Filtered by vendor Vmware
Subscriptions
Total
905 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2017-4926 | 1 Vmware | 1 Vcenter Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware vCenter Server (6.5 prior to 6.5 U1) contains a vulnerability that may allow for stored cross-site scripting (XSS). An attacker with VC user privileges can inject malicious java-scripts which will get executed when other VC users access the page. | ||||
CVE-2017-4928 | 1 Vmware | 1 Vcenter Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
The flash-based vSphere Web Client (6.0 prior to 6.0 U3c and 5.5 prior to 5.5 U3f) i.e. not the new HTML5-based vSphere Client, contains SSRF and CRLF injection issues due to improper neutralization of URLs. An attacker may exploit these issues by sending a POST request with modified headers towards internal services leading to information disclosure. | ||||
CVE-2017-4929 | 1 Vmware | 1 Nsx Edge | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware NSX Edge (6.2.x before 6.2.9 and 6.3.x before 6.3.5) contains a moderate Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issue which may lead to information disclosure. | ||||
CVE-2017-4930 | 1 Vmware | 1 Airwatch | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware AirWatch Console 9.x prior to 9.2.0 contains a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated AWC user to add a malicious URL to an enrolled device's 'Links' page. Successful exploitation of this issue could result in an unsuspecting AWC user being redirected to a malicious URL. | ||||
CVE-2017-4931 | 1 Vmware | 1 Airwatch | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware AirWatch Console 9.x prior to 9.2.0 contains a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated AWC user to add malicious data to an enrolled device's log files. Successful exploitation of this issue could result in an unsuspecting AWC user opening a CSV file which contains malicious content. | ||||
CVE-2017-4932 | 2 Google, Vmware | 2 Android, Airwatch Launcher | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware AirWatch Launcher for Android prior to 3.2.2 contains a vulnerability that could allow an escalation of privilege from the launcher UI context menu to native UI functionality and privilege. Successful exploitation of this issue could result in an escalation of privilege. | ||||
CVE-2017-4934 | 1 Vmware | 2 Fusion, Workstation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware Workstation (12.x before 12.5.8) and Fusion (8.x before 8.5.9) contain a heap buffer-overflow vulnerability in VMNAT device. This issue may allow a guest to execute code on the host. | ||||
CVE-2017-4936 | 1 Vmware | 2 Horizon View, Workstation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware Workstation (12.x before 12.5.8) and Horizon View Client for Windows (4.x before 4.6.1) contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in JPEG2000 parser in the TPView.dll. On Workstation, this may allow a guest to execute code or perform a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs Workstation. In the case of a Horizon View Client, this may allow a View desktop to execute code or perform a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs the Horizon View Client. | ||||
CVE-2017-4937 | 1 Vmware | 2 Horizon View, Workstation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware Workstation (12.x before 12.5.8) and Horizon View Client for Windows (4.x before 4.6.1) contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in JPEG2000 parser in the TPView.dll. On Workstation, this may allow a guest to execute code or perform a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs Workstation. In the case of a Horizon View Client, this may allow a View desktop to execute code or perform a Denial of Service on the Windows OS that runs the Horizon View Client. Exploitation is only possible if virtual printing has been enabled. This feature is not enabled by default on Workstation but it is enabled by default on Horizon View Client. | ||||
CVE-2017-4938 | 1 Vmware | 2 Fusion, Workstation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware Workstation (12.x before 12.5.8) and Fusion (8.x before 8.5.9) contain a guest RPC NULL pointer dereference vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this issue may allow attackers with normal user privileges to crash their VMs. | ||||
CVE-2017-4939 | 1 Vmware | 1 Workstation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
VMware Workstation (12.x before 12.5.8) installer contains a DLL hijacking issue that exists due to some DLL files loaded by the application improperly. This issue may allow an attacker to load a DLL file of the attacker's choosing that could execute arbitrary code. | ||||
CVE-2017-4940 | 1 Vmware | 1 Esxi | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
The ESXi Host Client in VMware ESXi (6.5 before ESXi650-201712103-SG, 5.5 before ESXi600-201711103-SG and 5.5 before ESXi550-201709102-SG) contains a vulnerability that may allow for stored cross-site scripting (XSS). An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by injecting Javascript, which might get executed when other users access the Host Client. | ||||
CVE-2017-4942 | 1 Vmware | 1 Airwatch Console | 2025-04-20 | 4.9 Medium |
VMware AirWatch Console (AWC) contains a Broken Access Control vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this issue could result in end-user device details being disclosed to an unauthorized administrator. | ||||
CVE-2017-4995 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | 8.1 High |
An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security 4.2.0.RELEASE through 4.2.2.RELEASE, and Spring Security 5.0.0.M1. When configured to enable default typing, Jackson contained a deserialization vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary code execution. Jackson fixed this vulnerability by blacklisting known "deserialization gadgets." Spring Security configures Jackson with global default typing enabled, which means that (through the previous exploit) arbitrary code could be executed if all of the following is true: (1) Spring Security's Jackson support is being leveraged by invoking SecurityJackson2Modules.getModules(ClassLoader) or SecurityJackson2Modules.enableDefaultTyping(ObjectMapper); (2) Jackson is used to deserialize data that is not trusted (Spring Security does not perform deserialization using Jackson, so this is an explicit choice of the user); and (3) there is an unknown (Jackson is not blacklisting it already) "deserialization gadget" that allows code execution present on the classpath. Jackson provides a blacklisting approach to protecting against this type of attack, but Spring Security should be proactive against blocking unknown "deserialization gadgets" when Spring Security enables default typing. | ||||
CVE-2016-2173 | 2 Fedoraproject, Vmware | 2 Fedora, Spring Advanced Message Queuing Protocol | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
org.springframework.core.serializer.DefaultDeserializer in Spring AMQP before 1.5.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
CVE-2015-5211 | 2 Debian, Vmware | 2 Debian Linux, Spring Framework | 2025-04-20 | 9.6 Critical |
Under some situations, the Spring Framework 4.2.0 to 4.2.1, 4.0.0 to 4.1.7, 3.2.0 to 3.2.14 and older unsupported versions is vulnerable to a Reflected File Download (RFD) attack. The attack involves a malicious user crafting a URL with a batch script extension that results in the response being downloaded rather than rendered and also includes some input reflected in the response. | ||||
CVE-2014-0097 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
The ActiveDirectoryLdapAuthenticator in Spring Security 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 and 3.1.0 to 3.1.5 does not check the password length. If the directory allows anonymous binds then it may incorrectly authenticate a user who supplies an empty password. | ||||
CVE-2014-0225 | 3 Pivotal Software, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Spring Framework, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
When processing user provided XML documents, the Spring Framework 4.0.0 to 4.0.4, 3.0.0 to 3.2.8, and possibly earlier unsupported versions did not disable by default the resolution of URI references in a DTD declaration. This enabled an XXE attack. | ||||
CVE-2014-3527 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users. | ||||
CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Spring Framework, Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. |