Total
1544 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-44721 | 1 Seacms | 1 Seacms | 2025-03-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| SeaCMS v13.1 was discovered to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at /admin_reslib.php. | ||||
| CVE-2021-21973 | 1 Vmware | 2 Cloud Foundation, Vcenter Server | 2025-03-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The vSphere Client (HTML5) contains an SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) vulnerability due to improper validation of URLs in a vCenter Server plugin. A malicious actor with network access to port 443 may exploit this issue by sending a POST request to vCenter Server plugin leading to information disclosure. This affects: VMware vCenter Server (7.x before 7.0 U1c, 6.7 before 6.7 U3l and 6.5 before 6.5 U3n) and VMware Cloud Foundation (4.x before 4.2 and 3.x before 3.10.1.2). | ||||
| CVE-2023-24623 | 1 Paranoidhttp Project | 1 Paranoidhttp | 2025-03-28 | 7.5 High |
| Paranoidhttp before 0.3.0 allows SSRF because [::] is equivalent to the 127.0.0.1 address, but does not match the filter for private addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24622 | 1 Includesecurity | 1 Safeurl-python | 2025-03-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| isInList in the safeurl-python package before 1.2 for Python has an insufficiently restrictive regular expression for external domains, leading to SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4335 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-03-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| A blind SSRF vulnerability was identified in all versions of GitLab EE prior to 15.4.6, 15.5 prior to 15.5.5, and 15.6 prior to 15.6.1 which allows an attacker to connect to a local host. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4201 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-03-27 | 3.5 Low |
| A blind SSRF in GitLab CE/EE affecting all from 11.3 prior to 15.4.6, 15.5 prior to 15.5.5, and 15.6 prior to 15.6.1 allows an attacker to connect to local addresses when configuring a malicious GitLab Runner. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24495 | 1 Tenable | 1 Tenable.sc | 2025-03-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Tenable.sc due to improper validation of session & user-accessible input data. A privileged, authenticated remote attacker could interact with external and internal services covertly. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24060 | 1 Havenweb | 1 Haven | 2025-03-27 | 5 Medium |
| Haven 5d15944 allows Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the feed[url]= Feeds functionality. Authenticated users with the ability to create new RSS Feeds or add RSS Feeds can supply an arbitrary hostname (or even the hostname of the Haven server itself). NOTE: this product has significant usage but does not have numbered releases; ordinary end users may typically use the master branch. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30914 | 2025-03-27 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in XpeedStudio Metform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Metform: from n/a through 3.9.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37033 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2025-03-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| In dotCMS 5.x-22.06, TempFileAPI allows a user to create a temporary file based on a passed in URL, while attempting to block any SSRF access to local IP addresses or private subnets. In resolving this URL, the TempFileAPI follows any 302 redirects that the remote URL returns. Because there is no re-validation of the redirect URL, the TempFileAPI can be used to return data from those local/private hosts that should not be accessible remotely. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10206 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an unauthenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10207 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an authenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27406 | 2025-03-27 | 7.7 High | ||
| Icinga Reporting is the central component for reporting related functionality in the monitoring web frontend and framework Icinga Web 2. A vulnerability present in versions 0.10.0 through 1.0.2 allows to set up a template that allows to embed arbitrary Javascript. This enables the attacker to act on behalf of the user, if the template is being previewed; and act on behalf of the headless browser, if a report using the template is printed to PDF. This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.3 of Icinga Reporting. As a workaround, review all templates and remove suspicious settings. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1912 | 2025-03-27 | 7.6 High | ||
| The Product Import Export for WooCommerce – Import Export Product CSV Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0 via the validate_file() Function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13411 | 2025-03-27 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Zapier for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1 via the updated_user() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22672 | 2025-03-27 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SuitePlugins Video & Photo Gallery for Ultimate Member allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Video & Photo Gallery for Ultimate Member: from n/a through 1.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13923 | 1 Webtoffee | 1 Order Export \& Order Import For Woocommerce | 2025-03-26 | 7.6 High |
| The Order Export & Order Import for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.0 via the validate_file() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40544 | 1 Publiccms | 1 Publiccms | 2025-03-26 | 8.8 High |
| PublicCMS v4.0.202302.e was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/#maintenance_sysTask/edit. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2691 | 1 Nossrf Project | 1 Nossrf | 2025-03-26 | 8.2 High |
| Versions of the package nossrf before 1.0.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide a hostname that resolves to a local or reserved IP address space and bypass the SSRF protection mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27888 | 2025-03-25 | N/A | ||
| Severity: medium (5.8) / important Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Apache Druid. This issue affects all previous Druid versions. When using the Druid management proxy, a request that has a specially crafted URL could be used to redirect the request to an arbitrary server instead. This has the potential for XSS or XSRF. The user is required to be authenticated for this exploit. The management proxy is enabled in Druid's out-of-box configuration. It may be disabled to mitigate this vulnerability. If the management proxy is disabled, some web console features will not work properly, but core functionality is unaffected. Users are recommended to upgrade to Druid 31.0.2 or Druid 32.0.1, which fixes the issue. | ||||