Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Db2
Subscriptions
Total
295 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-3473 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 9.1 before FP8 does not require the SETSESSIONUSER privilege for the SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION statement, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2008-1998 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 2 Db2, Windows | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The NNSTAT (aka SYSPROC.NNSTAT) procedure in IBM DB2 8 before FP16, 9.1 before FP4a, and 9.5 before FP1 on Windows allows remote authenticated users to overwrite arbitrary files via the log file parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2008-1997 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the ADMIN_SP_C2 procedure in IBM DB2 8 before FP16, 9.1 before FP4a, and 9.5 before FP1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. NOTE: the ADMIN_SP_C issue is already covered by CVE-2008-0699. | ||||
| CVE-2008-0699 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the ADMIN_SP_C procedure (SYSPROC.ADMIN_SP_C) in IBM DB2 UDB before 8.2 Fixpak 16, 9.1 before FP4a, and 9.5 before FP1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2008-1966 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the JAR file administration routines in the BSU JAVA subcomponent in IBM DB2 8 before FP16, 9.1 before FP4a, and 9.5 before FP1 allow remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (instance crash) via a call to the (1) RECOVERJAR or (2) REMOVE_JAR procedure with a crafted parameter, related to (a) sqlj.install_jar and (b) sqlj.replace_jar. | ||||
| CVE-2009-3472 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 8 before FP18, 9.1 before FP8, and 9.5 before FP4 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions, and update, insert, or delete table rows, via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2008-0698 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the DAS server in IBM DB2 UDB before 8.2 Fixpak 16 has unknown attack vectors, and an impact probably involving "invalid memory access." | ||||
| CVE-2007-1228 | 2 Ibm, Unix | 2 Db2, Unix | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 UDB 8.2 before Fixpak 7 (aka fixpack 14), and DB2 9 before Fix Pack 2, on UNIX allows the "fenced" user to access certain unauthorized directories. | ||||
| CVE-2008-3959 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 UDB 8.1 before FixPak 16, 8.2 before FixPak 9, and 9.1 before FixPak 4a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (instance crash) via a crafted SQLJRA packet within a CONNECT/ATTACH data stream that simulates a V7 client connect/attach request. | ||||
| CVE-2008-0696 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 UDB before 8.2 Fixpak 16 does not properly check authorization for the ALTER TABLE statement, which has unknown impact and attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2007-2582 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the DB2 JDBC Applet Server (DB2JDS) service in IBM DB2 9.x and earlier allow remote attackers to (1) execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet to the DB2JDS service on tcp/6789; and cause a denial of service via (2) an invalid LANG parameter or (2) a long packet that generates a "MemTree overflow." | ||||
| CVE-2009-4334 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The Self Tuning Memory Manager (STMM) component in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP8, 9.5 before FP5, and 9.7 before FP1 uses 0666 permissions for the STMM log file, which allows local users to cause a denial of service or have unspecified other impact by writing to this file. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4333 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The Relational Data Services component in IBM DB2 9.5 before FP5 allows attackers to obtain the password argument from the SET ENCRYPTION PASSWORD statement via vectors involving the GET SNAPSHOT FOR DYNAMIC SQL command. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4332 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| db2pd in the Problem Determination component in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP7 and 9.5 before FP5 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application termination) via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2008-3958 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 UDB 8 before Fixpak 17 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (instance crash) via a crafted CONNECT/ATTACH data stream that simulates a V7 client connect/attach request. NOTE: this may overlap CVE-2008-3858. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2008-3959. | ||||
| CVE-2007-1088 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM DB2 8.x before 8.1 FixPak 15 and 9.1 before Fix Pack 2 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long string in unspecified environment variables. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4331 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The Install component in IBM DB2 9.5 before FP5 and 9.7 before FP1 configures the High Availability (HA) scripts with incorrect file-permission and authorization settings, which has unknown impact and local attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2007-1087 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 8.x before 8.1 FixPak 15 and 9.1 before Fix Pack 2 does not properly terminate certain input strings, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified environment variables that trigger a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2007-3676 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 Universal Database (UDB) Administration Server (DAS) 8 before Fix Pack 16 and 9 before Fix Pack 4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via modified pointer values in unspecified remote administration requests, which triggers memory corruption or other invalid memory access. NOTE: this might be the same issue as CVE-2008-0698. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4326 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The RAND scalar function in the Common Code Infrastructure component in IBM DB2 9.5 before FP5 and 9.7 before FP1, when the Database Partitioning Feature (DPF) is used, produces "repeating" return values, which might allow attackers to defeat protection mechanisms based on randomization by predicting a value. | ||||