Filtered by vendor Gnu
Subscriptions
Total
1097 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-5080 | 1 Gnu | 1 Groff | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The (1) contrib/eqn2graph/eqn2graph.sh, (2) contrib/grap2graph/grap2graph.sh, and (3) contrib/pic2graph/pic2graph.sh scripts in GNU troff (aka groff) 1.21 and earlier do not properly handle certain failed attempts to create temporary directories, which might allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a file in a temporary directory, a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-1296. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5079 | 1 Gnu | 1 Groff | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The (1) gendef.sh, (2) doc/fixinfo.sh, and (3) contrib/gdiffmk/tests/runtests.in scripts in GNU troff (aka groff) 1.21 and earlier allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a gro#####.tmp or /tmp/##### temporary file. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5064 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Glibc, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| ldd in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse executable file linked with a modified loader that omits certain LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS checks. NOTE: the GNU C Library vendor states "This is just nonsense. There are a gazillion other ways to introduce code if people are downloading arbitrary binaries and install them in appropriate directories or set LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5044 | 2 Apple, Gnu | 2 Mac Os X, Groff | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| contrib/pdfmark/pdfroff.sh in GNU troff (aka groff) before 1.21 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a pdf#####.tmp temporary file. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5029 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Glibc, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the __tzfile_read function in glibc before 2.15 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted timezone (TZ) file, as demonstrated using vsftpd. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2624 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gzip | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The huft_build function in inflate.c in gzip before 1.3.13 creates a hufts (aka huffman) table that is too small, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash or infinite loop) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted archive. NOTE: this issue is caused by a CVE-2006-4334 regression. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0864 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Glibc, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in glibc 2.14 and other versions allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE protection mechanism, conduct format string attacks, and write to arbitrary memory via a large number of arguments. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5667 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Grep, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in GNU Grep before 2.11 might allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving a long input line that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4355 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Gdb, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| GNU Project Debugger (GDB) before 7.5, when .debug_gdb_scripts is defined, automatically loads certain files from the current working directory, which allows local users to gain privileges via crafted files such as Python scripts. | ||||
| CVE-2012-3405 | 3 Canonical, Gnu, Redhat | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Glibc, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.14 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via a format string with a large number of format specifiers that triggers "desynchronization within the buffer size handling," a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3404. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0825 | 1 Gnu | 1 Emacs | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| lib-src/movemail.c in movemail in emacs 22 and 23 allows local users to read, modify, or delete arbitrary mailbox files via a symlink attack, related to improper file-permission checks. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5081 | 1 Gnu | 1 Groff | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The (1) config.guess, (2) contrib/groffer/perl/groffer.pl, and (3) contrib/groffer/perl/roff2.pl scripts in GNU troff (aka groff) 1.21 and earlier use an insufficient number of X characters in the template argument to the tempfile function, which makes it easier for local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-0969. | ||||
| CVE-2010-2056 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gv | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| GNU gv before 3.7.0 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary file. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4881 | 1 Gnu | 1 Glibc | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the __vstrfmon_l function in stdlib/strfmon_l.c in the strfmon implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.10.1 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted format string, as demonstrated by the %99999999999999999999n string, a related issue to CVE-2008-1391. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5078 | 2 Apple, Gnu | 2 Mac Os X, Groff | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| contrib/pdfmark/pdfroff.sh in GNU troff (aka groff) before 1.21 launches the Ghostscript program without the -dSAFER option, which allows remote attackers to create, overwrite, rename, or delete arbitrary files via a crafted document. | ||||
| CVE-2010-3192 | 1 Gnu | 1 Glibc | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1089 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Glibc, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The addmntent function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier does not report an error status for failed attempts to write to the /etc/mtab file, which makes it easier for local users to trigger corruption of this file, as demonstrated by writes from a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0296. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0242 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Glibc, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the extend_buffers function in the regular expression matcher (posix/regexec.c) in glibc, possibly 2.17 and earlier, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and crash) via crafted multibyte characters. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1071 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 3 Eglibc, Glibc, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.12.2 and Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC) allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long UTF8 string that is used in an fnmatch call, aka a "stack extension attack," a related issue to CVE-2010-2898, CVE-2010-1917, and CVE-2007-4782, as originally reported for use of this library by Google Chrome. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1658 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 2 Glibc, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| ld.so in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.13 and earlier expands the $ORIGIN dynamic string token when RPATH is composed entirely of this token, which might allow local users to gain privileges by creating a hard link in an arbitrary directory to a (1) setuid or (2) setgid program with this RPATH value, and then executing the program with a crafted value for the LD_PRELOAD environment variable, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-3847 and CVE-2011-0536. NOTE: it is not expected that any standard operating-system distribution would ship an applicable setuid or setgid program. | ||||