Filtered by vendor Heymrun
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Heym
Subscriptions
Total
25 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-67542 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-11-13 | 7.1 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools is reachable by any authenticated user (lowest role; no admin/workflow association) and fetches an attacker-supplied URL through the sse and streamable_http transports with no scheme / private-IP / allowlist / redirect guard. The transport error is reflected in the HTTP 422 response, giving a semi-blind SSRF oracle, and the attacker also controls the outbound request headers. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67545 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-11-13 | 7.4 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.73, the HTTP workflow node in Heym makes outbound HTTP requests to user-supplied URLs without validation of the target host or IP address. If a workflow author has already configured an HTTP node that targets internal addresses such as cloud metadata endpoints or private network hosts, and exposed the workflow with anonymous execution, an unauthenticated attacker can trigger the preconfigured SSRF sink. The same project has comprehensive SSRF protection in its MCP integration, which is absent from the HTTP node. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.73. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67540 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-11-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, get_workflow_template / get_node_template fetches a template by ID with no visibility / author / shared_with predicate, so any authenticated user can read (and use) any other tenant's private (visibility=specific_users) template — including its full node/edge graph and the email addresses it was shared with. The list endpoint enforces visibility correctly; the single-item get/use paths do not. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67541 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-11-13 | 8.1 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, team-member management (add / remove / update) is gated only on team membership, not on the team creator/admin role — and TeamMember has no role column. Any non-creator member can seat an attacker account into the team; because credential team-shares are scoped only by TeamMember.user_id, the newly-added attacker can then decrypt every credential shared into that team (provider API keys, OAuth tokens. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67543 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, heym hardens one untrusted-code path but not its sibling. The Python tool executor (python_tool_executor.py) treats user code as untrusted and mandates a Docker sandbox (no network, read-only fs, non-root, no docker socket), failing closed. The skill executor (skill_python_executor.py) runs skill Python via a local backend subprocess with no Docker isolation — only a 512 MB RLIMIT and a 7-key env denylist — so a skill executes inside the backend execution context, with filesystem access, network egress, and non-denylisted environment variables that should not be exposed to untrusted/shared skills. In the shipped Docker config (backend runs as root + /var/run/docker.sock mounted), this escalates to host root. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67544 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.71, Heym's workflow engine accepts an arbitrary Python code string in the playwrightCode field of a Playwright node. This string is written to a temporary .py file and executed directly by the backend process via subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, script_path]) with no sandboxing, AST validation, or role gate. Any authenticated user — including a freshly registered account — can achieve full remote code execution (RCE) on the backend host, running as the service process user (observed as root in the default Docker deployment). This issue has been patched in version 0.0.71. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67546 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.75, the same POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools endpoint (any authenticated user, lowest role) also accepts the stdio transport, which spawns the attacker-supplied command with attacker-supplied args and an environment merged over os.environ. The process executes on the shared backend host before MCP protocol validation fails — so side effects fire regardless of whether the command speaks MCP. This is a distinct weakness class and exploit primitive from the SSRF (Advisory 2) on the same endpoint, and needs a different fix (role gating / opt-in trust boundary rather than egress controls). This issue has been patched in version 0.0.75. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110873 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-10-22 | 7.1 High |
| Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55376 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-10-16 | 8.8 High |
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to 0.0.40, an authenticated user who can create or edit a workflow with an Agent custom Python tool can bypass the blacklist-based sandbox in backend/app/services/python_tool_executor.py because allowed standard-library modules expose operating-system, process, and filesystem capabilities through public attributes that pass _safe_import() and _validate_code_safety(). The runner then executes the supplied tool with exec(), permitting commands and file operations as the backend application user; self-registration affects reachability, but portal triggering alone does not grant code control. This issue is fixed in 0.0.40. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109362 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-10-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Heym v0.0.5 before v0.0.113 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows former collaborators to keep executing JWT-auth workflows by reusing scoped workflow:execute tokens after share removal. Attackers can mint a token with a TTL up to 10 years, which the owner cannot list or revoke, and repeatedly run the workflow consuming shared credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105396 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-10-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Heym before v0.0.112 contains a token leakage vulnerability in build_public_base_url() that allows unauthenticated attackers to redirect HITL review links by spoofing Origin or X-Forwarded-Host headers. Attackers can trigger anonymous workflows with forged headers so reviewer notifications point to attacker domains, capturing capability tokens to submit decisions executed with owner credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100863 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-30 | 5 Medium |
| Heym versions 0.0.90 and earlier contain two server-side request forgery (SSRF) egress gaps, both remediated in app/services/ssrf_guard.py in 0.0.91. First, the LLM image-edit input loader (_load_image_bytes) fetched caller-controlled HTTP/HTTPS URLs with a bare httpx.get, applying only a scheme check and bypassing the egress-pinning HTTP client; because the workflow DSL supports "imageInput": "$userInput.body.imageUrl", a webhook or API caller can choose the fetch target when a workflow author uses that expression, allowing requests to loopback, RFC1918, and cloud metadata endpoints. Second, _is_public_address unwrapped only IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, so IPv6 transition forms — the NAT64 well-known prefix 64:ff9b::/96, deprecated IPv4-compatible ::x.x.x.x addresses, and 6to4 (2002::/16, classified as globally routable by Python 3.11.0 through 3.11.9) — could carry loopback, RFC1918, link-local, or cloud-metadata IPv4 destinations past both the initial URL validation and the dial-time IP pin. Version 0.0.91 routes the image loader through guard_http_url and the guarded client, evaluates NAT64 and IPv4-compatible addresses by their embedded IPv4 address, and refuses 64:ff9b:1::/48, 6to4, and Teredo (2001::/32) outright. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100862 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-30 | 4.9 Medium |
| heym, a workflow automation platform, stores and returns multiple capability secrets in plaintext in versions prior to 0.0.91. Affected secrets include webhook header-auth values (returned in cleartext by GET /api/workflows/{id} and persisted unsanitized into execution history), MCP API keys (stored as a plaintext column, returned in config/list responses, and accepted via the ?key= query string so they leak into logs, proxies and Referer headers), portal session tokens (stored and validated by plaintext equality with a 168-hour TTL), workflow execution JWTs (stored in full and re-listed by GET .../execution-tokens), Discord interaction tokens (the full interaction body is stored in execution history), and global variables. A user with read access to a workflow, share/team membership, or anyone able to read the database, a backup, or logs can recover these secrets and replay them to execute workflows or act as the secret owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100859 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Heym before 0.0.106 contains a credential exfiltration vulnerability in the POST /api/credentials/test endpoint that allows collaborators with shared credential access to exfiltrate the credential owner's secret. Attackers can override the destination URL in the config parameter to cause the server to send decrypted authentication secrets to attacker-controlled endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100858 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-30 | 6.8 Medium |
| heym before 0.0.109 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Slack, Discord, and Crawler workflow nodes. These nodes issue HTTP requests to URLs taken from user-created credentials (webhook_url / flaresolverr_url) using an unguarded HTTP client, bypassing the SSRF egress guard that already protects the HTTP, WebSocket, and MCP nodes; the credential API validates only that the URL is non-empty. Any registered user can create a credential pointing at an internal address and execute a workflow, causing the backend to reach loopback, private, link-local, or cloud-metadata endpoints and return the full response body in the node output (non-blind SSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2026-100865 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-28 | 8.8 High |
| Heym before 0.0.53 evaluates workflow condition expressions using Python's eval() with insufficient sandboxing in the workflow executor service. Authenticated users can edit workflow condition nodes or import malicious templates to execute arbitrary Python and OS commands as the backend process user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100864 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-28 | 8.8 High |
| heym before 0.0.91 contains a sandbox escape vulnerability in the expression engine's DotList map/filter and fallback resolver that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary Python code. Attackers can craft workflow expressions using dunder attribute access through item expressions or the fallback resolver to access os.system and execute commands as the backend process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100860 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-28 | 5.5 Medium |
| heym before 0.0.105 does not act on the result of the credential authorization lookup in the Redis workflow node (backend/app/services/node_execution/nodes/redis_node.py). When _get_accessible_credential returns None — because the credential ID does not exist or the caller is not authorized to use it — the node treats the lookup failure as an empty configuration and falls back to defaults, connecting to localhost:6379 with no password and executing the requested operation there. The same fallback occurs when an accessible credential has an empty config or no redis_host value. An authenticated workflow author who supplies a credential ID they do not own, or one that was deleted, therefore obtains a read/write connection to whatever Redis is listening on the backend's loopback interface instead of an error. Impact depends on the deployment: the stock docker-compose.yml ships no Redis, in which case the flaw surfaces as a misleading connection error rather than data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101049 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify Slack request signatures when trigger nodes lack credential IDs or have empty signing secrets. Remote unauthenticated attackers can send forged Slack events to known webhook URLs to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101050 | 1 Heymrun | 1 Heym | 2026-09-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify the X-Telegram-Bot-Api-Secret-Token header on Telegram webhook endpoints when credential_id is absent or secret_token is empty. Remote unauthenticated attackers can post forged Telegram updates to trigger workflows with the owner's configured credentials and execute actions on attacker-supplied input. | ||||