Total
1618 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-29007 | 1 Apache | 1 Cloudstack | 2025-06-30 | 7.3 High |
| The CloudStack management server and secondary storage VM could be tricked into making requests to restricted or random resources by means of following 301 HTTP redirects presented by external servers when downloading templates or ISOs. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.1.1 or 4.19.0.1, which fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30256 | 1 Openwebui | 1 Open Webui | 2025-06-30 | 6.4 Medium |
| Open WebUI is a user-friendly WebUI for LLMs. Open-webui is vulnerable to authenticated blind server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.1.117. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27347 | 1 Apache | 1 Hugegraph-hubble | 2025-06-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache HugeGraph-Hubble.This issue affects Apache HugeGraph-Hubble: from 1.0.0 before 1.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29190 | 2 Mobsf, Opensecurity | 2 Mobile Security Framework, Mobile Security Framework | 2025-06-30 | 7.5 High |
| Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. In version 3.9.5 Beta and prior, MobSF does not perform any input validation when extracting the hostnames in `android:host`, so requests can also be sent to local hostnames. This can lead to server-side request forgery. An attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization's infrastructure. Commit 5a8eeee73c5f504a6c3abdf2a139a13804efdb77 has a hotfix for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31215 | 1 Opensecurity | 1 Mobile Security Framework | 2025-06-30 | 6.3 Medium |
| Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. A SSRF vulnerability in firebase database check logic. The attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization’s infrastructure. When a malicious app is uploaded to Static analyzer, it is possible to make internal requests. This vulnerability has been patched in version 3.9.8. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29459 | 1 Mybb | 1 Mybb | 2025-06-27 | 7.6 High |
| An issue in MyBB 1.8.38 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Mail function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because of the allowed actions of Board administrators and because of SSRF mitigation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-45250 | 1 Mrdoc | 1 Mrdoc | 2025-06-27 | 5.5 Medium |
| MrDoc v0.95 and before is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the validate_url function of the app_doc/utils.py file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54000 | 2 Mobsf, Opensecurity | 2 Mobile Security Framework, Mobile Security Framework | 2025-06-27 | 7.5 High |
| Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. In versions prior to 3.9.7, the requests.get() request in the _check_url method is specified as allow_redirects=True, which allows a server-side request forgery when a request to .well-known/assetlinks.json" returns a 302 redirect. This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2024-29190 and is fixed in 3.9.7. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28752 | 3 Apache, Netapp, Redhat | 9 Cxf, Oncommand Workflow Automation, Ontap Tools and 6 more | 2025-06-27 | 9.3 Critical |
| A SSRF vulnerability using the Aegis DataBinding in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.4, 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. Users of other data bindings (including the default databinding) are not impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52477 | 2025-06-27 | 8.6 High | ||
| Octo-STS is a GitHub App that acts like a Security Token Service (STS) for the GitHub API. Octo-STS versions before v0.5.3 are vulnerable to unauthenticated SSRF by abusing fields in OpenID Connect tokens. Malicious tokens were shown to trigger internal network requests which could reflect error logs with sensitive information. Upgrade to v0.5.3 to resolve this issue. This version includes patch sets to sanitize input and redact logging. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2828 | 2025-06-26 | N/A | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the RequestsToolkit component of the langchain-community package (specifically, langchain_community.agent_toolkits.openapi.toolkit.RequestsToolkit) in langchain-ai/langchain version 0.0.27. This vulnerability occurs because the toolkit does not enforce restrictions on requests to remote internet addresses, allowing it to also access local addresses. As a result, an attacker could exploit this flaw to perform port scans, access local services, retrieve instance metadata from cloud environments (e.g., Azure, AWS), and interact with servers on the local network. This issue has been fixed in version 0.0.28. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51981 | 2025-06-26 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51980 | 2025-06-26 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing ReplyTo element in a Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) SOAP request. The attacker can not control the data sent in the SSRF connection, nor can the attacker receive any data back. This SSRF is suitable for TCP port scanning of an internal network when the Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) is exposed across a network segment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49877 | 2025-06-26 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss ProfileGrid allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects ProfileGrid : from n/a through 5.9.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1233 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Eus, Jbosseapxp | 2025-06-25 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in` JwtValidator.resolvePublicKey` in JBoss EAP, where the validator checks jku and sends a HTTP request. During this process, no whitelisting or other filtering behavior is performed on the destination URL address, which may result in a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-45475 | 1 Maccms | 1 Maccms | 2025-06-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| maccms10 v2025.1000.4047 is vulnerable to Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) in Friend Link Management. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52588 | 1 Strapi | 1 Strapi | 2025-06-24 | 4.9 Medium |
| Strapi is an open-source content management system. Prior to version 4.25.2, inputting a local domain into the Webhooks URL field leads to the application fetching itself, resulting in a server side request forgery (SSRF). This issue has been patched in version 4.25.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47208 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2025-06-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.17. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.17, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6517 | 2025-06-24 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Dromara MaxKey up to 4.1.7 and classified as critical. This issue affects the function Add of the file maxkey-webs\maxkey-web-mgt\src\main\java\org\dromara\maxkey\web\apps\contorller\SAML20DetailsController.java of the component Meta URL Handler. The manipulation of the argument post leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34021 | 2025-06-23 | N/A | ||
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR camera models, including iZero, Targa 512, Targa 504, Targa Semplice, Targa 704 TKM, Targa 805, Targa 710 INOX, Targa 750, and Targa 704 ILB. The application fails to validate user-supplied input in JSON POST parameters such as ipnotify_address and url, which are used by internal mechanisms to perform image fetch and DNS lookups. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to induce the system to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing firewall policies or conducting internal service enumeration. | ||||