Total
9692 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27784 | 1 Applio | 1 Applio | 2025-08-01 | 7.5 High |
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.8-bugfix and prior are vulnerable to arbitrary file read in train.py's `export_pth` function. This issue may lead to reading arbitrary files on the Applio server. It can also be used in conjunction with blind server-side request forgery to read files from servers on the internal network that the Applio server has access to. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27785 | 1 Applio | 1 Applio | 2025-08-01 | 7.5 High |
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.8-bugfix and prior are vulnerable to arbitrary file read in train.py's `export_index` function. This issue may lead to reading arbitrary files on the Applio server. It can also be used in conjunction with blind server-side request forgery to read files from servers on the internal network that the Applio server has access to. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30214 | 1 Frappe | 1 Frappe | 2025-08-01 | 7.5 High |
| Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to versions 14.89.0 and 15.51.0, making crafted requests could lead to information disclosure that could further lead to account takeover. Versions 14.89.0 and 15.51.0 fix the issue. There's no workaround to fix this without upgrading. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20129 | 1 Cisco | 2 Socialminer, Unified Contact Center Express | 2025-08-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based chat interface of Cisco Customer Collaboration Platform (CCP), formerly Cisco SocialMiner, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to persuade users to disclose sensitive data. This vulnerability is due to improper sanitization of HTTP requests that are sent to the web-based chat interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to the chat interface of a targeted user on a vulnerable server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to redirect chat traffic to a server that is under their control, resulting in sensitive information being redirected to the attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43246 | 1 Apple | 3 Macos, Macos Sequoia, Macos Sonoma | 2025-07-31 | 5.5 Medium |
| This issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6, macOS Sonoma 14.7.7. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31279 | 1 Apple | 5 Ipados, Macos, Macos Sequoia and 2 more | 2025-07-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6, iPadOS 17.7.9, macOS Sonoma 14.7.7, macOS Ventura 13.7.7. An app may be able to fingerprint the user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43189 | 1 Apple | 3 Macos, Macos Sequoia, Macos Sonoma | 2025-07-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| This issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6, macOS Sonoma 14.7.7. A malicious app may be able to read kernel memory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43215 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Macos Sequoia | 2025-07-31 | 5.5 Medium |
| The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6. Processing a maliciously crafted image may result in disclosure of process memory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43018 | 1 Hp | 5 Hp, Laserjet Mfp M428, Laserjet Mfp M429 and 2 more | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| Certain HP LaserJet Pro printers may be vulnerable to information disclosure when a non-authenticated user queries a device’s local address book. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20396 | 1 Cisco | 2 Webex App, Webex Teams | 2025-07-31 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the protocol handlers of Cisco Webex App could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive information. This vulnerability exists because the affected application does not safely handle file protocol handlers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a link that is designed to cause the application to send requests. If the attacker can observe transmitted traffic in a privileged network position, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to capture sensitive information, including credential information, from the requests. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36850 | 1 Sitecore | 1 Sitecore | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exits in Sitecore JSS React Sample Application 11.0.0 - 14.0.1 that may cause page content intended for one user to be shown to another user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3508 | 1 Hp | 4 Designjet T1700, Designjet Z6, Designjet Z9 and 1 more | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| Certain HP DesignJet products may be vulnerable to information disclosure though printer's web interface allowing unauthenticated users to view sensitive print job information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24919 | 1 Checkpoint | 7 Cloudguard Network, Cloudguard Network Security, Quantum Security Gateway and 4 more | 2025-07-30 | 8.6 High |
| Potentially allowing an attacker to read certain information on Check Point Security Gateways once connected to the internet and enabled with remote Access VPN or Mobile Access Software Blades. A Security fix that mitigates this vulnerability is available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11053 | 3 Haxx, Netapp, Redhat | 20 Curl, Bootstrap Os, H300s and 17 more | 2025-07-30 | 3.4 Low |
| When asked to both use a `.netrc` file for credentials and to follow HTTP redirects, curl could leak the password used for the first host to the followed-to host under certain circumstances. This flaw only manifests itself if the netrc file has an entry that matches the redirect target hostname but the entry either omits just the password or omits both login and password. | ||||
| CVE-2025-38085 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-07-30 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: fix huge_pmd_unshare() vs GUP-fast race huge_pmd_unshare() drops a reference on a page table that may have previously been shared across processes, potentially turning it into a normal page table used in another process in which unrelated VMAs can afterwards be installed. If this happens in the middle of a concurrent gup_fast(), gup_fast() could end up walking the page tables of another process. While I don't see any way in which that immediately leads to kernel memory corruption, it is really weird and unexpected. Fix it with an explicit broadcast IPI through tlb_remove_table_sync_one(), just like we do in khugepaged when removing page tables for a THP collapse. | ||||
| CVE-2025-38084 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-07-30 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: unshare page tables during VMA split, not before Currently, __split_vma() triggers hugetlb page table unsharing through vm_ops->may_split(). This happens before the VMA lock and rmap locks are taken - which is too early, it allows racing VMA-locked page faults in our process and racing rmap walks from other processes to cause page tables to be shared again before we actually perform the split. Fix it by explicitly calling into the hugetlb unshare logic from __split_vma() in the same place where THP splitting also happens. At that point, both the VMA and the rmap(s) are write-locked. An annoying detail is that we can now call into the helper hugetlb_unshare_pmds() from two different locking contexts: 1. from hugetlb_split(), holding: - mmap lock (exclusively) - VMA lock - file rmap lock (exclusively) 2. hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds(), which I think is designed to be able to call us with only the mmap lock held (in shared mode), but currently only runs while holding mmap lock (exclusively) and VMA lock Backporting note: This commit fixes a racy protection that was introduced in commit b30c14cd6102 ("hugetlb: unshare some PMDs when splitting VMAs"); that commit claimed to fix an issue introduced in 5.13, but it should actually also go all the way back. [jannh@google.com: v2] | ||||
| CVE-2008-0655 | 2 Adobe, Redhat | 3 Acrobat, Acrobat Reader, Rhel Extras | 2025-07-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 8.1.2 have unknown impact and attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7331 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Internet Explorer, Windows 7, Windows 8 and 7 more | 2025-07-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Microsoft.XMLDOM ActiveX control in Microsoft Windows 8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to determine the existence of local pathnames, UNC share pathnames, intranet hostnames, and intranet IP addresses by examining error codes, as demonstrated by a res:// URL, and exploited in the wild in February 2014. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0310 | 5 Adobe, Apple, Linux and 2 more | 5 Flash Player, Mac Os X, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2025-07-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.262 and 14.x through 16.x before 16.0.0.287 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.438 on Linux does not properly restrict discovery of memory addresses, which allows attackers to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism on Windows, and have an unspecified impact on other platforms, via unknown vectors, as exploited in the wild in January 2015. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5317 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-07-30 | 7.5 High |
| The Fingerprints pages in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive job and build name information via a direct request. | ||||