Total
1532 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-33864 | 2 Linqi, Microsoft | 2 Linqi, Windows | 2025-04-28 | 5.9 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in linqi before 1.4.0.1 on Windows. There is SSRF via Document template generation; i.e., via remote images in process creation, file inclusion, and PDF document generation via malicious JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6538 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2025-04-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift Console. A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack can happen if an attacker supplies all or part of a URL to the server to query. The server is considered to be in a privileged network position and can often reach exposed services that aren't readily available to clients due to network filtering. Leveraging such an attack vector, the attacker can have an impact on other services and potentially disclose information or have other nefarious effects on the system. The /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint on the OpenShift Console allows authenticated users to have the console's pod perform arbitrary and fully controlled HTTP(s) requests. The full response to these requests is returned by the endpoint. While the name of this endpoint suggests the requests are only bound to the internet, no such checks are in place. An authenticated user can therefore ask the console to perform arbitrary HTTP requests from outside the cluster to a service inside the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22873 | 1 Tencent | 1 Blueking Cmdb | 2025-04-25 | 8.1 High |
| Tencent Blueking CMDB v3.2.x to v3.9.x was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the event subscription function (/service/subscription.go). This vulnerability allows attackers to access internal requests via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29449 | 1 Lm21 | 1 Twonav | 2025-04-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue in twonav v.2.1.18-20241105 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the link identification function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29460 | 1 Mybb | 1 Mybb | 2025-04-25 | 7.6 High |
| An issue in MyBB 1.8.38 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Add Mycode function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because of the allowed actions of Board administrators and because of SSRF mitigation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41412 | 1 Perfsonar | 1 Perfsonar | 2025-04-24 | 8.6 High |
| An issue in the graphData.cgi component of perfSONAR v4.4.5 and prior allows attackers to access sensitive data and execute Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6294 | 2 Popup Builder, Sygnoos | 2 Popup Builder, Popup Builder | 2025-04-24 | 7.5 High |
| The Popup Builder WordPress plugin before 4.2.6 does not validate a parameter before making a request to it, which could allow users with the administrator role to perform SSRF attack in Multisite WordPress configurations. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35508 | 1 Proxmox | 3 Proxmox Mail Gateway, Pve Http Server, Virtual Environment | 2025-04-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) and Proxmox Mail Gateway (PMG) are vulnerable to SSRF when proxying HTTP requests between pve(pmg)proxy and pve(pmg)daemon. An attacker with an unprivileged account can craft an HTTP request to achieve SSRF and file disclosure of any files on the server. Also, in Proxmox Mail Gateway, privilege escalation to the root@pam account is possible if the backup feature has ever been used, because backup files such as pmg-backup_YYYY_MM_DD_*.tgz have 0644 permissions and contain an authkey value. This is fixed in pve-http-server 4.1-3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29458 | 1 Mybb | 1 Mybb | 2025-04-24 | 7.6 High |
| An issue in MyBB 1.8.38 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Change Avatar function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because of the allowed actions of Board administrators and because of SSRF mitigation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29457 | 1 Mybb | 1 Mybb | 2025-04-24 | 7.6 High |
| An issue in MyBB 1.8.38 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Import a Theme function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because of the allowed actions of Board administrators and because of SSRF mitigation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43880 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Wincollect | 2025-04-24 | 4.4 Medium |
| IBM QRadar WinCollect Agent 10.0 through 10.1.2 could allow a privileged user to cause a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 240151. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3691 | 1 Mirweiye | 1 Seven Bears Library Cms | 2025-04-24 | 2.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in mirweiye Seven Bears Library CMS 2023. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component Add Link Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2021-21009 | 3 Adobe, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Campaign Classic, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2025-04-23 | 8.6 High |
| Adobe Campaign Classic Gold Standard 10 (and earlier), 20.3.1 (and earlier), 20.2.3 (and earlier), 20.1.3 (and earlier), 19.2.3 (and earlier) and 19.1.7 (and earlier) are affected by a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to use the Campaign instance to issue unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28627 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-04-23 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager Cloud Service offering, as well as versions 6.5.8.0 (and below) is affected by a Server-side Request Forgery. An authenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to contact systems blocked by the dispatcher. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56736 | 1 Apache | 1 Hertzbeat | 2025-04-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache HertzBeat. This issue affects Apache HertzBeat (incubating): before 1.7.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.7.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21697 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Jupyter Server Proxy | 2025-04-23 | 6.3 Medium |
| Jupyter Server Proxy is a Jupyter notebook server extension to proxy web services. Versions of Jupyter Server Proxy prior to 3.2.1 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). Any user deploying Jupyter Server or Notebook with jupyter-proxy-server extension enabled is affected. A lack of input validation allows authenticated clients to proxy requests to other hosts, bypassing the `allowed_hosts` check. Because authentication is required, which already grants permissions to make the same requests via kernel or terminal execution, this is considered low to moderate severity. Users may upgrade to version 3.2.1 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, install the patch manually. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23644 | 1 Joinbookwyrm | 1 Bookwyrm | 2025-04-23 | 8.8 High |
| BookWyrm is a decentralized social network for tracking reading habits and reviewing books. The functionality to load a cover via url is vulnerable to a server-side request forgery attack. Any BookWyrm instance running a version prior to v0.3.0 is susceptible to attack from a logged-in user. The problem has been patched and administrators should upgrade to version 0.3.0 As a workaround, BookWyrm instances can close registration and limit members to trusted individuals. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24739 | 1 Alltube Project | 1 Alltube | 2025-04-23 | 7.3 High |
| alltube is an html front end for youtube-dl. On releases prior to 3.0.3, an attacker could craft a special HTML page to trigger either an open redirect attack or a Server-Side Request Forgery attack (depending on how AllTube is configured). The impact is mitigated by the fact the SSRF attack is only possible when the `stream` option is enabled in the configuration. (This option is disabled by default.) 3.0.3 contains a fix for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27501 | 1 Openziti | 1 Openziti | 2025-04-23 | 8.6 High |
| OpenZiti is a free and open source project focused on bringing zero trust to any application. An endpoint on the admin panel can be accessed without any form of authentication. This endpoint accepts a user-supplied URL parameter to connect to an OpenZiti Controller and performs a server-side request, resulting in a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The fixed version has moved the request to the external controller from the server side to the client side, thereby eliminating the identity of the node from being used to gain any additional permissions. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24789 | 1 Orckestra | 1 C1 Cms | 2025-04-23 | 7.6 High |
| C1 CMS is an open-source, .NET based Content Management System (CMS). Versions prior to 6.12 allow an authenticated user to exploit Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by causing the server to make arbitrary GET requests to other servers in the local network or on localhost. The attacker may also truncate arbitrary files to zero size (effectively delete them) leading to denial of service (DoS) or altering application logic. The authenticated user may unknowingly perform the actions by visiting a specially crafted site. Patched in C1 CMS v6.12, no known workarounds exist. | ||||