Filtered by vendor Python
Subscriptions
Total
294 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2007-2052 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Off-by-one error in the PyLocale_strxfrm function in Modules/_localemodule.c for Python 2.4 and 2.5 causes an incorrect buffer size to be used for the strxfrm function, which allows context-dependent attackers to read portions of memory via unknown manipulations that trigger a buffer over-read due to missing null termination. | ||||
| CVE-2009-3720 | 5 A M Kuchling, Apache, Libexpat Project and 2 more | 7 Pyxml, Http Server, Libexpat and 4 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| The updatePosition function in lib/xmltok_impl.c in libexpat in Expat 2.0.1, as used in Python, PyXML, w3c-libwww, and other software, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via an XML document with crafted UTF-8 sequences that trigger a buffer over-read, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2625. | ||||
| CVE-2008-5031 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Python, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in Python 2.2.3 through 2.5.1, and 2.6, allow context-dependent attackers to have an unknown impact via a large integer value in the tabsize argument to the expandtabs method, as implemented by (1) the string_expandtabs function in Objects/stringobject.c and (2) the unicode_expandtabs function in Objects/unicodeobject.c. NOTE: this vulnerability reportedly exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2008-2315. | ||||
| CVE-2008-3144 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Python, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in the PyOS_vsnprintf function in Python/mysnprintf.c in Python 2.5.2 and earlier allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or have unspecified other impact via crafted input to string formatting operations. NOTE: the handling of certain integer values is also affected by related integer underflows and an off-by-one error. | ||||
| CVE-2007-4965 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in the imageop module in Python 2.5.1 and earlier allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly obtain sensitive information (memory contents) via crafted arguments to (1) the tovideo method, and unspecified other vectors related to (2) imageop.c, (3) rbgimgmodule.c, and other files, which trigger heap-based buffer overflows. | ||||
| CVE-2008-5983 | 4 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Python and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Python and 1 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Untrusted search path vulnerability in the PySys_SetArgv API function in Python 2.6 and earlier, and possibly later versions, prepends an empty string to sys.path when the argv[0] argument does not contain a path separator, which might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse Python file in the current working directory. | ||||
| CVE-2008-2316 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c in the hashlib module in Python 2.5.2 and earlier might allow context-dependent attackers to defeat cryptographic digests, related to "partial hashlib hashing of data exceeding 4GB." | ||||
| CVE-2008-3142 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Python and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Python and 1 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Python 2.5.2 and earlier on 32bit platforms allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or have unspecified other impact via a long string that leads to incorrect memory allocation during Unicode string processing, related to the unicode_resize function and the PyMem_RESIZE macro. | ||||
| CVE-2008-4864 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Python, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in imageop.c in the imageop module in Python 1.5.2 through 2.5.1 allow context-dependent attackers to break out of the Python VM and execute arbitrary code via large integer values in certain arguments to the crop function, leading to a buffer overflow, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-4965 and CVE-2008-1679. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40192 | 2 Python, Python-pillow | 2 Pillow, Pillow | 2026-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| Pillow is a Python imaging library. Versions 10.3.0 through 12.1.1 did not limit the amount of GZIP-compressed data read when decoding a FITS image, making them vulnerable to decompression bomb attacks. A specially crafted FITS file could cause unbounded memory consumption, leading to denial of service (OOM crash or severe performance degradation). If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should only open specific image formats, excluding FITS, as a workaround. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4517 | 2 Python, Redhat | 7 Cpython, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2026-04-22 | 9.4 Critical |
| Allows arbitrary filesystem writes outside the extraction directory during extraction with filter="data". You are affected by this vulnerability if using the tarfile module to extract untrusted tar archives using TarFile.extractall() or TarFile.extract() using the filter= parameter with a value of "data" or "tar". See the tarfile extraction filters documentation https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfile.html#tarfile-extraction-filter for more information. Note that for Python 3.14 or later the default value of filter= changed from "no filtering" to `"data", so if you are relying on this new default behavior then your usage is also affected. Note that none of these vulnerabilities significantly affect the installation of source distributions which are tar archives as source distributions already allow arbitrary code execution during the build process. However when evaluating source distributions it's important to avoid installing source distributions with suspicious links. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4435 | 2 Python, Redhat | 7 Cpython, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2026-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| When using a TarFile.errorlevel = 0 and extracting with a filter the documented behavior is that any filtered members would be skipped and not extracted. However the actual behavior of TarFile.errorlevel = 0 in affected versions is that the member would still be extracted and not skipped. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8291 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-04-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be abused to create ZIP archives that are handled differently by the 'zipfile' module compared to other ZIP implementations. Remediation maintains this behavior, but checks that the offset specified in the ZIP64 EOCD Locator record matches the expected value. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4516 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-04-22 | 5.1 Medium |
| There is an issue in CPython when using `bytes.decode("unicode_escape", error="ignore|replace")`. If you are not using the "unicode_escape" encoding or an error handler your usage is not affected. To work-around this issue you may stop using the error= handler and instead wrap the bytes.decode() call in a try-except catching the DecodeError. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3219 | 1 Python | 1 Pip | 2026-04-22 | 5.0 Medium |
| pip handles concatenated tar and ZIP files as ZIP files regardless of filename or whether a file is both a tar and ZIP file. This behavior could result in confusing installation behavior, such as installing "incorrect" files according to the filename of the archive. New behavior only proceeds with installation if the file identifies uniquely as a ZIP or tar archive, not as both. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6069 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-04-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| The html.parser.HTMLParser class had worse-case quadratic complexity when processing certain crafted malformed inputs potentially leading to amplified denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8194 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| There is a defect in the CPython “tarfile” module affecting the “TarFile” extraction and entry enumeration APIs. The tar implementation would process tar archives with negative offsets without error, resulting in an infinite loop and deadlock during the parsing of maliciously crafted tar archives. This vulnerability can be mitigated by including the following patch after importing the “tarfile” module: https://gist.github.com/sethmlarson/1716ac5b82b73dbcbf23ad2eff8b33e1 | ||||
| CVE-2026-3298 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-04-21 | N/A |
| The method "sock_recvfrom_into()" of "asyncio.ProacterEventLoop" (Windows only) was missing a boundary check for the data buffer when using nbytes parameter. This allowed for an out-of-bounds buffer write if data was larger than the buffer size. Non-Windows platforms are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1502 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-04-21 | 4.5 Medium |
| CR/LF bytes were not rejected by HTTP client proxy tunnel headers or host. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1795 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-04-21 | 3.1 Low |
| During an address list folding when a separating comma ends up on a folded line and that line is to be unicode-encoded then the separator itself is also unicode-encoded. Expected behavior is that the separating comma remains a plan comma. This can result in the address header being misinterpreted by some mail servers. | ||||