Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Red Hat Single Sign On
Subscriptions
Total
256 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-12799 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-07-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Jastow. Jastow is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack. If using a set of combined configuration to allow unescaped characters in URL with embedded Undertow and Jastow, a server might be vulnerable to improper input handling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3260 | 1 Redhat | 11 Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot, Data Grid and 8 more | 2026-07-07 | 5.9 Medium |
| The Undertow web server enforces a default maximum HTTP request entity size limit. Any request (including GET or HEAD) containing a body that exceeds this configurable limit is safely dropped by the server, preventing single-request Resource Exhaustion (Out of Memory) Denial of Service attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14781 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-07-06 | 4.8 Medium |
| A flaw exists in the org.keycloak.broker.oidc package where the OIDC broker incorrectly synchronizes the email_verified claim. When an OIDC identity provider is configured with trustEmail=true and the userinfo endpoint is enabled, Keycloak retrieves the email address from the userinfo response but retrieves the email_verified status exclusively from the id_token. The root cause is a lack of validation ensuring that the email_verified claim in the id_token actually refers to the email address returned by the userinfo endpoint. If these two sources return different email addresses, the id_token's email_verified=true claim is blindly applied to the userinfo email. Exploitation Conditions: The OIDC identity provider must have trustEmail set to true (non-default). The userinfo endpoint must be enabled (default). The attacker must control or have compromised the upstream OIDC provider. Concrete Impact: Mark arbitrary email addresses as verified in the Keycloak database. Bypass email-based security controls or verification workflows. Potential account takeover if the application relies solely on the email_verified flag from the IdP to link accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11577 | 1 Redhat | 5 Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2026-07-03 | 7.2 High |
| The reported behavior does not constitute a privilege escalation. Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess the manage-realm administrative role within the realm-management client. By design, the manage-realm role is intended to be equivalent in administrative authority to realm-admin. A user with manage-realm already has full administrative control over the realm. Therefore, importing users with realm-admin role mappings through POST /admin/realms/{realm}/partialImport does not grant any additional privileges beyond those already held by the administrator and does not represent a security vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23368 | 1 Redhat | 11 Build Keycloak, Data Grid, Integration and 8 more | 2026-06-30 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Wildfly Elytron integration. The component does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it more susceptible to brute force attacks via CLI. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11831 | 1 Redhat | 34 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform and 31 more | 2026-06-29 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in npm-serialize-javascript. The vulnerability occurs because the serialize-javascript module does not properly sanitize certain inputs, such as regex or other JavaScript object types, allowing an attacker to inject malicious code. This code could be executed when deserialized by a web browser, causing Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. This issue is critical in environments where serialized data is sent to web clients, potentially compromising the security of the website or web application using this package. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11800 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 4 more | 2026-06-26 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. This JWT algorithm confusion vulnerability in the JWT Authorization Grant flow allows an attacker with valid client credentials to bypass signature verification. By forging an assertion, the attacker can create unauthorized access tokens. This enables the attacker to impersonate any federated user linked to the affected Identity Provider, leading to unauthorized access and potential privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6484 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2026-06-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| A log injection flaw was found in Keycloak. A text string may be injected through the authentication form when using the WebAuthn authentication mode. This issue may have a minor impact to the logs integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4874 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-26 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated attacker can perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by manipulating the `client_session_host` parameter during refresh token requests. This occurs when a Keycloak client is configured to use the `backchannel.logout.url` with the `application.session.host` placeholder. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to make HTTP requests from the Keycloak server’s network context, potentially probing internal networks or internal APIs, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4029 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-26 | 4.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Wildfly’s management interface. Due to the lack of limitation of sockets for the management interface, it may be possible to cause a denial of service hitting the nofile limit as there is no possibility to configure or set a maximum number of connections. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23913 | 3 Apache, Netapp, Redhat | 9 Artemis, Active Iq Unified Manager, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 6 more | 2026-06-15 | 7.5 High |
| In Apache ActiveMQ Artemis prior to 2.20.0 or 2.19.1, an attacker could partially disrupt availability (DoS) through uncontrolled resource consumption of memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28369 | 1 Redhat | 17 Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot and 14 more | 2026-06-10 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. When Undertow receives an HTTP request where the first header line starts with one or more spaces, it incorrectly processes the request by stripping these leading spaces. This behavior, which violates HTTP standards, can be exploited by a remote attacker to perform request smuggling. Request smuggling allows an attacker to bypass security mechanisms, access restricted information, or manipulate web caches, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28368 | 1 Redhat | 17 Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot and 14 more | 2026-06-10 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to construct specially crafted requests where header names are parsed differently by Undertow compared to upstream proxies. This discrepancy in header interpretation can be exploited to launch request smuggling attacks, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing unauthorized resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28367 | 1 Redhat | 17 Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot and 14 more | 2026-06-10 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending `\r\r\r` as a header block terminator. This can be used for request smuggling with certain proxy servers, such as older versions of Apache Traffic Server and Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer, potentially leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of web requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4366 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-09 | 5.8 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in Keycloak, an identity and access management solution, where it improperly follows HTTP redirects when processing certain client configuration requests. This behavior allows an attacker to trick the server into making unintended requests to internal or restricted resources. As a result, sensitive internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints could be accessed. This issue may lead to information disclosure and enable attackers to map internal network infrastructure. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45105 | 6 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 131 Log4j, Debian Linux, Cloud Manager and 128 more | 2026-05-29 | 5.9 Medium |
| Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4104 | 4 Apache, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 1 more | 59 Log4j, Fedora, Advanced Supply Chain Planning and 56 more | 2026-05-28 | 7.5 High |
| JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23302 | 6 Apache, Broadcom, Netapp and 3 more | 44 Log4j, Brocade Sannav, Snapmanager and 41 more | 2026-05-22 | 8.8 High |
| JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23305 | 6 Apache, Broadcom, Netapp and 3 more | 46 Log4j, Brocade Sannav, Snapmanager and 43 more | 2026-05-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23307 | 4 Apache, Oracle, Qos and 1 more | 44 Chainsaw, Log4j, Advanced Supply Chain Planning and 41 more | 2026-05-22 | 8.8 High |
| CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. | ||||