Total
36130 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-46010 | 1 Seacms | 1 Seacms | 2026-07-09 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in SeaCMS v.12.9 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands via the admin_safe.php component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45658 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-07-08 | 7.8 High |
| Improper access control in Windows BitLocker allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47641 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2016, Sharepoint Server 2019 | 2026-07-08 | 4.6 Medium |
| Improper input validation in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3144 | 1 Ibm | 1 Api Connect | 2026-07-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.0.3 uses default credentials which could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to the application before the system enforces a credential update. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55761 | 1 Portainer | 1 Portainer | 2026-07-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| Portainer Community Edition is a lightweight service delivery platform for containerized applications that can be used to manage Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes and ACI environments. In versions 2.39.0 through 2.39.3 and 2.40.0 until 2.43.0, unauthenticated restore and administrator initialization endpoints (/api/restore and /api/users/admin/init) remain accessible during the five-minute setup window for uninitialized instances, allowing a network attacker to restore a crafted backup or create the first administrator account and gain full administrative access. This issue is fixed in versions 2.39.4 and 2.43.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23668 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortiweb Manager, Fortiwebmanager | 2026-07-08 | 8.6 High |
| An improper authorization in Fortinet FortiWebManager 7.2.0, FortiWebManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiWebManager 6.3.0, FortiWebManager 6.2.3 through 6.2.4, FortiWebManager 6.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests or CLI. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23667 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortiweb Manager, Fortiwebmanager | 2026-07-08 | 7.6 High |
| An improper authorization in Fortinet FortiWebManager 7.2.0, FortiWebManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiWebManager 6.3.0, FortiWebManager 6.2.3 through 6.2.4, FortiWebManager 6.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests or CLI. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23670 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortiweb Manager, Fortiwebmanager | 2026-07-08 | 7.6 High |
| An improper authorization in Fortinet FortiWebManager 7.2.0, FortiWebManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiWebManager 6.3.0, FortiWebManager 6.2.3 through 6.2.4, FortiWebManager 6.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests or CLI. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45331 | 1 Fortinet | 5 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortianalyzercloud and 2 more | 2026-07-08 | 6.9 Medium |
| A incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.2, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.6, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions allows attacker to escalate privilege via specific shell commands | ||||
| CVE-2024-33503 | 1 Fortinet | 5 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortimanager and 2 more | 2026-07-08 | 6.7 Medium |
| A improper privilege management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.5, FortiManager Cloud 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions allows attacker to escalation of privilege via specific shell commands | ||||
| CVE-2026-48828 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-07-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Bulk Variables API in Apache Airflow called the redactor without passing the variable's key, so the key-based `should_hide_value_for_key` check (which triggers on secret-suffixed key names like `*_password` / `*_token` / `*_secret`) could not fire for JSON-decodable variable values. An authenticated UI/API user with bulk Variable read permission could retrieve plaintext values from JSON variables whose key would otherwise trigger redaction. Affects deployments that store sensitive values in JSON-typed Airflow Variables under secret-suffixed key names. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.3.0 or later (the fix landed on `main` after 3.2.2; no 3.2.x backport). | ||||
| CVE-2026-8147 | 2 Lfprojects, Mlflow | 2 Mlflow, Mlflow/mlflow | 2026-07-08 | 8.1 High |
| In MLflow versions prior to 3.14.0, when running with authentication enabled, the trace API endpoints lack proper authorization validators. This allows any authenticated user to bypass experiment-level authorization controls on all trace operations, including reading, deleting, and modifying traces on experiments they do not have permission to access. The issue arises from the `_before_request` handler, which does not register authorization validators for trace endpoints, resulting in requests proceeding without validation. This vulnerability can expose sensitive data, destroy audit logs, and allow unauthorized modifications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8924 | 2 Curl, Haxx | 2 Curl, Curl | 2026-07-07 | 9.1 Critical |
| A flaw in curl’s cookie parsing logic allows a malicious HTTP server to set 'super cookies' that bypass the Public Suffix List check. This enables an attacker-controlled origin to inject cookies that curl subsequently scopes and transmits to unrelated third-party domains. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9546 | 2 Curl, Haxx | 2 Curl, Curl | 2026-07-07 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in libcurl caused the HTTP `Referer:` header to persist even when explicitly cleared. While the documentation states that passing NULL to `CURLOPT_REFERER` suppresses the header, the option failed to clear the internal state. As a result the previous referrer string was erroneously reused and sent in subsequent requests, potentially leaking sensitive information to unintended servers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58523 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Android, Edge Chromium | 2026-07-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58286 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-07-07 | 8.1 High |
| Improper access control in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9545 | 2 Curl, Haxx | 2 Curl, Curl | 2026-07-06 | 7.5 High |
| In this scenario, libcurl first uses a proper HTTP/3 server for the initial transfers, and when it makes a second transfer to the same site it has been replaced by the attacker's impostor machine - without a valid certificate. When libcurl returns to the hostname the second time with a cached SSL session (`CURLOPT_SSL_SESSIONID_CACHE` is not disabled) and early data enabled (the `CURLSSLOPT_EARLYDATA` bit is set in `CURLOPT_SSL_OPTIONS`), libcurl might send off the second request's bytes on that new connection *before* enforcing the certificate verification failure. Potentially leaking sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58282 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-07-06 | 8.1 High |
| Improper access control in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26145 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Synapse | 2026-07-06 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper access control in Azure Synapse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57985 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-07-06 | 7.6 High |
| Improper input validation in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||