Total
7703 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2017-10680 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to change a private album to public via a crafted request. | ||||
CVE-2017-10681 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to unlock albums via a crafted request. | ||||
CVE-2017-10961 | 1 Vanderbilt | 1 Redcap | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
REDCap before 7.5.1 has CSRF in the deletion feature of the File Repository and File Upload components. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000069 | 1 Oauth2 Proxy Project | 1 Oauth2 Proxy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
CSRF in Bitly oauth2_proxy 2.1 during authentication flow | ||||
CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000091 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
GitHub Branch Source Plugin connects to a user-specified GitHub API URL (e.g. GitHub Enterprise) as part of form validation and completion (e.g. to verify Scan Credentials are correct). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to any web server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000092 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Git, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Git Plugin connects to a user-specified Git repository as part of form validation. An attacker with no direct access to Jenkins but able to guess at a username/password credentials ID could trick a developer with job configuration permissions into following a link with a maliciously crafted Jenkins URL which would result in the Jenkins Git client sending the username and password to an attacker-controlled server. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000147 | 1 Mahara | 1 Mahara | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Mahara 1.9 before 1.9.8 and 1.10 before 1.10.6 and 15.04 before 15.04.3 are vulnerable to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on the uploader contained in Mahara's filebrowser widget. This could allow an attacker to trick a Mahara user into unknowingly uploading malicious files into their Mahara account. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000224 | 1 Embedplus | 1 Youtube | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
CSRF in YouTube (WordPress plugin) could allow unauthenticated attacker to change any setting within the plugin | ||||
CVE-2016-9455 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A number of scripts in Revive Adserver's user interface are vulnerable to CSRF attacks: `www/admin/banner-acl.php`, `www/admin/banner-activate.php`, `www/admin/banner-advanced.php`, `www/admin/banner-modify.php`, `www/admin/banner-swf.php`, `www/admin/banner-zone.php`, `www/admin/tracker-modify.php`. | ||||
CVE-2016-9456 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The Revive Adserver team conducted a security audit of the admin interface scripts in order to identify and fix other potential CSRF vulnerabilities. Over 20+ such issues were fixed. | ||||
CVE-2016-9714 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Master Data Management Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 10.1, 11.0, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, and 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 119727. | ||||
CVE-2016-9716 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Master Data Management Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 11.0, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, and 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 119729. | ||||
CVE-2016-9730 | 1 Ibm | 2 Qradar Incident Forensics, Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
IBM QRadar Incident Forensics 7.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 1999549. | ||||
CVE-2016-9975 | 1 Ibm | 2 Dashboard Application Services Hub, Jazz For Service Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
IBM Jazz for Service Management 1.1.2.1 and 1.1.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 1998714. | ||||
CVE-2016-9991 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Selling And Fulfillment Foundation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
IBM Sterling Order Management 9.2 through 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 121314. | ||||
CVE-2017-0045 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Windows DVD Maker in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows Vista SP2 does not properly parse crafted .msdvd files, which allows attackers to obtain information to compromise a target system, aka "Windows DVD Maker Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability." | ||||
CVE-2016-8737 | 1 Apache | 1 Brooklyn | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Apache Brooklyn before 0.10.0, the REST server is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF), which could permit a malicious web site to produce a link which, if clicked whilst a user is logged in to Brooklyn, would cause the server to execute the attacker's commands as the user. There is known to be a proof-of-concept exploit using this vulnerability. | ||||
CVE-2016-8941 | 1 Ibm | 2 Spectrum Control, Tivoli Storage Productivity Center | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
CVE-2016-9092 | 1 Symantec | 2 Content Analysis, Mail Threat Defense | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user. |