Total
1544 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-40544 | 1 Publiccms | 1 Publiccms | 2025-03-26 | 8.8 High |
| PublicCMS v4.0.202302.e was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/#maintenance_sysTask/edit. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2691 | 1 Nossrf Project | 1 Nossrf | 2025-03-26 | 8.2 High |
| Versions of the package nossrf before 1.0.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide a hostname that resolves to a local or reserved IP address space and bypass the SSRF protection mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27888 | 2025-03-25 | N/A | ||
| Severity: medium (5.8) / important Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Apache Druid. This issue affects all previous Druid versions. When using the Druid management proxy, a request that has a specially crafted URL could be used to redirect the request to an arbitrary server instead. This has the potential for XSS or XSRF. The user is required to be authenticated for this exploit. The management proxy is enabled in Druid's out-of-box configuration. It may be disabled to mitigate this vulnerability. If the management proxy is disabled, some web console features will not work properly, but core functionality is unaffected. Users are recommended to upgrade to Druid 31.0.2 or Druid 32.0.1, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45085 | 1 Gruparge | 1 Smartpower Web | 2025-03-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Group Arge Energy and Control Systems Smartpower Web allows : Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Smartpower Web: before 23.01.01. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1970 | 2025-03-24 | 7.6 High | ||
| The Export and Import Users and Customers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.2 via the validate_file() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0574 | 1 Yugabyte | 1 Yugabytedb Managed | 2025-03-24 | 6.8 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in YugaByte, Inc. Yugabyte Managed allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, Communication Channel Manipulation, Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Yugabyte Managed: from 2.0.0.0 through 2.13.0.0 | ||||
| CVE-2024-22217 | 1 Terminalfour | 1 Terminalfour | 2025-03-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Terminalfour before 8.3.19 allows authenticated users to use specific features to access internal services including sensitive information on the server that Terminalfour runs on. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13856 | 2025-03-24 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Your Friendly Drag and Drop Page Builder — Make Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.10 via the make_builder_ajax_subscribe() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45317 | 2025-03-22 | 7.5 High | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40438 | 10 Apache, Broadcom, Debian and 7 more | 25 Http Server, Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux and 22 more | 2025-03-21 | 9 Critical |
| A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10524 | 1 Gnu | 1 Wget | 2025-03-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Applications that use Wget to access a remote resource using shorthand URLs and pass arbitrary user credentials in the URL are vulnerable. In these cases attackers can enter crafted credentials which will cause Wget to access an arbitrary host. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27777 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) in `model_download.py` (line 195 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The blind SSRF can also be coupled with a arbitrary file read (e.g., CVE-2025-27784) to read files from hosts on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach, which would make it a full SSRF. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27776 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) and file write in `model_download.py` (line 240 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The blind SSRF can also be coupled with the arbitrary file read CVE-2025-27784 to read files from hosts on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach, which would make it a full SSRF. The file write allows for writing files on the server, which can be coupled with other vulnerabilities, for example an unsafe deserialization, to achieve remote code execution on the Applio server. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27775 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) and file write in `model_download.py` (line 143 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The file write allows for writing files on the server, which can be coupled with other vulnerabilities, for example an unsafe deserialization, to achieve remote code execution on the Applio server. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27774 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) and file write in `model_download.py` (line 156 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The blind SSRF can also be coupled with the an arbitrary file read (e.g., CVE-2025-27784) to read files from hosts on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach, which would make it a full SSRF. The file write allows for writing files on the server, which can be coupled with other vulnerabilities, for example an unsafe deserialization, to achieve remote code execution on the Applio server. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11449 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability in haotian-liu/llava version 1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6) allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through the /run/predict endpoint. An attacker can gain unauthorized access to internal networks or the AWS metadata endpoint by sending crafted requests that exploit insufficient validation of the path parameter. This flaw can lead to unauthorized network access, sensitive data exposure, and further exploitation within the network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12068 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in haotian-liu/llava, affecting version git c121f04. This vulnerability allows an attacker to make the server perform HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs, potentially accessing sensitive data that is only accessible from the server, such as AWS metadata credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7959 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| The `/openai/models` endpoint in open-webui/open-webui version 0.3.8 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An attacker can change the OpenAI URL to any URL without checks, causing the endpoint to send a request to the specified URL and return the output. This vulnerability allows the attacker to access internal services and potentially gain command execution by accessing instance secrets. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0188 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt version 20240914. The vulnerability allows an attacker to construct a response link by saving the response in a folder named after the SHA-1 hash of the target URL. This enables the attacker to access the response directly, potentially leading to unauthorized access to internal systems, data theft, service disruption, or further attacks such as port scanning and accessing metadata endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12775 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| langgenius/dify version 0.10.1 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the test functionality for the Create Custom Tool option via the REST API `POST /console/api/workspaces/current/tool-provider/api/test/pre`. Attackers can set the `url` in the `servers` dictionary in OpenAI's schema with arbitrary URL targets, allowing them to abuse the victim server's credentials to access unauthorized web resources. | ||||