Filtered by vendor Oracle
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Application Server
Subscriptions
Total
199 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2004-1367 | 1 Oracle | 9 Application Server, Collaboration Suite, E-business Suite and 6 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Oracle 10g Database Server, when installed with a password that contains an exclamation point ("!") for the (1) DBSNMP or (2) SYSMAN user, generates an error that logs the password in the world-readable postDBCreation.log file, which could allow local users to obtain that password and use it against SYS or SYSTEM accounts, which may have been installed with the same password. | ||||
| CVE-2004-1369 | 1 Oracle | 9 Application Server, Collaboration Suite, E-business Suite and 6 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The TNS Listener in Oracle 10g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (listener crash) via a malformed service_register_NSGR request containing a value that is used as an invalid offset for a pointer that references incorrect memory. | ||||
| CVE-2004-1370 | 1 Oracle | 9 Application Server, Collaboration Suite, E-business Suite and 6 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in PL/SQL procedures that run with definer rights in Oracle 9i and 10g allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands and gain privileges via (1) DBMS_EXPORT_EXTENSION, (2) WK_ACL.GET_ACL, (3) WK_ACL.STORE_ACL, (4) WK_ADM.COMPLETE_ACL_SNAPSHOT, (5) WK_ACL.DELETE_ACLS_WITH_STATEMENT, or (6) DRILOAD.VALIDATE_STMT. | ||||
| CVE-2004-1774 | 1 Oracle | 2 Application Server, Oracle10g | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the SDO_CODE_SIZE procedure of the MD2 package (MDSYS.MD2.SDO_CODE_SIZE) in Oracle 10g before 10.1.0.2 Patch 2 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long LAYER parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2004-2134 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Oracle toplink mapping workBench uses a weak encryption algorithm for passwords, which allows local users to decrypt the passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1383 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The OHS component 1.0.2 through 10.x, when UseWebcacheIP is disabled, in Oracle Application Server allows remote attackers to bypass HTTP Server mod_access restrictions via a request to the webcache TCP port 7778. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1495 | 1 Oracle | 3 Application Server, Oracle10g, Oracle9i | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Oracle Database 9i and 10g disables Fine Grained Audit (FGA) after the SYS user executes a SELECT statement on an FGA object, which makes it easier for attackers to escape detection. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1496 | 1 Oracle | 2 Application Server, Oracle10g | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The DBMS_Scheduler in Oracle 10g allows remote attackers with CREATE JOB privileges to gain additional privileges by changing SESSION_USER to the SYS user. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3445 | 1 Oracle | 2 Application Server, Database Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in HTTP Server in Oracle Database Server 8i up to 10.1.0.4.2 and Application Server 1.0.2.2 up to 10.1.2.0 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB30 and AS03 or (2) DB31 and AS05. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3449 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 9.0 up to 10.1.2.0 have unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) AS02 in Containers for J2EE, (2) AS07 in Internet Directory, (3) AS09 in Report Server, and (4) AS11 in Web Cache. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3453 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Web Cache in Oracle Application Server 1.0 up to 10.1.2.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) AS12 and (2) AS14. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0285 | 1 Oracle | 2 Application Server, Database Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Net component of Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.4, and Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# JN01. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0286 | 1 Oracle | 2 Application Server, Database Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server component of Oracle Database Server 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, and Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# OHS01. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0289 | 1 Oracle | 2 Application Server, E-business Suite | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 6.0.8.26(PS17) and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) REP05 and (2) REP06 in the Oracle Reports Developer component. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that REP05 is the same as CVE-2005-2378 and REP06 is the same as CVE-2005-2371, both of which involve directory traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0273 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Portal component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# AS01. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0274 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Server | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0.2 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# REP03. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1967 | 10 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 7 more | 26 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Fedora and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). | ||||
| CVE-2018-5407 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 4 more | 23 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.7 Medium |
| Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0735 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Netapp and 4 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Cloud Backup and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). | ||||