Total
2499 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-5136 | 1 Project Team | 1 Tmall Demo | 2025-06-19 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Tmall Demo up to 20250505. This affects an unknown part of the file /tmall/order/pay/ of the component Payment Identifier Handler. The manipulation leads to insufficiently random values. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33037 | 1 Qualcomm | 166 Ar8035, Ar8035 Firmware, Fastconnect 6200 and 163 more | 2025-06-17 | 7.1 High |
| Cryptographic issue in Automotive while unwrapping the key secs2d and verifying with RPMB data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4894 | 1 Calmkart | 1 Django-sso-server | 2025-06-05 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in calmkart Django-sso-server up to 057247929a94ffc358788a37ab99e391379a4d15. This vulnerability affects the function gen_rsa_keys of the file common/crypto.py. The manipulation leads to inadequate encryption strength. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1624 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 8 Bc-java, Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-c\#-cryptography-api, Jboss Amq and 5 more | 2025-05-12 | N/A |
| The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000352 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 4 Bc-java, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-12 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the ECIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000339 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2025-05-12 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the primary engine class used for AES was AESFastEngine. Due to the highly table driven approach used in the algorithm it turns out that if the data channel on the CPU can be monitored the lookup table accesses are sufficient to leak information on the AES key being used. There was also a leak in AESEngine although it was substantially less. AESEngine has been modified to remove any signs of leakage (testing carried out on Intel X86-64) and is now the primary AES class for the BC JCE provider from 1.56. Use of AESFastEngine is now only recommended where otherwise deemed appropriate. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000344 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 4 Bc-java, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-12 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000343 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2025-05-12 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values. If the JCA key pair generator is not explicitly initialised with DSA parameters, 1.55 and earlier generates a private value assuming a 1024 bit key size. In earlier releases this can be dealt with by explicitly passing parameters to the key pair generator. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20690 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 3 more | 2025-05-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Windows Nearby Sharing Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-26228 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-05-03 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Cryptographic Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-32222 | 2 Nodejs, Siemens | 2 Node.js, Sinec Ins | 2025-04-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| A cryptographic vulnerability exists on Node.js on linux in versions of 18.x prior to 18.40.0 which allowed a default path for openssl.cnf that might be accessible under some circumstances to a non-admin user instead of /etc/ssl as was the case in versions prior to the upgrade to OpenSSL 3. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23919 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Node.js, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-30 | 7.5 High |
| A cryptographic vulnerability exists in Node.js <19.2.0, <18.14.1, <16.19.1, <14.21.3 that in some cases did does not clear the OpenSSL error stack after operations that may set it. This may lead to false positive errors during subsequent cryptographic operations that happen to be on the same thread. This in turn could be used to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6766 | 1 Cisco | 1 Firesight System Software | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Decryption and Inspection feature of Cisco Firepower System Software 5.4.0, 5.4.1, 6.0.0, 6.1.0, 6.2.0, 6.2.1, and 6.2.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the SSL policy for decrypting and inspecting traffic on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to unexpected interaction with Known Key and Decrypt and Resign configuration settings of SSL policies when the affected software receives unexpected SSL packet headers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SSL packet through an affected device in a valid SSL session. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the SSL decryption and inspection policy for the affected system, which could allow traffic to flow through the system without being inspected. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCve12652. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1919 | 1 Samsung | 1 Knox | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Samsung KNOX 1.0 uses a weak eCryptFS Key generation algorithm, which makes it easier for local users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging knowledge of the TIMA key and a brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10136 | 1 Adups | 1 Adups Fota | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered on BLU R1 HD devices with Shanghai Adups software. The content provider named com.adups.fota.sysoper.provider.InfoProvider in the app with a package name of com.adups.fota.sysoper allows any app on the device to read, write, and delete files as the system user. In the com.adups.fota.sysoper app's AndroidManifest.xml file, it sets the android:sharedUserId attribute to a value of android.uid.system which makes it execute as the system user, which is a very privileged user on the device. This allows a third-party app to read, write, and delete files owned by the system user. The third-party app can modify the /data/system/users/0/settings_secure.xml file to add an app as a notification listener to be able to receive the text of notifications as they are received on the device. This also allows the /data/system/users/0/accounts.db to be read which contains authentication tokens for various accounts on the device. The third-party app can obtain privileged information and also modify files to obtain more privileges on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10137 | 1 Adups | 1 Adups Fota | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered on BLU R1 HD devices with Shanghai Adups software. The content provider named com.adups.fota.sysoper.provider.InfoProvider in the app with a package name of com.adups.fota.sysoper allows any app on the device to read, write, and delete files as the system user. In the com.adups.fota.sysoper app's AndroidManifest.xml file, it sets the android:sharedUserId attribute to a value of android.uid.system which makes it execute as the system user, which is a very privileged user on the device. This allows a third-party app to read, write, and delete the user's sent and received text messages and call log. This allows a third-party app to obtain PII from the user without permission to do so. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10138 | 1 Adups | 1 Adups Fota | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered on BLU Advance 5.0 and BLU R1 HD devices with Shanghai Adups software. The com.adups.fota.sysoper app is installed as a system app and cannot be disabled by the user. In the com.adups.fota.sysoper app's AndroidManifest.xml file, it sets the android:sharedUserId attribute to a value of android.uid.system which makes it execute as the system user, which is a very privileged user on the device. The app has an exported broadcast receiver named com.adups.fota.sysoper.WriteCommandReceiver which any app on the device can interact with. Therefore, any app can send a command embedded in an intent which will be executed by the WriteCommandReceiver component which is executing as the system user. The third-party app, utilizing the WriteCommandReceiver, can perform the following actions: call a phone number, factory reset the device, take pictures of the screen, record the screen in a video, install applications, inject events, obtain the Android log, and others. In addition, the com.adups.fota.sysoper.TaskService component will make a request to a URL of http://rebootv5.adsunflower.com/ps/fetch.do where the commands in the String array with a key of sf in the JSON Object sent back by the server will be executed as the system user. Since the connection is made via HTTP, it is vulnerable to a MITM attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7812 | 1 Mufg | 1 Mitsubishi Ufj | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. App for Android ver5.3.1, ver5.2.2 and earlier allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to downgrade the communication between the app and the server from TLS v1.2 to SSL v3.0, which may result in the attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6329 | 1 Openvpn | 1 Openvpn | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| OpenVPN, when using a 64-bit block cipher, makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTP-over-OpenVPN session using Blowfish in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0736 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.23, mod_session_crypto was encrypting its data/cookie using the configured ciphers with possibly either CBC or ECB modes of operation (AES256-CBC by default), hence no selectable or builtin authenticated encryption. This made it vulnerable to padding oracle attacks, particularly with CBC. | ||||