Total
9692 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-51769 | 1 Hpe | 1 Autopass License Server | 2025-07-25 | 7.5 High |
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in HPE AutoPass License Server (APLS) prior to 9.17. | ||||
CVE-2025-7780 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-25 | 6.5 Medium |
The AI Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.4. The simpleTranscribeAudio endpoint fails to restrict URL schemes before calling get_audio(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to read any file on the web server and exfiltrate it via the plugin’s OpenAI API integration. | ||||
CVE-2020-29010 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-07-24 | 4.9 Medium |
An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability in FortiOS version 6.2.4 and below, version 6.0.10 and belowmay allow remote authenticated actors to read the SSL VPN events log entries of users in other VDOMs by executing "get vpn ssl monitor" from the CLI. The sensitive data includes usernames, user groups, and IP address. | ||||
CVE-2021-24008 | 1 Fortinet | 5 Fortiddos, Fortiddos-cm, Fortimail and 2 more | 2025-07-24 | 5 Medium |
An exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability [CWE-497] in FortiDDoS version 5.4.0, version 5.3.2 and below, version 5.2.0, version 5.1.0, version 5.0.0, version 4.7.0, version 4.6.0, version 4.5.0, version 4.4.2 and below, FortiDDoS-CM version 5.3.0, version 5.2.0, version 5.1.0, version 5.0.0, version 4.7.0, FortiVoice version 6.0.6 and below, FortiRecorder version 6.0.3 and below and FortiMail version 6.4.1 and below, version 6.2.4 and below, version 6.0.9 and below may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to obtain potentially sensitive software-version information by reading a JavaScript file. | ||||
CVE-2025-6082 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-23 | 5.3 Medium |
The Birth Chart Compatibility plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to insufficient protection against directly accessing the plugin's index.php file, which causes an error exposing the full path. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
CVE-2024-20507 | 1 Cisco | 1 Meeting Management | 2025-07-23 | 4.3 Medium |
A vulnerability in the logging subsystem of Cisco Meeting Management could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive information in clear text on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper storage of sensitive information within the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive data that is stored on the affected device. | ||||
CVE-2023-20055 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Center | 2025-07-23 | 8 High |
A vulnerability in the management API of Cisco DNA Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges in the context of the web-based management interface on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to the unintended exposure of sensitive information. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inspecting the responses from the API. Under certain circumstances, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the API with the privileges of a higher-level user account. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need at least valid Observer credentials. | ||||
CVE-2022-20630 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Center | 2025-07-23 | 4.4 Medium |
A vulnerability in the audit log of Cisco DNA Center could allow an authenticated, local attacker to view sensitive information in clear text. This vulnerability is due to the unsecured logging of sensitive information on an affected system. An attacker with administrative privileges could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the audit logs through the CLI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to retrieve sensitive information that includes user credentials. | ||||
CVE-2020-3411 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Center | 2025-07-23 | 7.5 High |
A vulnerability in Cisco DNA Center software could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker access to sensitive information on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of authentication tokens by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker access to sensitive device information, which includes configuration files. | ||||
CVE-2024-52966 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortianalyzer | 2025-07-22 | 2.2 Low |
An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 6.4.0 through 7.6.0 allows attacker to cause information disclosure via filter manipulation. | ||||
CVE-2023-40723 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2025-07-22 | 7.7 High |
An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiSIEM version 6.7.0 through 6.7.4 and 6.6.0 through 6.6.3 and 6.5.0 through 6.5.1 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.2 and 6.3.0 through 6.3.3 and 6.2.0 through 6.2.1 and 6.1.0 through 6.1.2 and 5.4.0 and 5.3.0 through 5.3.3 and 5.2.5 through 5.2.8 and 5.2.1 through 5.2.2 and 5.1.0 through 5.1.3 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via api request. | ||||
CVE-2025-25250 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortisase | 2025-07-22 | 3.9 Low |
An Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability [CWE-200] in FortiOS version 7.6.0, version 7.4.7 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions SSL-VPN web-mode may allow an authenticated user to access full SSL-VPN settings via crafted URL. | ||||
CVE-2025-7394 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-07-22 | N/A |
In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL to make RAND_bytes() behave similar to OpenSSL after a fork() call without calling RAND_poll(). Now the Hash-DRBG used gets reseeded after detecting running in a new process. If making use of RAND_bytes() and calling fork() we recommend updating to the latest version of wolfSSL. Thanks to Per Allansson from Appgate for the report. | ||||
CVE-2025-7919 | 2025-07-22 | 6.5 Medium | ||
WinMatrix3 Web package developed by Simopro Technology has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents. | ||||
CVE-2025-46382 | 2025-07-22 | 5.3 Medium | ||
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor | ||||
CVE-2025-20226 | 1 Splunk | 3 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2025-07-21 | 5.7 Medium |
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.1, 9.3.3, 9.2.5, and 9.1.8 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2408.107, 9.2.2406.111, and 9.1.2308.214, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could run a saved search with a risky command using the permissions of a higher-privileged user to bypass the SPL safeguards for risky commands on the "/services/streams/search" endpoint through its "q" parameter. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The authenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | ||||
CVE-2025-20232 | 1 Splunk | 3 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2025-07-21 | 5.7 Medium |
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.3, 9.2.5, and 9.1.8 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2408.103, 9.2.2406.108, 9.2.2403.113, 9.1.2312.208 and 9.1.2308.212, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could run a saved search with a risky command using the permissions of a higher-privileged user to bypass the SPL safeguards for risky commands on the “/app/search/search“ endpoint through its “s“ parameter. <br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The authenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | ||||
CVE-2024-8055 | 1 Vanna-ai | 1 Vanna | 2025-07-21 | N/A |
Vanna v0.6.3 is vulnerable to SQL injection via Snowflake database in its file staging operations using the `PUT` and `COPY` commands. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote users to read arbitrary local files on the victim server, such as `/etc/passwd`, by exploiting the exposed SQL queries through a Python Flask API. | ||||
CVE-2025-3415 | 1 Grafana | 1 Grafana | 2025-07-21 | 4.3 Medium |
Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. The Grafana Alerting DingDing integration was not properly protected and could be exposed to users with Viewer permission. Fixed in versions 10.4.19+security-01, 11.2.10+security-01, 11.3.7+security-01, 11.4.5+security-01, 11.5.5+security-01, 11.6.2+security-01 and 12.0.1+security-01 | ||||
CVE-2025-53840 | 2025-07-18 | 2.4 Low | ||
Icinga DB Web provides a graphical interface for Icinga monitoring. Starting in version 1.2.0 and prior to version 1.2.2, users with access to Icinga Dependency Views, are allowed to see hosts and services that they weren't meant to on the dependency map. However, the name of an object will not be revealed nor does this grant access to a host's or service's detail view. Please note that this only affects the restrictions `filter/hosts` and `filter/services`. `filter/objects` is not affected by this and restricts objects as it is supposed to. Version 1.2.2 applies these restrictions properly. As a workaround, one may downgrade to version 1.1.3. |