Total
294 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-4039 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gcc | 2025-02-13 | 4.8 Medium |
| **DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45285 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 4 Go, Devtools, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Using go get to fetch a module with the ".git" suffix may unexpectedly fallback to the insecure "git://" protocol if the module is unavailable via the secure "https://" and "git+ssh://" protocols, even if GOINSECURE is not set for said module. This only affects users who are not using the module proxy and are fetching modules directly (i.e. GOPROXY=off). | ||||
| CVE-2023-39368 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2025-02-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure of bus lock regulator for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via network access. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22655 | 2 Intel, Redhat | 12 3rd Gen Intel Xeon Scalable Processor Family, 4th Gen Intel Xeon Bronze Processors, 4th Gen Intel Xeon Gold Processors and 9 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure in some 3rd and 4th Generation Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46329 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Intel and 1 more | 11 Debian Linux, Fedora, Killer and 8 more | 2025-02-13 | 8.2 High |
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi software may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0411 | 1 7-zip | 1 7-zip | 2025-02-12 | 7.0 High |
| 7-Zip Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of 7-Zip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, 7-Zip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25456. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33942 | 1 Intel | 1 Data Center Manager | 2025-02-05 | 8.8 High |
| Protection mechanism failure in the Intel(R) DCM software before version 5.0 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33081 | 1 Intel | 60 Ssd 600p, Ssd 600p Firmware, Ssd 660p and 57 more | 2025-02-05 | 7.9 High |
| Protection mechanism failure in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD DC Products may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33079 | 1 Intel | 60 Ssd 600p, Ssd 600p Firmware, Ssd 660p and 57 more | 2025-02-05 | 4.1 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure in firmware for some Intel(R) SSD DC Products may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32409 | 1 Apple | 6 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 3 more | 2025-01-27 | 8.6 High |
| The issue was addressed with improved bounds checks. This issue is fixed in watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.8 and iPadOS 15.7.8, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5. A remote attacker may be able to break out of Web Content sandbox. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38217 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-01-27 | 5.4 Medium |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-41979 | 1 Intel | 1 Data Center Manager | 2025-01-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure in the Intel(R) DCM software before version 5.1 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via network access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0575 | 2025-01-21 | 3.9 Low | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in Union Bank of India Vyom 8.0.34 on Android and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Rooting Detection. The manipulation leads to protection mechanism failure. The attack needs to be approached locally. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30851 | 1 Cilium | 1 Cilium | 2025-01-16 | 2.6 Low |
| Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. This issue only impacts users who have a HTTP policy that applies to multiple `toEndpoints` AND have an allow-all rule in place that affects only one of those endpoints. In such cases, a wildcard rule will be appended to the set of HTTP rules, which could cause bypass of HTTP policies. This issue has been patched in Cilium 1.11.16, 1.12.9, and 1.13.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56439 | 1 Huawei | 1 Harmonyos | 2025-01-13 | 7.5 High |
| Access control vulnerability in the identity authentication module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28248 | 1 Cilium | 1 Cilium | 2025-01-09 | 7.2 High |
| Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.13.9 and prior to versions 1.13.13, 1.14.8, and 1.15.2, Cilium's HTTP policies are not consistently applied to all traffic in the scope of the policies, leading to HTTP traffic being incorrectly and intermittently forwarded when it should be dropped. This issue has been patched in Cilium 1.15.2, 1.14.8, and 1.13.13. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8811 | 1 Winzip | 1 Winzip | 2025-01-03 | 7.8 High |
| WinZip Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of WinZip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archive files. When opening an archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, WinZip removes the Mark-of-the-Web from the archive file. Following extraction, the extracted files also lack the Mark-of-the-Web. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-23983. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46976 | 2 Linuxfoundation, Redhat | 2 Backstage, Rhdh | 2025-01-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. An attacker with control of the contents of the TechDocs storage buckets is able to inject executable scripts in the TechDocs content that will be executed in the victim's browser when browsing documentation or navigating to an attacker provided link. This has been fixed in the 1.10.13 release of the `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-backend` package. users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35352 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 1 more | 2025-01-01 | 7.5 High |
| Windows Remote Desktop Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-43487 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 5 more | 2024-12-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||