Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform
Subscriptions
Total
206 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-2526 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.19, when sendfile is enabled for the HTTP APR or HTTP NIO connector, does not validate certain request attributes, which allows local users to bypass intended file access restrictions or cause a denial of service (infinite loop or JVM crash) by leveraging an untrusted web application. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1483 | 2 Hp, Redhat | 8 Network Node Manager I, Jboss Communications Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 5 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| wsf/common/DOMUtils.java in JBossWS Native in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.2.0.CP09, 4.3, and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 4.3.CP06 and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.2.CP05, 4.3.CP05, and 5.1.0; JBoss Communications Platform 1.2.11 and 5.1.1; JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5.1.0; and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform 5.1.1 does not properly handle recursion during entity expansion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted request containing an XML document with a DOCTYPE declaration and a large number of nested entity references, a similar issue to CVE-2003-1564. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1184 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not have the expected countermeasures against replay attacks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, related to lack of checking of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count or client nonce count) values. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5575 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Cxf, Fuse Esb Enterprise, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 5 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.5.x before 2.5.10, 2.6.x before CXF 2.6.7, and 2.7.x before CXF 2.7.4 does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting, which allows remote attackers to force CXF to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications, aka "XML Encryption backwards compatibility attack." | ||||
| CVE-2012-5629 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The default configuration of the (1) LdapLoginModule and (2) LdapExtLoginModule modules in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 4.3.0 CP10, 5.2.0, and 6.0.1, and Enterprise Web Platform (EWP) 5.2.0 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication via an empty password. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5783 | 3 Apache, Canonical, Redhat | 12 Httpclient, Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux and 9 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Commons HttpClient 3.x, as used in Amazon Flexible Payments Service (FPS) merchant Java SDK and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5885 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Data Grid and 5 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The replay-countermeasure functionality in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 tracks cnonce (aka client nonce) values instead of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count) values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22965 | 6 Cisco, Oracle, Redhat and 3 more | 45 Cx Cloud Agent, Commerce Platform, Communications Cloud Native Core Automated Test Suite and 42 more | 2025-04-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6291 | 1 Redhat | 18 Build Keycloak, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Data Grid and 15 more | 2025-04-04 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in the redirect_uri validation logic in Keycloak. This issue may allow a bypass of otherwise explicitly allowed hosts. A successful attack may lead to an access token being stolen, making it possible for the attacker to impersonate other users. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0231 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Mina, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Handling of the close_notify SSL/TLS message does not lead to a connection closure, leading the server to retain the socket opened and to have the client potentially receive clear text messages afterward. Mitigation: 2.0.20 users should migrate to 2.0.21, 2.1.0 users should migrate to 2.1.1. This issue affects: Apache MINA. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4639 | 1 Redhat | 14 Camel Quarkus, Camel Spring Boot, Integration and 11 more | 2025-02-07 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow, which incorrectly parses cookies with certain value-delimiting characters in incoming requests. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a cookie value to exfiltrate HttpOnly cookie values or spoof arbitrary additional cookie values, leading to unauthorized data access or modification. The main threat from this flaw impacts data confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2018-14667 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 2 more | 2025-02-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| The RichFaces Framework 3.X through 3.3.4 is vulnerable to Expression Language (EL) injection via the UserResource resource. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this to execute arbitrary code using a chain of java serialized objects via org.ajax4jsf.resource.UserResource$UriData. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1459 | 1 Redhat | 8 Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform and 5 more | 2024-11-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability was found in Undertow. This issue may allow a remote attacker to append a specially-crafted sequence to an HTTP request for an application deployed to JBoss EAP, which may permit access to privileged or restricted files and directories. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3223 | 1 Redhat | 21 Enterprise Linux, Integration, Jboss Data Grid and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in undertow. Servlets annotated with @MultipartConfig may cause an OutOfMemoryError due to large multipart content. This may allow unauthorized users to cause remote Denial of Service (DoS) attack. If the server uses fileSizeThreshold to limit the file size, it's possible to bypass the limit by setting the file name in the request to null. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4245 | 2 Codehaus-plexus, Redhat | 23 Plexus-utils, A Mq Clients, Amq Broker and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in codehaus-plexus. The org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.XmlWriterUtil#writeComment fails to sanitize comments for a --> sequence. This issue means that text contained in the command string could be interpreted as XML and allow for XML injection. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1415 | 1 Redhat | 16 Camel Quarkus, Camel Spring Boot, Decision Manager and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found where some utility classes in Drools core did not use proper safeguards when deserializing data. This flaw allows an authenticated attacker to construct malicious serialized objects (usually called gadgets) and achieve code execution on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42550 | 4 Netapp, Qos, Redhat and 1 more | 9 Cloud Manager, Service Level Manager, Snap Creator Framework and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.6 Medium |
| In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers. | ||||