Filtered by vendor Oracle
Subscriptions
Total
14426 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-21984 | 1 Oracle | 1 Vm Virtualbox | 2026-04-18 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-21986 | 1 Oracle | 1 Vm Virtualbox | 2026-04-18 | 7.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. Note: This vulnerability applies to Windows VMs only. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-21989 | 1 Oracle | 1 Vm Virtualbox | 2026-04-18 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2026-21990 | 1 Oracle | 1 Vm Virtualbox | 2026-04-18 | 8.2 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2021-3712 | 8 Debian, Mcafee, Netapp and 5 more | 36 Debian Linux, Epolicy Orchestrator, Clustered Data Ontap and 33 more | 2026-04-16 | 7.4 High |
| ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). | ||||
| CVE-2021-23840 | 8 Debian, Fujitsu, Mcafee and 5 more | 31 Debian Linux, M10-1, M10-1 Firmware and 28 more | 2026-04-16 | 7.5 High |
| Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x). | ||||
| CVE-2020-1968 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Fujitsu and 2 more | 25 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, M10-1 and 22 more | 2026-04-16 | 3.7 Low |
| The Raccoon attack exploits a flaw in the TLS specification which can lead to an attacker being able to compute the pre-master secret in connections which have used a Diffie-Hellman (DH) based ciphersuite. In such a case this would result in the attacker being able to eavesdrop on all encrypted communications sent over that TLS connection. The attack can only be exploited if an implementation re-uses a DH secret across multiple TLS connections. Note that this issue only impacts DH ciphersuites and not ECDH ciphersuites. This issue affects OpenSSL 1.0.2 which is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. OpenSSL 1.1.1 is not vulnerable to this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2w (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2v). | ||||
| CVE-2019-5481 | 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 4 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Curl and 12 more | 2026-04-16 | 9.8 Critical |
| Double-free vulnerability in the FTP-kerberos code in cURL 7.52.0 to 7.65.3. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4549 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server Discussion Forum Portlet | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Oracle Application Server (OracleAS) Discussion Forum Portlet allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) RowKeyValue parameter in the PORTAL schema; and the (2) title and (3) content input fields when creating an forum article. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0272 | 1 Oracle | 2 Oracle10g, Oracle9i | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the XML Database component of Oracle Database server 9.2.0.7 and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB29. NOTE: based on mutual credits by the relevant sources, it is highly likely that this issue is a buffer overflow in the (a) DBMS_XMLSCHEMA and (b) DBMS_XMLSCHEMA_INT packages, as exploitable via long arguments to (1) XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.GENERATESCHEMA or (2) XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.GENERATESCHEMAS. | ||||
| CVE-2004-1339 | 1 Oracle | 2 Database Server, Oracle9i | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the (1) MDSYS.SDO_GEOM_TRIG_INS1 and (2) MDSYS.SDO_LRS_TRIG_INS default triggers in Oracle 9i and 10g allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the new.table_name or new.column_name parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0271 | 1 Oracle | 4 Database Server, Oracle10g, Oracle8i and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Upgrade & Downgrade component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB28. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that the problem is SQL injection in the DBMS_REGISTRY package in certain parameters to the (1) IS_COMPONENT, (2) GET_COMP_OPTION, (3) DISABLE_DDL_TRIGGERS, (4) SCRIPT_EXISTS, (5) COMP_PATH, (6) GATHER_STATS, (7) NOTHING_SCRIPT, and (8) VALIDATE_COMPONENTS functions. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3465 | 2 Jdedwards, Oracle | 2 Oneworld Xe, Enterpriseone | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in JDEdwards HTML Server in Oracle EnterpriseOne 8.94 OneWorld XE up to 8.95_B1, 8.94_Q1, and SP23_K1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# JDE01. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3464 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in PeopleTools in Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise 8.44 up to 8.46 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# PSE04. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3462 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in PeopleTools in Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise 8.44 up to 8.46.02 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# PSE02. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3461 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in PeopleTools in Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise 8.42 up to 8.45.17 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# PSE01. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3460 | 1 Oracle | 2 10g Enterprise Manager Database Control, Enterprise Manager Application Server Control | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Agent in Oracle Enterprise Manager 9.0.4.1 up to 10.1.0.4 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# EM01. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3458 | 1 Oracle | 1 E-business Suite | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite and Applications 11.0 up to 11.5.9 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# APPS19 in Workflow Cartridge. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0274 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0.2 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# REP03. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0273 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Portal component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# AS01. | ||||