Filtered by vendor Openssl
Subscriptions
Total
268 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-0014 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8h through 0.9.8q and 1.0.0 through 1.0.0c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash), and possibly obtain sensitive information in applications that use OpenSSL, via a malformed ClientHello handshake message that triggers an out-of-bounds memory access, aka "OCSP stapling vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2011-4109 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8s, when X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled, allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact by triggering failure of a policy check. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0027 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2333 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 5 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Integer underflow in OpenSSL before 0.9.8x, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0j, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1c, when TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, or DTLS is used with CBC encryption, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TLS packet that is not properly handled during a certain explicit IV calculation. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2686 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/evp/e_aes_cbc_hmac_sha1.c in the AES-NI functionality in the TLS 1.1 and 1.2 implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted CBC data. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0166 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 6 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8y, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0k, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d does not properly perform signature verification for OCSP responses, which allows remote OCSP servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an invalid key. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1165 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The mime_param_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8u and 1.x before 1.0.0h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-7250. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4354 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/bn/bn_nist.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8h on 32-bit platforms, as used in stunnel and other products, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, uses an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves, which allows remote attackers to obtain the private key of a TLS server via multiple handshake attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1945 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) subsystem in OpenSSL 1.0.0d and earlier, when the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) is used for the ECDHE_ECDSA cipher suite, does not properly implement curves over binary fields, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to determine private keys via a timing attack and a lattice calculation. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1473 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment | ||||
| CVE-2013-4353 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Rhev Manager | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The ssl3_take_mac function in ssl/s3_both.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1f allows remote TLS servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted Next Protocol Negotiation record in a TLS handshake. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0169 | 4 Openssl, Oracle, Polarssl and 1 more | 11 Openssl, Openjdk, Polarssl and 8 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0884 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The implementation of Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and PKCS #7 in OpenSSL before 0.9.8u and 1.x before 1.0.0h does not properly restrict certain oracle behavior, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to decrypt data via a Million Message Attack (MMA) adaptive chosen ciphertext attack. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0050 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.8s and 1.0.0f does not properly support DTLS applications, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via unspecified vectors related to an out-of-bounds read. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4108. | ||||
| CVE-2011-5095 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923. | ||||
| CVE-2010-4252 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 1.0.0c, when J-PAKE is enabled, does not properly validate the public parameters in the J-PAKE protocol, which allows remote attackers to bypass the need for knowledge of the shared secret, and successfully authenticate, by sending crafted values in each round of the protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4577 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) via an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with (1) IP address blocks or (2) Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4619 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Server Gated Cryptography (SGC) implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f does not properly handle handshake restarts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2010-1633 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| RSA verification recovery in the EVP_PKEY_verify_recover function in OpenSSL 1.x before 1.0.0a, as used by pkeyutl and possibly other applications, returns uninitialized memory upon failure, which might allow context-dependent attackers to bypass intended key requirements or obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6450 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The DTLS retransmission implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.0 before 1.0.0l and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1f does not properly maintain data structures for digest and encryption contexts, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger the use of a different context and cause a denial of service (application crash) by interfering with packet delivery, related to ssl/d1_both.c and ssl/t1_enc.c. | ||||