Total
514 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-52442 | 1 Userplus | 1 Userplus | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Userplus UserPlus allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects UserPlus: from n/a through 2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40433 | 1 Tencent | 1 Wechat | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Tencent wechat v.8.0.37 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the web-view component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37293 | 2 Amazon, Awslabs | 2 Aws Deployment Framework, Aws-deployment-framework | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 High |
| The AWS Deployment Framework (ADF) is a framework to manage and deploy resources across multiple AWS accounts and regions within an AWS Organization. ADF allows for staged, parallel, multi-account, cross-region deployments of applications or resources via the structure defined in AWS Organizations while taking advantage of services such as AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeCommit to alleviate the heavy lifting and management compared to a traditional CI/CD setup. ADF contains a bootstrap process that is responsible to deploy ADF's bootstrap stacks to facilitate multi-account cross-region deployments. The ADF bootstrap process relies on elevated privileges to perform this task. Two versions of the bootstrap process exist; a code-change driven pipeline using AWS CodeBuild and an event-driven state machine using AWS Lambda. If an actor has permissions to change the behavior of the CodeBuild project or the Lambda function, they would be able to escalate their privileges. Prior to version 4.0.0, the bootstrap CodeBuild role provides access to the `sts:AssumeRole` operation without further restrictions. Therefore, it is able to assume into any AWS Account in the AWS Organization with the elevated privileges provided by the cross-account access role. By default, this role is not restricted when it is created by AWS Organizations, providing Administrator level access to the AWS resources in the AWS Account. The patches for this issue are included in `aws-deployment-framework` version 4.0.0. As a temporary mitigation, add a permissions boundary to the roles created by ADF in the management account. The permissions boundary should deny all IAM and STS actions. This permissions boundary should be in place until you upgrade ADF or bootstrap a new account. While the permissions boundary is in place, the account management and bootstrapping of accounts are unable to create, update, or assume into roles. This mitigates the privilege escalation risk, but also disables ADF's ability to create, manage, and bootstrap accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37134 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain root-level access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37132 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service and Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36587 | 1 Dnscrypt | 1 Dnscrypt-proxy | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Insecure permissions in DNSCrypt-proxy v2.0.0alpha9 to v2.1.5 allows non-privileged attackers to escalate privileges to root via overwriting the binary dnscrypt-proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36534 | 1 Hwameistor | 1 Hwameistor | 2024-11-21 | 8.4 High |
| Insecure permissions in hwameistor v0.14.3 allows attackers to access sensitive data and escalate privileges by obtaining the service account's token. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31912 | 1 Ibm | 2 Mq, Mq Appliance | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM MQ 9.3 LTS and 9.3 CD could allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges under certain configurations due to incorrect privilege assignment. IBM X-Force ID: 289894. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27460 | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A privilege escalation exists in the updater for Plantronics Hub 3.25.1 and below. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23794 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2024-11-21 | 5.2 Medium |
| An incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in the inline editing functionality of OTRS can lead to privilege escalation. This flaw allows an agent with read-only permissions to gain full access to a ticket. This issue arises in very rare instances when an admin has previously enabled the setting 'RequiredLock' of 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' in the system configuration.This issue affects OTRS: * 8.0.X * 2023.X * from 2024.X through 2024.4.x | ||||
| CVE-2024-0085 | 6 Canonical, Citrix, Microsoft and 3 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Hypervisor, Azure Stack Hci and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.3 Medium |
| NVIDIA vGPU software for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where unprivileged users could execute privileged operations on the host. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to data tampering, escalation of privileges, and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6815 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 16 R08psfcpu, R08psfcpu Firmware, R08sfcpu and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series Safety CPU R08/16/32/120SFCPU all versions and MELSEC iQ-R Series SIL2 Process CPU R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions allows a remote authenticated attacker who has logged into the product as a non-administrator user to disclose the credentials (user ID and password) of a user with a lower access level than the attacker by sending a specially crafted packet. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5913 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Fortify Scancentral Dast | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in opentext Fortify ScanCentral DAST. The vulnerability could be exploited to gain elevated privileges.This issue affects Fortify ScanCentral DAST versions 21.1, 21.2, 21.2.1, 22.1, 22.1.1, 22.2, 23.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5077 | 2 Hashicorp, Redhat | 3 Vault, Openshift, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 High |
| The Vault and Vault Enterprise ("Vault") Google Cloud secrets engine did not preserve existing Google Cloud IAM Conditions upon creating or updating rolesets. Fixed in Vault 1.13.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47140 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cics Transaction Gateway | 2024-11-21 | 4 Medium |
| IBM CICS Transaction Gateway 9.3 could allow a user to transfer or view files due to improper access controls. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3775 | 2 Hashicorp, Redhat | 2 Vault, Openshift | 2024-11-21 | 4.2 Medium |
| A Vault Enterprise Sentinel Role Governing Policy created by an operator to restrict access to resources in one namespace can be applied to requests outside in another non-descendant namespace, potentially resulting in denial of service. Fixed in Vault Enterprise 1.15.0, 1.14.4, 1.13.8. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3518 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Consul | 2024-11-21 | 7.4 High |
| HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.16.0 when using JWT Auth for service mesh incorrectly allows/denies access regardless of service identities. Fixed in 1.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3300 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Nomad | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 0.11.0 up to 1.5.6 and 1.4.1 HTTP search API can reveal names of available CSI plugins to unauthenticated users or users without the plugin:read policy. Fixed in 1.6.0, 1.5.7, and 1.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3072 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Nomad | 2024-11-21 | 4.1 Medium |
| HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 0.7.0 up to 1.5.6 and 1.4.10 ACL policies using a block without a label generates unexpected results. Fixed in 1.6.0, 1.5.7, and 1.4.11. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39173 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Teamcity | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.05.2 a token with limited permissions could be used to gain full account access | ||||