Total
4049 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-56139 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| pdftools is a high level tools to convert PDF files to ePUB formats. In versions up to and including 0.5.0 maliciously crafted epub files can cause a stack overflow leading to a crash. This issue has not yet been addressed and users are advised to avoid untrusted input to their systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41687 | 1 Weidmueller | 4 Ie-sr-2tx-wl, Ie-sr-2tx-wl-4g-eu, Ie-sr-2tx-wl-4g-us-v and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker may use a stack based buffer overflow in the u-link Management API to gain full access on the affected devices. | ||||
| CVE-2010-20122 | 1 Netsarang | 1 Xftp | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Xftp FTP Client version up to and including 3.0 (build 0238) contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability triggered by a maliciously crafted PWD response from an FTP server. When the client connects to a server and receives an overly long directory string in response to the PWD command, the client fails to properly validate the length of the input before copying it into a fixed-size buffer. This results in memory corruption and allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the client system. | ||||
| CVE-2013-10057 | 1 Synactis | 1 All In The Box.ocx | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Synactis PDF In-The-Box ActiveX control (PDF_IN_1.ocx), specifically the ConnectToSynactis method. When a long string is passed to this method—intended to populate the ldCmdLine argument of a WinExec call—a strcpy operation overwrites a saved TRegistry class pointer on the stack. This allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the user by enticing them to visit a malicious webpage that instantiates the vulnerable ActiveX control. The vulnerability was discovered via its use in third-party software such as Logic Print 2013. | ||||
| CVE-2012-10051 | 1 Photodex | 1 Proshow Producer | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Photodex ProShow Producer version 5.0.3256 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the handling of plugin load list files. When a specially crafted load file is placed in the installation directory, the application fails to properly validate its contents, leading to a buffer overflow when the file is parsed during startup. Exploitation requires local access to place the file and user interaction to launch the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55577 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Linux Ratfor 1.06 and earlier. When the software processes a file which is specially crafted by an attacker, arbitrary code may be executed. As a result, the attacker may obtain or alter information of the user environment or cause the user environment to become unusable. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37182 | 1 Troglobit | 1 Redir | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Redir 3.3 contains a stack overflow vulnerability in the doproxyconnect() function that allows attackers to crash the application by sending oversized input. Attackers can exploit the sprintf() buffer without proper length checking to overwrite memory and cause a segmentation fault, resulting in program termination. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45415 | 1 Zte | 10 Zxhn E1600 Firmware, Zxhn E2603 Firmware, Zxhn E2615 Firmware and 7 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The HTTPD binary in multiple ZTE routers has a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in check_data_integrity function. This function is responsible for validating the checksum of data in post request. The checksum is sent encrypted in the request, the function decrypts it and stores the checksum on the stack without validating it. An unauthenticated attacker can get RCE as root by exploiting this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51979 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| An authenticated attacker may trigger a stack based buffer overflow by performing a malformed request to either the HTTP service (TCP port 80), the HTTPS service (TCP port 443), or the IPP service (TCP port 631). The malformed request will contain an empty Origin header value and a malformed Referer header value. The Referer header value will trigger a stack based buffer overflow when the host value in the Referer header is processed and is greater than 64 bytes in length. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5401 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Experion Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Server receiving a malformed message based on a using the specified key values can cause a stack overflow vulnerability which could lead to an attacker performing remote code execution or causing a failure. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45414 | 1 Zte | 10 Zxhn E1600 Firmware, Zxhn E2603 Firmware, Zxhn E2615 Firmware and 7 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The HTTPD binary in multiple ZTE routers has a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in webPrivateDecrypt function. This function is responsible for decrypting RSA encrypted ciphertext, the encrypted data is supplied base64 encoded. The decoded ciphertext is stored on the stack without checking its length. An unauthenticated attacker can get RCE as root by exploiting this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51792 | 1 Mitre | 1 Caldera | 2026-04-15 | 3.3 Low |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in libde265 v1.0.12 allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via the allocation size exceeding the maximum supported size of 0x10000000000. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32061 | 1 Bosch | 1 Infotainment System Ecu | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The specific flaw exists within the Bluetooth stack developed by Alps Alpine of the Infotainment ECU manufactured by Bosch. The issue results from the lack of proper boundary validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a stack-based buffer overflow when receiving a specific packet on the established upper layer L2CAP channel. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to obtain remote code execution on the Infotainment ECU with root privileges. First identified on Nissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3286 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A buffer overflow vulnerability was identified in some Lenovo printers that could allow an unauthenticated user to trigger a device restart by sending a specially crafted web request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6073 | 1 Abb | 2 Rmc-100, Rmc-100-lite | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in ABB RMC-100, ABB RMC-100 LITE. When the REST interface is enabled by the user, and an attacker gains access to the control network, and user/password broker authentication is enabled, and CVE-2025-6074 is exploited, the attacker can overflow the buffer for username or password. This issue affects RMC-100: from 2105457-043 through 2105457-045; RMC-100 LITE: from 2106229-015 through 2106229-016. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41388 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Fuji Electric Smart Editor is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36435 | 1 Supermicro | 355 B12dpe-6 Firmware, B12dpt-6 Firmware, B12spe-cpu-25g Firmware and 352 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered on Supermicro BMC firmware in select X11, X12, H12, B12, X13, H13, and B13 motherboards (and CMM6 modules). An unauthenticated user can post crafted data to the interface that triggers a stack buffer overflow, and may lead to arbitrary remote code execution on a BMC. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53418 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| Delta Electronics COMMGR has Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6072 | 1 Abb | 2 Rmc-100, Rmc-100-lite | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in ABB RMC-100, ABB RMC-100 LITE. When the REST interface is enabled by the user, and an attacker gains access to the control network, and CVE-2025-6074 is exploited, the attacker can use the JSON configuration to overflow the date of expiration field.This issue affects RMC-100: from 2105457-043 through 2105457-045; RMC-100 LITE: from 2106229-015 through 2106229-016. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43661 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The <redacted>.so library, which is used by <redacted>, is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion of certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a long file path to the <redacted> action of the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or to the <redacted>.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this file path to <redacted>, which is then read by <redacted>.so This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701. Likelihood: Moderate – An attacker will have to find this exploit by either obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial and error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege) account to gain access to the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or <redacted>.sh script to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access send an HTTP request that triggers it. Impact: High – The <redacted> process, which we assume is responsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after performing the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow causes the process to segfault before <redacted> is removed. This means that, even though <redacted> is automatically restarted, it will crash again as soon as it tries to parse the text file. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I). | ||||