Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Jboss Amq
Subscriptions
Total
102 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3156 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The OAuth2 Hawk and JOSE MAC Validation code in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.13 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.10 is not using a constant time MAC signature comparison algorithm which may be exploited by sophisticated timing attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12634 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The camel-castor component in Apache Camel 2.x before 2.19.4 and 2.20.x before 2.20.1 is vulnerable to Java object de-serialisation vulnerability. De-serializing untrusted data can lead to security flaws. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5653 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5656 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF's STSClient before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 uses a flawed way of caching tokens that are associated with delegation tokens, which means that an attacker could craft a token which would return an identifer corresponding to a cached token for another user. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5181 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss A-mq, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The JBoss console in A-MQ allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5183 | 1 Redhat | 6 Amq, Amq Broker, Jboss A-mq and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| Console: HTTPOnly and Secure attributes not set on cookies in Red Hat AMQ. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3600 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Activemq, Fuse Esb Enterprise, Fuse Management Console and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.10.1 allows remote consumers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving an XPath based selector when dequeuing XML messages. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6812 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The HTTP transport module in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.12 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.9 uses FormattedServiceListWriter to provide an HTML page which lists the names and absolute URL addresses of the available service endpoints. The module calculates the base URL using the current HttpServletRequest. The calculated base URL is used by FormattedServiceListWriter to build the service endpoint absolute URLs. If the unexpected matrix parameters have been injected into the request URL then these matrix parameters will find their way back to the client in the services list page which represents an XSS risk to the client. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5643 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8739 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The JAX-RS module in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.12 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.9 provides a number of Atom JAX-RS MessageBodyReaders. These readers use Apache Abdera Parser which expands XML entities by default which represents a major XXE risk. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3159 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Camel's camel-snakeyaml component is vulnerable to Java object de-serialization vulnerability. De-serializing untrusted data can lead to security flaws. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0225 | 3 Pivotal Software, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Spring Framework, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When processing user provided XML documents, the Spring Framework 4.0.0 to 4.0.4, 3.0.0 to 3.2.8, and possibly earlier unsupported versions did not disable by default the resolution of URI references in a DTD declaration. This enabled an XXE attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5725 | 3 Jcraft, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Jsch, Windows, Jboss Amq and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in JCraft JSch before 0.1.54 on Windows, when the mode is ChannelSftp.OVERWRITE, allows remote SFTP servers to write to arbitrary files via a ..\ (dot dot backslash) in a response to a recursive GET command. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5929 | 2 Qos, Redhat | 7 Logback, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| QOS.ch Logback before 1.2.0 has a serialization vulnerability affecting the SocketServer and ServerSocketReceiver components. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9879 | 3 Ibm, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Websphere Application Server, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security before 3.2.10, 4.1.x before 4.1.4, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1. Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed. Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath(), and getPathInfo(). Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified. Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected. Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5662 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Batik, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1796 | 2 Redhat, Shibboleth | 4 Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse, Identity Provider and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The PKIX trust engines in Shibboleth Identity Provider before 2.4.4 and OpenSAML Java (OpenSAML-J) before 2.6.5 trust candidate X.509 credentials when no trusted names are available for the entityID, which allows remote attackers to impersonate an entity via a certificate issued by a shibmd:KeyAuthority trust anchor. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3623 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Cxf, Wss4j, Jboss Amq and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does not properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0263 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the XML converter setup in converter/jaxp/XmlConverter.java in Apache Camel before 2.13.4 and 2.14.x before 2.14.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an external entity in an SAXSource. | ||||
| CVE-2014-8175 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse before 6.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions and access the HawtIO console by leveraging an account defined in the users.properties file. | ||||