Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Jboss Fuse
Subscriptions
Total
568 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5645 | 4 Apache, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 86 Log4j, Oncommand Api Services, Oncommand Insight and 83 more | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8749 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Camel's Jackson and JacksonXML unmarshalling operation are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5643 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8028 | 3 Debian, Pivotal Software, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Spring-ldap, Jboss Amq and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Pivotal Spring-LDAP versions 1.3.0 - 2.3.1, when connected to some LDAP servers, when no additional attributes are bound, and when using LDAP BindAuthenticator with org.springframework.ldap.core.support.DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy as the authentication strategy, and setting userSearch, authentication is allowed with an arbitrary password when the username is correct. This occurs because some LDAP vendors require an explicit operation for the LDAP bind to take effect. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5653 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5656 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF's STSClient before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 uses a flawed way of caching tokens that are associated with delegation tokens, which means that an attacker could craft a token which would return an identifer corresponding to a cached token for another user. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9879 | 3 Ibm, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Websphere Application Server, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security before 3.2.10, 4.1.x before 4.1.4, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1. Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed. Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath(), and getPathInfo(). Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified. Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected. Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0363 | 2 Igniterealtime, Redhat | 4 Smack, Jboss Bpms, Jboss Brms and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ServerTrustManager component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify basicConstraints and nameConstraints in X.509 certificate chains from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate chain. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0364 | 2 Igniterealtime, Redhat | 4 Smack, Jboss Bpms, Jboss Brms and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ParseRoster component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify the from attribute of a roster-query IQ stanza, which allows remote attackers to spoof IQ responses via a crafted attribute. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0782 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Activemq, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The administration web console in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.11.4, 5.12.x before 5.12.3, and 5.13.x before 5.13.2 allows remote authenticated users to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks and consequently obtain sensitive information from a Java memory dump via vectors related to creating a queue. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9177 | 2 Redhat, Sparkjava | 3 Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse, Spark | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Spark 2.5 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the URI. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0193 | 2 Netty, Redhat | 10 Netty, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 7 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| WebSocket08FrameDecoder in Netty 3.6.x before 3.6.9, 3.7.x before 3.7.1, 3.8.x before 3.8.2, 3.9.x before 3.9.1, and 4.0.x before 4.0.19 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a TextWebSocketFrame followed by a long stream of ContinuationWebSocketFrames. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7940 | 4 Bouncycastle, Opensuse, Oracle and 1 more | 9 Bouncy Castle Crypto Package, Leap, Opensuse and 6 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." | ||||
| CVE-2014-0168 | 2 Jolokia, Redhat | 3 Jolokia, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jolokia before 1.2.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that execute MBeans methods via a crafted web page. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5348 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Camel, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Camel 2.6.x through 2.14.x, 2.15.x before 2.15.5, and 2.16.x before 2.16.1, when using (1) camel-jetty or (2) camel-servlet as a consumer in Camel routes, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5344 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Camel, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The camel-xstream component in Apache Camel before 2.15.5 and 2.16.x before 2.16.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5254 | 3 Apache, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 5 Activemq, Fedora, Jboss Amq and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.13.0 does not restrict the classes that can be serialized in the broker, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java Message Service (JMS) ObjectMessage object. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0110 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 7 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache CXF before 2.6.14 and 2.7.x before 2.7.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (/tmp disk consumption) via a large invalid SOAP message. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0109 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 7 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache CXF before 2.6.14 and 2.7.x before 2.7.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large request with the Content-Type set to text/html to a SOAP endpoint, which triggers an error. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9878 | 3 Pivotal Software, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Spring Framework, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.18, 4.2.x before 4.2.9, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5. Paths provided to the ResourceServlet were not properly sanitized and as a result exposed to directory traversal attacks. | ||||