Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Rhel Aus
Subscriptions
Total
1231 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13601 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 41 Glib, Ceph Storage, Codeready Linux Builder and 38 more | 2026-06-02 | 7.7 High |
| A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26597 | 3 Redhat, Tigervnc, X.org | 9 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 6 more | 2026-06-02 | 7.8 High |
| A buffer overflow flaw was found in X.Org and Xwayland. If XkbChangeTypesOfKey() is called with a 0 group, it will resize the key symbols table to 0 but leave the key actions unchanged. If the same function is later called with a non-zero value of groups, this will cause a buffer overflow because the key actions are of the wrong size. | ||||
| CVE-2018-3646 | 2 Intel, Redhat | 16 Core I3, Core I5, Core I7 and 13 more | 2026-05-29 | 5.6 Medium |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and address translations may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache to an attacker with local user access with guest OS privilege via a terminal page fault and a side-channel analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2018-3639 | 12 Arm, Canonical, Debian and 9 more | 330 Cortex-a, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 327 more | 2026-05-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. | ||||
| CVE-2018-3620 | 2 Intel, Redhat | 16 Core I3, Core I5, Core I7 and 13 more | 2026-05-29 | 5.6 Medium |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and address translations may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache to an attacker with local user access via a terminal page fault and a side-channel analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12130 | 3 Fedoraproject, Intel, Redhat | 13 Fedora, Microarchitectural Fill Buffer Data Sampling, Microarchitectural Fill Buffer Data Sampling Firmware and 10 more | 2026-05-29 | 5.9 Medium |
| Microarchitectural Fill Buffer Data Sampling (MFBDS): Fill buffers on some microprocessors utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access. A list of impacted products can be found here: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/corporate-information/SA00233-microcode-update-guidance_05132019.pdf | ||||
| CVE-2018-12127 | 3 Fedoraproject, Intel, Redhat | 13 Fedora, Microarchitectural Load Port Data Sampling, Microarchitectural Load Port Data Sampling Firmware and 10 more | 2026-05-29 | 5.6 Medium |
| Microarchitectural Load Port Data Sampling (MLPDS): Load ports on some microprocessors utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access. A list of impacted products can be found here: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/corporate-information/SA00233-microcode-update-guidance_05132019.pdf | ||||
| CVE-2018-12126 | 3 Fedoraproject, Intel, Redhat | 13 Fedora, Microarchitectural Store Buffer Data Sampling, Microarchitectural Store Buffer Data Sampling Firmware and 10 more | 2026-05-29 | 5.6 Medium |
| Microarchitectural Store Buffer Data Sampling (MSBDS): Store buffers on some microprocessors utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access. A list of impacted products can be found here: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/corporate-information/SA00233-microcode-update-guidance_05132019.pdf | ||||
| CVE-2021-4104 | 4 Apache, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 1 more | 59 Log4j, Fedora, Advanced Supply Chain Planning and 56 more | 2026-05-28 | 7.5 High |
| JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21968 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 17 Debian Linux, 7-mode Transition Tool, Brocade San Navigator and 14 more | 2026-05-28 | 3.7 Low |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Libraries). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u361, 8u361-perf, 11.0.18, 17.0.6, 20; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.9, 21.3.5 and 22.3.1. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability can also be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.7 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2017-5753 | 14 Arm, Canonical, Debian and 11 more | 396 Cortex-a12, Cortex-a12 Firmware, Cortex-a15 and 393 more | 2026-05-28 | 5.6 Medium |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5754 | 3 Arm, Intel, Redhat | 218 Cortex-a, Atom C, Atom E and 215 more | 2026-05-28 | 5.6 Medium |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis of the data cache. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21830 | 3 Azul, Oracle, Redhat | 12 Zulu, Communications Unified Assurance, Graalvm and 9 more | 2026-05-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Serialization). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u351, 8u351-perf; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.8 and 21.3.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2023-21835 | 3 Azul, Oracle, Redhat | 10 Zulu, Graalvm, Jdk and 7 more | 2026-05-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: JSSE). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 11.0.17, 17.0.5, 19.0.1; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.8, 21.3.4 and 22.3.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via DTLS to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2026-4802 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Rhel Aus and 3 more | 2026-05-28 | 8 High |
| A flaw was found in Cockpit. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to achieve arbitrary command execution on the host by exploiting unsanitized user-controlled parameters within crafted links in the system logs user interface (UI). An attacker can inject shell metacharacters and command substitutions into these parameters, leading to the execution of arbitrary shell commands on the affected system. This could result in a complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54508 | 2 Apple, Redhat | 13 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 10 more | 2026-05-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| The issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in Safari 18.2, iOS 18.2 and iPadOS 18.2, iPadOS 17.7.6, macOS Sequoia 15.2, tvOS 18.2, visionOS 2.2, watchOS 11.2. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to an unexpected process crash. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3775 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 6 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 3 more | 2026-05-27 | 7.1 High |
| When rendering certain unicode sequences, grub2's font code doesn't proper validate if the informed glyph's width and height is constrained within bitmap size. As consequence an attacker can craft an input which will lead to a out-of-bounds write into grub2's heap, leading to memory corruption and availability issues. Although complex, arbitrary code execution could not be discarded. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35091 | 2 Corosync, Redhat | 10 Corosync, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 7 more | 2026-05-26 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Corosync. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit a wrong return value vulnerability in the Corosync membership commit token sanity check by sending a specially crafted User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packet. This can lead to an out-of-bounds read, causing a denial of service (DoS) and potentially disclosing limited memory contents | ||||
| CVE-2026-35092 | 2 Corosync, Redhat | 10 Corosync, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 7 more | 2026-05-26 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Corosync. An integer overflow vulnerability in Corosync's join message sanity validation allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send crafted User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packets. This can cause the service to crash, leading to a denial of service. This vulnerability specifically affects Corosync deployments configured to use totemudp/totemudpu mode. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4887 | 3 Gimp, Gnome, Redhat | 7 Gimp, Gimp, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2026-05-26 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GIMP. This issue is a heap buffer over-read in GIMP PCX file loader due to an off-by-one error. A remote attacker could exploit this by convincing a user to open a specially crafted PCX image. Successful exploitation could lead to out-of-bounds memory disclosure and a possible application crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||