Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Security Guardium
Subscriptions
Total
114 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-3473 | 1 Ibm | 2 Guardium Data Protection, Security Guardium | 2026-02-26 | 6.7 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.1 could allow a local privileged user to escalate their privileges to root due to insecure inherited permissions created by the program. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49336 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-11-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.5 and 12.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36020 | 1 Ibm | 2 Guardium Data Protection, Security Guardium | 2025-10-22 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive credential information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25023 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-09-01 | 4.9 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.4 and 12.1 could allow a privileged user to read any file on the system due to incorrect privilege assignment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25029 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-08-28 | 4.9 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow a privileged user to download any file on the system due to improper escaping of input. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25026 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-08-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information due to an incorrect authentication check. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3440 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-08-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.5 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25025 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-08-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2021-39077 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2025-07-23 | 4.4 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5, 10.6, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, and 11.4 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by a local privileged user. IBM X-Force ID: 215587. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47717 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-13 | 4.4 Medium |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow a privileged user to perform unauthorized actions that could lead to a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 271690. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1257 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 124684. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1596 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor could allow a local attacker to obtain highly sensitive information via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 132550. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1267 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code. IBM X-Force ID: 124742. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1261 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 124736. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1264 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not prove or insufficiently proves that the actors identity is correct which can lead to exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124739. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1271 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties. IBM X-Force ID: 124746. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1253 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 124633. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1598 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 132611. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1270 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not renew a session variable after a successful authentication which could lead to session fixation/hijacking vulnerability. This could force a user to utilize a cookie that may be known to an attacker. IBM X-Force ID: 124745. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0238 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, 9.5, 10.0, and 10.1 transmits sensitive data in cleartext in the query of the request. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 110409 | ||||