Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Satellite
Subscriptions
Total
543 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-39325 | 4 Fedoraproject, Golang, Netapp and 1 more | 53 Fedora, Go, Http2 and 50 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A malicious HTTP/2 client which rapidly creates requests and immediately resets them can cause excessive server resource consumption. While the total number of requests is bounded by the http2.Server.MaxConcurrentStreams setting, resetting an in-progress request allows the attacker to create a new request while the existing one is still executing. With the fix applied, HTTP/2 servers now bound the number of simultaneously executing handler goroutines to the stream concurrency limit (MaxConcurrentStreams). New requests arriving when at the limit (which can only happen after the client has reset an existing, in-flight request) will be queued until a handler exits. If the request queue grows too large, the server will terminate the connection. This issue is also fixed in golang.org/x/net/http2 for users manually configuring HTTP/2. The default stream concurrency limit is 250 streams (requests) per HTTP/2 connection. This value may be adjusted using the golang.org/x/net/http2 package; see the Server.MaxConcurrentStreams setting and the ConfigureServer function. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29406 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 19 Go, Advanced Cluster Security, Cryostat and 16 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| The HTTP/1 client does not fully validate the contents of the Host header. A maliciously crafted Host header can inject additional headers or entire requests. With fix, the HTTP/1 client now refuses to send requests containing an invalid Request.Host or Request.URL.Host value. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26049 | 4 Debian, Eclipse, Netapp and 1 more | 15 Debian Linux, Jetty, Active Iq Unified Manager and 12 more | 2025-02-13 | 2.4 Low |
| Jetty is a java based web server and servlet engine. Nonstandard cookie parsing in Jetty may allow an attacker to smuggle cookies within other cookies, or otherwise perform unintended behavior by tampering with the cookie parsing mechanism. If Jetty sees a cookie VALUE that starts with `"` (double quote), it will continue to read the cookie string until it sees a closing quote -- even if a semicolon is encountered. So, a cookie header such as: `DISPLAY_LANGUAGE="b; JSESSIONID=1337; c=d"` will be parsed as one cookie, with the name DISPLAY_LANGUAGE and a value of b; JSESSIONID=1337; c=d instead of 3 separate cookies. This has security implications because if, say, JSESSIONID is an HttpOnly cookie, and the DISPLAY_LANGUAGE cookie value is rendered on the page, an attacker can smuggle the JSESSIONID cookie into the DISPLAY_LANGUAGE cookie and thereby exfiltrate it. This is significant when an intermediary is enacting some policy based on cookies, so a smuggled cookie can bypass that policy yet still be seen by the Jetty server or its logging system. This issue has been addressed in versions 9.4.51, 10.0.14, 11.0.14, and 12.0.0.beta0 and users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0809 | 2 Eclipse, Redhat | 3 Mosquitto, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-02-13 | 5.8 Medium |
| In Mosquitto before 2.0.16, excessive memory is allocated based on malicious initial packets that are not CONNECT packets. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41717 | 3 Fedoraproject, Golang, Redhat | 25 Fedora, Go, Http2 and 22 more | 2025-02-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| An attacker can cause excessive memory growth in a Go server accepting HTTP/2 requests. HTTP/2 server connections contain a cache of HTTP header keys sent by the client. While the total number of entries in this cache is capped, an attacker sending very large keys can cause the server to allocate approximately 64 MiB per open connection. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41323 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Rhui, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34265 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Rhui, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28347 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28346 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 4 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23518 | 4 Debian, Loofah Project, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Loofah, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| rails-html-sanitizer is responsible for sanitizing HTML fragments in Rails applications. Versions >= 1.0.3, < 1.4.4 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting via data URIs when used in combination with Loofah >= 2.1.0. This issue is patched in version 1.4.4. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23517 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Rubyonrails | 3 Debian Linux, Satellite, Rails Html Sanitizers | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| rails-html-sanitizer is responsible for sanitizing HTML fragments in Rails applications. Certain configurations of rails-html-sanitizer < 1.4.4 use an inefficient regular expression that is susceptible to excessive backtracking when attempting to sanitize certain SVG attributes. This may lead to a denial of service through CPU resource consumption. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.4. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23515 | 3 Debian, Loofah Project, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Loofah, Satellite | 2025-02-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| Loofah is a general library for manipulating and transforming HTML/XML documents and fragments, built on top of Nokogiri. Loofah >= 2.1.0, < 2.19.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting via the image/svg+xml media type in data URIs. This issue is patched in version 2.19.1. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0231 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Mina, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Handling of the close_notify SSL/TLS message does not lead to a connection closure, leading the server to retain the socket opened and to have the client potentially receive clear text messages afterward. Mitigation: 2.0.20 users should migrate to 2.0.21, 2.1.0 users should migrate to 2.1.1. This issue affects: Apache MINA. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3208 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2025-02-13 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27530 | 3 Debian, Rack, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Rack, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could allow an attacker to craft requests that can be abuse to cause multipart parsing to take longer than expected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44571 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 3 Rack, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsingcomponent of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1, 3.0.0.1. This could allow an attacker to craft an input that can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rackto take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial ofservice attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipartparsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtuallyall Rails applications) are impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44572 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 3 Rack, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing component of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1 and 3.0.0.1 could allow an attacker tocraft input that can cause RFC2183 multipart boundary parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44570 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 3 Rack, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack >= 1.5.0. A Carefully crafted input can cause the Range header parsing component in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that deal with Range requests (such as streaming applications, or applications that serve files) may be impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16782 | 4 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Rack and 1 more | 6 Fedora, Leap, Rack and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| There's a possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability in Rack (RubyGem rack). This vulnerability is patched in versions 1.6.12 and 2.0.8. Attackers may be able to find and hijack sessions by using timing attacks targeting the session id. Session ids are usually stored and indexed in a database that uses some kind of scheme for speeding up lookups of that session id. By carefully measuring the amount of time it takes to look up a session, an attacker may be able to find a valid session id and hijack the session. The session id itself may be generated randomly, but the way the session is indexed by the backing store does not use a secure comparison. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56374 | 1 Redhat | 4 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-02-12 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.) | ||||