privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27152 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27150 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36511 | 1 Intel | 1 Memory And Storage Tool | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| Incorrect default permissions for some Intel(R) Memory and Storage Tool before version 2.5.2 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53813 | 2 Apple, Nozbe | 2 Macos, Nozbe | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The configuration of Nozbe on macOS, specifically the "RunAsNode" fuse enabled, allows a local attacker with unprivileged access to execute arbitrary code that inherits Nozbe TCC (Transparency, Consent, and Control) permissions. Acquired resource access is limited to previously granted permissions by the user. Access to other resources beyond granted-permissions requires user interaction with a system prompt asking for permission. This issue was fixed in version 2025.11 of Nozbe. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0543 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Local privilege escalation in G DATA Security Client due to incorrect assignment of privileges to directories. This vulnerability allows a local, unprivileged attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations by placing an arbitrary executable in a globally writable directory resulting in execution by the SetupSVC.exe service in the context of SYSTEM. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27148 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||