Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscriptions
Total
8762 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-7667 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-23 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to create a malicious flow pointing to an attacker-controlled URL that returns a specially crafted Content-Disposition header (e.g., filename="../../../target/path" ), enabling arbitrary file write operations with attacker-controlled content to any path accessible by the Langflow process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7754 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-21 | 7.7 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow 1.9.0 could allow server-side request forgery (SSRF) due to insecure default configuration and incomplete enforcement of the SSRF protection mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15322 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the exposure of session tokens in URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7771 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2026-07-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to a trap when compiling a specially crafted statements containing subqueries could lead to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8635 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-21 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9135 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8056 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to override component parameters at runtime via the API. A critical security flaw exists in the parameter filtering mechanism within the `apply_tweaks()` function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13445 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolute paths pointing to victim storage locations. In append mode, the attacker's workflow reads victim file contents, appends attacker-controlled data, and uploads a copy containing victim data to the attacker's namespace (confidentiality breach). In overwrite mode, the attacker can replace victim file contents with arbitrary data (integrity breach). This breaks the storage ownership boundary between users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15091 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-20 | 9.3 Critical |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8476 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the disk-based caching mechanism. The AsyncDiskCache class uses Python's unsafe pickle.loads() function to deserialize cached objects from disk without validation, integrity verification, or authentication, enabling arbitrary code execution when malicious pickle payloads are processed. Attackers who can influence cached data through file system access, malicious workflow inputs, custom components, or API manipulation can achieve complete system compromise with the privileges of the Langflow server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15069 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-20 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary script code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7872 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files including the JWT signing key and forge authentication tokens for any user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14499 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input in the Python Interpreter component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9103 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper authentication in the /api/v1/login/auto_login endpoint. The endpoint issues long-lived superuser bearer tokens without requiring authentication when the AUTO_LOGIN configuration is enabled (enabled by default), which may allow an unauthenticated network attacker to obtain full administrative access. Additionally, permissive cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) settings may allow tokens to be exposed to unintended origins, increasing the risk of unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8859 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files to unintended locations due to improper input validation in the APIRequest component. A path traversal vulnerability exists when the "Save to File" feature is enabled, where filenames extracted from HTTP response Content-Disposition headers are not sanitized before being joined to the temporary directory path. An attacker controlling an external HTTP server can supply crafted filename values containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../), enabling arbitrary file writes to locations accessible by the Langflow process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15093 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to redirect users to malicious websites due to improper validation of user-supplied URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9202 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-17 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to create unlimited user accounts on any Langflow instance; when NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true (documented deployment option), newly created accounts are immediately active and can authenticate to reach RCE endpoints, bypassing the need for AUTO_LOGIN. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8481 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-17 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint. The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts user-supplied Python code and executes it directly using Python's built-in exec() function without sandboxing, input validation, or privilege restrictions, enabling any authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands with the full privileges of the Langflow server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7364 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-07-17 | 3.1 Low |
| IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, caused by an open redirect vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially crafted request to redirect a victim to arbitrary Web sites. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9762 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2026-07-17 | 7.8 High |
| IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to remote code execution when jdbc url is under user control. | ||||