Filtered by vendor Nodejs Subscriptions
Filtered by product Node.js Subscriptions
Total 160 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2016-7052 3 Nodejs, Novell, Openssl 3 Node.js, Suse Linux Enterprise Module For Web Scripting, Openssl 2025-04-12 7.5 High
crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) by triggering a CRL operation.
CVE-2016-3956 3 Ibm, Nodejs, Npmjs 3 Sdk, Node.js, Npm 2025-04-12 7.5 High
The CLI in npm before 2.15.1 and 3.x before 3.8.3, as used in Node.js 0.10 before 0.10.44, 0.12 before 0.12.13, 4 before 4.4.2, and 5 before 5.10.0, includes bearer tokens with arbitrary requests, which allows remote HTTP servers to obtain sensitive information by reading Authorization headers.
CVE-2013-6668 4 Debian, Google, Nodejs and 1 more 7 Debian Linux, Chrome, V8 and 4 more 2025-04-12 N/A
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google V8 before 3.24.35.10, as used in Google Chrome before 33.0.1750.146, allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have other impact via unknown vectors.
CVE-2015-0278 3 Fedoraproject, Libuv Project, Nodejs 3 Fedora, Libuv, Node.js 2025-04-12 N/A
libuv before 0.10.34 does not properly drop group privileges, which allows context-dependent attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2015-6764 4 Debian, Google, Nodejs and 1 more 4 Debian Linux, Chrome, Node.js and 1 more 2025-04-12 9.8 Critical
The BasicJsonStringifier::SerializeJSArray function in json-stringifier.h in the JSON stringifier in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73, improperly loads array elements, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds memory access) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JavaScript code.
CVE-2016-1669 6 Canonical, Debian, Google and 3 more 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Chrome and 8 more 2025-04-12 8.8 High
The Zone::New function in zone.cc in Google V8 before 5.0.71.47, as used in Google Chrome before 50.0.2661.102, does not properly determine when to expand certain memory allocations, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JavaScript code.
CVE-2016-5180 6 C-ares, C-ares Project, Canonical and 3 more 6 C-ares, C-ares, Ubuntu Linux and 3 more 2025-04-12 9.8 Critical
Heap-based buffer overflow in the ares_create_query function in c-ares 1.x before 1.12.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a hostname with an escaped trailing dot.
CVE-2016-2105 8 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 5 more 20 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 17 more 2025-04-12 7.5 High
Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data.
CVE-2016-0702 5 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 2 more 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 3 more 2025-04-12 5.1 Medium
The MOD_EXP_CTIME_COPY_FROM_PREBUF function in crypto/bn/bn_exp.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not properly consider cache-bank access times during modular exponentiation, which makes it easier for local users to discover RSA keys by running a crafted application on the same Intel Sandy Bridge CPU core as a victim and leveraging cache-bank conflicts, aka a "CacheBleed" attack.
CVE-2016-6304 4 Nodejs, Novell, Openssl and 1 more 11 Node.js, Suse Linux Enterprise Module For Web Scripting, Openssl and 8 more 2025-04-12 7.5 High
Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions.
CVE-2016-6306 7 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 4 more 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Icewall Federation Agent and 8 more 2025-04-12 5.9 Medium
The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via crafted certificate operations, related to s3_clnt.c and s3_srvr.c.
CVE-2016-2107 8 Canonical, Debian, Google and 5 more 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Android and 15 more 2025-04-12 5.9 Medium
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169.
CVE-2016-2183 6 Cisco, Nodejs, Openssl and 3 more 14 Content Security Management Appliance, Node.js, Openssl and 11 more 2025-04-12 7.5 High
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.
CVE-2016-2178 7 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 4 more 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 7 more 2025-04-12 5.5 Medium
The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations, which makes it easier for local users to discover a DSA private key via a timing side-channel attack.
CVE-2013-2882 4 Debian, Google, Nodejs and 1 more 6 Debian Linux, Chrome, Node.js and 3 more 2025-04-11 N/A
Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.95, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via vectors that leverage "type confusion."
CVE-2023-23936 2 Nodejs, Redhat 4 Node.js, Undici, Enterprise Linux and 1 more 2025-03-10 6.5 Medium
Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client for Node.js. Starting with version 2.0.0 and prior to version 5.19.1, the undici library does not protect `host` HTTP header from CRLF injection vulnerabilities. This issue is patched in Undici v5.19.1. As a workaround, sanitize the `headers.host` string before passing to undici.
CVE-2025-23088 1 Nodejs 1 Node.js 2025-03-01 8.8 High
This Record was REJECTED after determining it is not in compliance with CVE Program requirements regarding assignment for vulnerabilities
CVE-2019-9517 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more 28 Http Server, Traffic Server, Mac Os X and 25 more 2025-01-14 7.5 High
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.
CVE-2019-9515 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more 2025-01-14 7.5 High
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
CVE-2019-9511 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more 2025-01-14 7.5 High
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.