Total
470 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-11485 | 1 Code4berry | 1 Decoration Management System | 2024-12-02 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Code4Berry Decoration Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /decoration/admin/userregister.php of the component User Handler. The manipulation leads to permission issues. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11486 | 1 Code4berry | 1 Decoration Management System | 2024-12-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Code4Berry Decoration Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /decoration/admin/user_permission.php of the component User Permission Handler. The manipulation leads to permission issues. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39576 | 1 Dell | 1 Power Manager | 2024-11-26 | 8.8 High |
| Dell Power Manager (DPM), versions 3.15.0 and prior, contains an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution and Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45759 | 1 Dell | 1 Data Domain Operating System | 2024-11-26 | 6.8 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions prior to 8.1.0.0, 7.13.1.10, 7.10.1.40, and 7.7.5.50, contains an escalation of privilege vulnerability. A local low privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized execution of certain commands to overwrite system config of the application. Exploitation may lead to denial of service of system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45187 | 1 Mage | 1 Mage-ai | 2024-11-25 | 7.1 High |
| Guest users in the Mage AI framework that remain logged in after their accounts are deleted, are mistakenly given high privileges and specifically given access to remotely execute arbitrary code through the Mage AI terminal server | ||||
| CVE-2024-9476 | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Grafana Labs Grafana OSS and Enterprise allows Privilege Escalation allows users to gain access to resources from other organizations within the same Grafana instance via the Grafana Cloud Migration Assistant.This vulnerability will only affect users who utilize the Organizations feature to isolate resources on their Grafana instance. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52442 | 1 Userplus | 1 Userplus | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Userplus UserPlus allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects UserPlus: from n/a through 2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40433 | 1 Tencent | 1 Wechat | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Tencent wechat v.8.0.37 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the web-view component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37293 | 2 Amazon, Awslabs | 2 Aws Deployment Framework, Aws-deployment-framework | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 High |
| The AWS Deployment Framework (ADF) is a framework to manage and deploy resources across multiple AWS accounts and regions within an AWS Organization. ADF allows for staged, parallel, multi-account, cross-region deployments of applications or resources via the structure defined in AWS Organizations while taking advantage of services such as AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeCommit to alleviate the heavy lifting and management compared to a traditional CI/CD setup. ADF contains a bootstrap process that is responsible to deploy ADF's bootstrap stacks to facilitate multi-account cross-region deployments. The ADF bootstrap process relies on elevated privileges to perform this task. Two versions of the bootstrap process exist; a code-change driven pipeline using AWS CodeBuild and an event-driven state machine using AWS Lambda. If an actor has permissions to change the behavior of the CodeBuild project or the Lambda function, they would be able to escalate their privileges. Prior to version 4.0.0, the bootstrap CodeBuild role provides access to the `sts:AssumeRole` operation without further restrictions. Therefore, it is able to assume into any AWS Account in the AWS Organization with the elevated privileges provided by the cross-account access role. By default, this role is not restricted when it is created by AWS Organizations, providing Administrator level access to the AWS resources in the AWS Account. The patches for this issue are included in `aws-deployment-framework` version 4.0.0. As a temporary mitigation, add a permissions boundary to the roles created by ADF in the management account. The permissions boundary should deny all IAM and STS actions. This permissions boundary should be in place until you upgrade ADF or bootstrap a new account. While the permissions boundary is in place, the account management and bootstrapping of accounts are unable to create, update, or assume into roles. This mitigates the privilege escalation risk, but also disables ADF's ability to create, manage, and bootstrap accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37134 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain root-level access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37132 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service and Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36587 | 1 Dnscrypt | 1 Dnscrypt-proxy | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Insecure permissions in DNSCrypt-proxy v2.0.0alpha9 to v2.1.5 allows non-privileged attackers to escalate privileges to root via overwriting the binary dnscrypt-proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36534 | 2024-11-21 | 8.4 High | ||
| Insecure permissions in hwameistor v0.14.3 allows attackers to access sensitive data and escalate privileges by obtaining the service account's token. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31912 | 1 Ibm | 2 Mq, Mq Appliance | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM MQ 9.3 LTS and 9.3 CD could allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges under certain configurations due to incorrect privilege assignment. IBM X-Force ID: 289894. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31760 | 2024-11-21 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| An issue in sanluan flipped-aurora gin-vue-admin 2.4.x allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the Session Expiration component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27460 | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A privilege escalation exists in the updater for Plantronics Hub 3.25.1 and below. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27273 | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High | ||
| IBM AIX's Unix domain (AIX 7.2, 7.3, VIOS 3.1, and VIOS 4.1) datagram socket implementation could potentially expose applications using Unix domain datagram sockets with SO_PEERID operation and may lead to privilege escalation. IBM X-Force ID: 284903. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23794 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2024-11-21 | 5.2 Medium |
| An incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in the inline editing functionality of OTRS can lead to privilege escalation. This flaw allows an agent with read-only permissions to gain full access to a ticket. This issue arises in very rare instances when an admin has previously enabled the setting 'RequiredLock' of 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' in the system configuration.This issue affects OTRS: * 8.0.X * 2023.X * from 2024.X through 2024.4.x | ||||
| CVE-2024-20389 | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the ConfD CLI and the Cisco Crosswork Network Services Orchestrator CLI could allow an authenticated, low-privileged, local attacker to read and write arbitrary files as root on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to improper authorization enforcement when specific CLI commands are used. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by executing an affected CLI command with crafted arguments. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read or write arbitrary files on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the root user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20320 | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the SSH client feature of Cisco IOS XR Software for Cisco 8000 Series Routers and Cisco Network Convergence System (NCS) 540 Series and 5700 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments that are included with the SSH client CLI command. An attacker with low-privileged access to an affected device could exploit this vulnerability by issuing a crafted SSH client command to the CLI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root on the affected device. | ||||