Filtered by vendor Cisco Subscriptions
Filtered by product Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software Subscriptions

Search

Switch to Advanced Search (Beta)
Total 24 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2003-0258 1 Cisco 7 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client, Vpn 3005 Concentrator Software and 4 more 2025-04-03 N/A
Cisco VPN 3000 series concentrators and Cisco VPN 3002 Hardware Client 3.5.x through 4.0.REL, when enabling IPSec over TCP for a port on the concentrator, allow remote attackers to reach the private network without authentication.
CVE-2005-4499 1 Cisco 21 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Pix Asa Ids, Pix Firewall and 18 more 2025-04-03 N/A
The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS.
CVE-2006-3073 1 Cisco 2 Asa 5500, Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software 2025-04-03 N/A
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the WebVPN feature in the Cisco VPN 3000 Series Concentrators and Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA), when in WebVPN clientless mode, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the domain parameter in (1) dnserror.html and (2) connecterror.html, aka bugid CSCsd81095 (VPN3k) and CSCse48193 (ASA). NOTE: the vendor states that "WebVPN full-network-access mode" is not affected, despite the claims by the original researcher.
CVE-2006-3906 1 Cisco 21 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Ios, Pix Asa Ids and 18 more 2025-04-03 N/A
Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected.