Total
1561 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-0132 | 1 Framasoft | 1 Peertube | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| peertube is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2022-0086 | 1 Transloadit | 1 Uppy | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| uppy is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2022-0085 | 1 Dompdf Project | 1 Dompdf | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository dompdf/dompdf prior to 2.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4075 | 1 Snipeitapp | 1 Snipe-it | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 High |
| snipe-it is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2021-46107 | 1 Ligeo-archives | 1 Ligeo Basics | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Ligeo Archives Ligeo Basics as of 02_01-2022 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to read any documents via the download features. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45968 | 2 Jivesoftware, Pascom | 2 Jive, Cloud Phone System | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in xmppserver jar in the XMPP Server component of the JIve platform, as used in Pascom Cloud Phone System before 7.20.x (and in other products). An endpoint in the backend Tomcat server of the Pascom allows SSRF, a related issue to CVE-2019-18394. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45851 | 1 Frangoteam | 1 Fuxa | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack in FUXA 1.1.3 can be carried out leading to the obtaining of sensitive information from the server's internal environment and services, often potentially leading to the attacker executing commands on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45394 | 1 Html2pdf Project | 1 Html2pdf | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Spipu HTML2PDF before 5.2.4. Attackers can trigger deserialization of arbitrary data via the injection of a malicious <link> tag in the converted HTML document. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45325 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulneraility exists in Gitea before 1.7.0 using the OpenID URL. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44659 | 1 Thoughtworks | 1 Gocd | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Adding a new pipeline in GoCD server version 21.3.0 has a functionality that could be abused to do an un-intended action in order to achieve a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). NOTE: the vendor's position is that the observed behavior is not a vulnerability, because the product's design allows an admin to configure outbound requests | ||||
| CVE-2021-44224 | 7 Apache, Apple, Debian and 4 more | 15 Http Server, Mac Os X, Macos and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| A crafted URI sent to httpd configured as a forward proxy (ProxyRequests on) can cause a crash (NULL pointer dereference) or, for configurations mixing forward and reverse proxy declarations, can allow for requests to be directed to a declared Unix Domain Socket endpoint (Server Side Request Forgery). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.7 up to 2.4.51 (included). | ||||
| CVE-2021-44139 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Sentinel | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Sentinel 1.8.2 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2021-43959 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Jira Service Desk, Jira Service Management | 2024-11-21 | 5.7 Medium |
| Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Service Management Server and Data Center allow authenticated remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the CSV importing feature of JSM Insight. When running in an environment like Amazon EC2, this flaw may be used to access to a metadata resource that provides access credentials and other potentially confidential information. The affected versions are before version 4.13.20, from version 4.14.0 before 4.20.8, and from version 4.21.0 before 4.22.2. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43954 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Crucible, Fisheye | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| The DefaultRepositoryAdminService class in Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.8.9 allowed remote attackers, who have 'can add repository permission', to enumerate the existence of internal network and filesystem resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43780 | 1 Redash | 1 Redash | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| Redash is a package for data visualization and sharing. In versions 10.0 and priorm the implementation of URL-loading data sources like JSON, CSV, or Excel is vulnerable to advanced methods of Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). These vulnerabilities are only exploitable on installations where a URL-loading data source is enabled. As of time of publication, the `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches address this by applying the Advocate library for making http requests instead of the requests library directly. Users should upgrade to version 10.0.1 to receive this patch. There are a few workarounds for mitigating the vulnerability without upgrading. One can disable the vulnerable data sources entirely, by adding the following env variable to one's configuration, making them unavailable inside the webapp. One can switch any data source of certain types (viewable in the GitHub Security Advisory) to be `View Only` for all groups on the Settings > Groups > Data Sources screen. For users unable to update an admin may modify Redash's configuration through environment variables to mitigate this issue. Depending on the version of Redash, an admin may also need to run a CLI command to re-encrypt some fields in the database. The `master` and `release/10.x.x` branches as of time of publication have removed the default value for `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET`. All future releases will also require this to be set explicitly. For existing installations, one will need to ensure that explicit values are set for the `REDASH_COOKIE_SECRET` and `REDASH_SECRET_KEY `variables. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43562 | 1 Pixxio | 1 Pixx.io | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in the pixxio (aka pixx.io integration or DAM) extension before 1.0.6 for TYPO3. The extension fails to restrict the image download to the configured pixx.io DAM URL, resulting in SSRF. As a result, an attacker can download various content from a remote location and save it to a user-controlled filename, which may result in Remote Code Execution. A TYPO3 backend user account is required to exploit this. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43296 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Supportcenter Plus | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Zoho ManageEngine SupportCenter Plus before 11016 is vulnerable to an SSRF attack in ActionExecutor. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43293 | 1 Sonatype | 1 Nexus Repository Manager | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.36.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to potentially perform network enumeration via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2021-42637 | 1 Printerlogic | 1 Web Stack | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| PrinterLogic Web Stack versions 19.1.1.13 SP9 and below use user-controlled input to craft a URL, resulting in a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42091 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. SSRF can occur via GitHub or GitLab integration. | ||||