Filtered by vendor Jenkins
Subscriptions
Total
1828 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1000089 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Builds in Jenkins are associated with an authentication that controls the permissions that the build has to interact with other elements in Jenkins. The Pipeline: Build Step Plugin did not check the build authentication it was running as and allowed triggering any other project in Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4988 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Build Failure Analyzer | 2025-04-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Build Failure Analyzer plugin before 1.16.0 in Jenkins allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an unspecified parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3102 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Script Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Script Security plugin before 1.18.1 in Jenkins might allow remote attackers to bypass a Groovy sandbox protection mechanism via a plugin that performs (1) direct field access or (2) get/set array operations. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000086 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Periodic Backup | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Periodic Backup Plugin did not perform any permission checks, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to change its settings, trigger backups, restore backups, download backups, and also delete all previous backups via log rotation. Additionally, the plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000093 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Poll Scm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Poll SCM Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to initiate polling of projects with a known name. While Jenkins in general does not consider polling to be a protection-worthy action as it's similar to cache invalidation, the plugin specifically adds a permission to be able to use this functionality, and this issue undermines that permission. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3101 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Extra Columns | 2025-04-20 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Extra Columns plugin before 1.17 in Jenkins allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by leveraging failure to filter tool tips through the configured markup formatter. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4987 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Image Gallery | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the Image Gallery plugin before 1.4 in Jenkins allows remote attackers to list arbitrary directories and read arbitrary files via unspecified form fields. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000088 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Sidebar Link | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Sidebar Link plugin allows users able to configure jobs, views, and agents to add entries to the sidebar of these objects. There was no input validation, which meant users were able to use javascript: schemes for these links. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9634 | 2 Apache, Jenkins | 2 Tomcat, Jenkins | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Jenkins before 1.586 does not set the secure flag on session cookies when run on Tomcat 7.0.41 or later, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture cookies by intercepting their transmission within an HTTP session. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000096 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Arbitrary code execution due to incomplete sandbox protection: Constructors, instance variable initializers, and instance initializers in Pipeline scripts were not subject to sandbox protection, and could therefore execute arbitrary code. This could be exploited e.g. by regular Jenkins users with the permission to configure Pipelines in Jenkins, or by trusted committers to repositories containing Jenkinsfiles. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000102 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Static Analysis Utilities | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Details view of some Static Analysis Utilities based plugins, was vulnerable to a persisted cross-site scripting vulnerability: Malicious users able to influence the input to these plugins, for example the console output which is parsed to extract build warnings (Warnings Plugin), could insert arbitrary HTML into this view. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000362 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The re-key admin monitor was introduced in Jenkins 1.498 and re-encrypted all secrets in JENKINS_HOME with a new key. It also created a backup directory with all old secrets, and the key used to encrypt them. These backups were world-readable and not removed afterwards. Jenkins now deletes the backup directory, if present. Upgrading from before 1.498 will no longer create a backup directory. Administrators relying on file access permissions in their manually created backups are advised to check them for the directory $JENKINS_HOME/jenkins.security.RekeySecretAdminMonitor/backups, and delete it if present. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000243 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Favorite Plugin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Jenkins Favorite Plugin 2.1.4 and older does not perform permission checks when changing favorite status, allowing any user to set any other user's favorites | ||||
| CVE-2016-4986 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Tap | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the TAP plugin before 1.25 in Jenkins allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an unspecified parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000114 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Datadog | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Datadog Plugin stores an API key to access the Datadog service in the global Jenkins configuration. While the API key is stored encrypted on disk, it was transmitted in plain text as part of the configuration form. This could result in exposure of the API key for example through browser extensions or cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. The Datadog Plugin now encrypts the API key transmitted to administrators viewing the global configuration form. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000113 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Deploy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Deploy to container Plugin stored passwords unencrypted as part of its configuration. This allowed users with Jenkins master local file system access, or users with Extended Read access to the jobs it is used in, to retrieve those passwords. The Deploy to container Plugin now integrates with Credentials Plugin to store passwords securely, and automatically migrates existing passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000105 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Blue Ocean | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The optional Run/Artifacts permission can be enabled by setting a Java system property. Blue Ocean did not check this permission before providing access to archived artifacts, Item/Read permission was sufficient. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000087 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GitHub Branch Source provides a list of applicable credential IDs to allow users configuring a job to select the one they'd like to use. This functionality did not check permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read permission to get a list of valid credentials IDs. Those could be used as part of an attack to capture the credentials using another vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000092 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Git, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Git Plugin connects to a user-specified Git repository as part of form validation. An attacker with no direct access to Jenkins but able to guess at a username/password credentials ID could trick a developer with job configuration permissions into following a link with a maliciously crafted Jenkins URL which would result in the Jenkins Git client sending the username and password to an attacker-controlled server. | ||||