Total
7108 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-50611 | 1 Cyclonedx | 1 Cdxgen | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| CycloneDX cdxgen through 10.10.7, when run against an untrusted codebase, may execute code contained within build-related files such as build.gradle.kts, a similar issue to CVE-2022-24441. cdxgen is used by, for example, OWASP dep-scan. NOTE: this has been characterized as a design limitation, rather than an implementation mistake. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46569 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Open Policy Agent (OPA) is an open source, general-purpose policy engine. Prior to version 1.4.0, when run as a server, OPA exposes an HTTP Data API for reading and writing documents. Requesting a virtual document through the Data API entails policy evaluation, where a Rego query containing a single data document reference is constructed from the requested path. This query is then used for policy evaluation. A HTTP request path can be crafted in a way that injects Rego code into the constructed query. The evaluation result cannot be made to return any other data than what is generated by the requested path, but this path can be misdirected, and the injected Rego code can be crafted to make the query succeed or fail; opening up for oracle attacks or, given the right circumstances, erroneous policy decision results. Furthermore, the injected code can be crafted to be computationally expensive, resulting in a Denial Of Service (DoS) attack. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0. A workaround involves having network access to OPA’s RESTful APIs being limited to `localhost` and/or trusted networks, unless necessary for production reasons. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50123 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability exists that could cause remote command execution by a privileged account when the server is accessed via a console and through exploitation of the hostname input. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50739 | 1 Omni-tools | 1 Omni-tools | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| iib0011 omni-tools v0.4.0 is vulnerable to remote code execution via unsafe JSON deserialization. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50817 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Python-Future 1.0.0 module allows for arbitrary code execution via the unintended import of a file named test.py. When the module is loaded, it automatically imports test.py, if present in the same directory or in the sys.path. This behavior can be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to write files to the server, allowing the execution of arbitrary code. NOTE: Multiple third parties have disputed this issue and stated that it is not a security flaw in python-future and is a documented feature of Python’s import system in the handling of sys.path. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33183 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Isaac-gr00t | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Isaac-GR00T for all platforms contains a vulnerability in a Python component, where an attacker could cause a code injection issue. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43010 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition or on Premise (SCM Master Data Layer (MDL)) allows an authenticated attacker with SAP standard authorization to execute a certain function module remotely and replace arbitrary ABAP programs, including SAP standard programs. This is due to lack of input validation and no authorization checks. This has low Confidentiality impact but high impact on integrity and availability to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52385 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in Studio 3T v.2025.1.0 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload to the child_process module | ||||
| CVE-2025-5333 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Remote attackers can execute arbitrary code in the context of the vulnerable service process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53419 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Delta Electronics COMMGR has Code Injection vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24294 | 1 Blackprint | 1 Blackprint Engine | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Prototype Pollution issue in Blackprint @blackprint/engine v.0.9.0 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the _utils.setDeepProperty function of engine.min.js. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13486 | 2 Hwk-fr, Wordpress | 2 Advanced Custom Fields, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in versions 0.9.0.5 through 0.9.1.1 via the prepare_form() function. This is due to the function accepting user input and then passing that through call_user_func_array(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server, which can be leveraged to inject backdoors or create new administrative user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15454 | 1 Zhanglun | 1 Lettura | 2026-04-15 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability was detected in zhanglun lettura up to 0.1.22. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file src/components/ArticleView/ContentRender.tsx of the component RSS Handler. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is identified as 67213093db9923e828a6e3fd8696a998c85da2d4. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0219 | 2026-04-15 | 2.4 Low | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Trimble SPS851 488.01. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Receiver Status Identity Tab. The manipulation of the argument System Name leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0220 | 2026-04-15 | 2.4 Low | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Trimble SPS851 488.01. This affects an unknown part of the component Ethernet Configuration Menu. The manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11945 | 1 Toeverything | 1 Affine | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was identified in toeverything AFFiNE up to 0.24.1. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Avatar Upload Image Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61927 | 1 Capricorn86 | 1 Happy-dom | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. Happy DOM v19 and lower contains a security vulnerability that puts the owner system at the risk of RCE (Remote Code Execution) attacks. A Node.js VM Context is not an isolated environment, and if the user runs untrusted JavaScript code within the Happy DOM VM Context, it may escape the VM and get access to process level functionality. It seems like what the attacker can get control over depends on if the process is using ESM or CommonJS. With CommonJS the attacker can get hold of the `require()` function to import modules. Happy DOM has JavaScript evaluation enabled by default. This may not be obvious to the consumer of Happy DOM and can potentially put the user at risk if untrusted code is executed within the environment. Version 20.0.0 patches the issue by changing JavaScript evaluation to be disabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30013 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| SAP ERP BW Business Content is vulnerable to OS Command Injection through certain function modules. These function modules, when executed with elevated privileges, improperly handle user input, allowing attacker to inject arbitrary OS commands. This vulnerability allows the execution of unintended commands on the underlying system, posing a significant security risk to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30056 | 1 Cgm | 1 Clininet | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The RunCommand function accepts any parameter, which is then passed for execution in the shell. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30057 | 1 Cgm | 1 Clininet | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In UHCRTFDoc, the filename parameter can be exploited to execute arbitrary code via command injection into the system() call in the ConvertToPDF function. | ||||